LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by harmless »

:haha:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Jorge »

ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
Don't be a jackass.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by ABNorman »

theplatypus wrote:
ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
Don't be a jackass.
I honestly thought it was some weird plastic robot thing.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by harmless »

Fuzzcharger wrote:
stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.
Fuzzcharger wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:As much as im loving infallible, its no where near as good as tremor Christ
This outlandish claim also caught my attention. Absurdity of the highest order!
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by ABNorman »

The one thing that pisses me off about Vitalogy: On an album with a song called "Whipping", why the hell is the whip sound on Satan's Bed? 1/5
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Norah »

Because it sounds better there.
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by malice »

McParadigm wrote:A legend is born.
Tolkien describes the reproduction of saruman's uruk-hai as "they worm themselves like maggots out of the ground"

somehow, this is better than the adjective "born"
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by spike »

harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
the vocals, for starters.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by stip »

Fuzzcharger wrote:
stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.
No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36489
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Jorge »

You can do it. I believe in you.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
MemoFromTurner
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by MemoFromTurner »

spike wrote:
harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
the vocals, for starters.
Followed closely by the guitar sound.

Also,

Foxymophandlemomma > Future Days
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

stip wrote:
Fuzzcharger wrote:
stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.
No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.
Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album. :luv:
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by fishbob »

I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
User avatar
Fuzzcharger
Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Fuzzcharger »

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
stip wrote:
Fuzzcharger wrote:
stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.
No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.
Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album. :luv:
Stip only listens to Ten, Backspacer and Sirens. I find it hard to believe that he listens to No Code for any other purpose than creating content for his album reviews.

I will however admit that I read the original statement as being from this time period on, not a life time achievement thing :-)
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
twoheadedboy
A Return To Form
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 9:06 pm
Location: Kenosha, WI

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by twoheadedboy »

1. Last Exit
2. Spin The Black Circle
3. Not For You
4. Tremor Christ
5. Nothingman
6. Whipping

8. Corduroy
9. Bugs
10. Satan's Bed
11. Better Man

13. Immortality

I'm posting this tracklist to actually focus on the idea that LB could be better than Vitalogy. I challenge you to find any 3 LB songs better than any 3 of those listed Vitalogy songs. Take Bugs out and you have a better 10 songs than "Ten". In fact, you can't pick 3 songs off the last 2 albums better than the worst 3 songs out of that group. This thread hurts my brain.

I'm still missing the Quadrophenia-esque album they had in them sometime between 2000 - 2005. When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by Lament »

fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by fishbob »

Lament wrote:
fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.
I dunno, I find it conceptually interesting but not very exciting otherwise
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by McParadigm »

twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.

Plenty of artists build records around ideas that didnt make the previous records. These guys hold over ideas all the time. A 2007 follow-up to s/t with decent production and the broader palatte suggested by the leaked tracks/OTE could have been really, really cool.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by fishbob »

McParadigm wrote:
twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.

Plenty of artists build records around ideas that didnt make the previous records. These guys hold over ideas all the time. A 2007 follow-up to s/t with decent production and the broader palatte suggested by the leaked tracks/OTE could have been really, really cool.
It's not like they owed it to anyone to make a record like Backspacer (whether you like it or not, it was a weirdly ridiculous move)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?

Post by McParadigm »

Oh, I don't know. I like the idea of a short, less moody Pearl Jam album in theory. I think it might have played out better if it wasnt the only new music we got 2006-2013.
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply