LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Don't be a jackass.ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
I honestly thought it was some weird plastic robot thing.theplatypus wrote:Don't be a jackass.ABNorman wrote:NSFW gif
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
Fuzzcharger wrote:This outlandish claim also caught my attention. Absurdity of the highest order!Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:As much as im loving infallible, its no where near as good as tremor Christ
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
The one thing that pisses me off about Vitalogy: On an album with a song called "Whipping", why the hell is the whip sound on Satan's Bed? 1/5
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Because it sounds better there.
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Tolkien describes the reproduction of saruman's uruk-hai as "they worm themselves like maggots out of the ground"McParadigm wrote:A legend is born.
somehow, this is better than the adjective "born"
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35446
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
the vocals, for starters.harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
You can do it. I believe in you.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
MemoFromTurner
- Yeah Yeah Yeah
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Followed closely by the guitar sound.spike wrote:the vocals, for starters.harmless wrote:Everything on Vitalogy > Everything on Lightning Bolt
Also,
Foxymophandlemomma > Future Days
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album.stip wrote:No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- fishbob
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Down Under
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
- Fuzzcharger
- Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
- Location: Australia
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Stip only listens to Ten, Backspacer and Sirens. I find it hard to believe that he listens to No Code for any other purpose than creating content for his album reviews.Sgt. Crackpot wrote:Spot on. I'm not sure I could ever out play No Code, with any album. It still comes out several times a year and gets many spins. So the listens just keeping racking up. I want to be buried with that album.stip wrote:No Code has 16 years on lightning bolt. that's a lot of listens to make up.Fuzzcharger wrote:My goodness, that's a bizarre statement.stip wrote:I like LB more than no code but will probably never listen to it as much as no code
I will however admit that I read the original statement as being from this time period on, not a life time achievement thing
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
-
twoheadedboy
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 9:06 pm
- Location: Kenosha, WI
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
1. Last Exit
2. Spin The Black Circle
3. Not For You
4. Tremor Christ
5. Nothingman
6. Whipping
8. Corduroy
9. Bugs
10. Satan's Bed
11. Better Man
13. Immortality
I'm posting this tracklist to actually focus on the idea that LB could be better than Vitalogy. I challenge you to find any 3 LB songs better than any 3 of those listed Vitalogy songs. Take Bugs out and you have a better 10 songs than "Ten". In fact, you can't pick 3 songs off the last 2 albums better than the worst 3 songs out of that group. This thread hurts my brain.
I'm still missing the Quadrophenia-esque album they had in them sometime between 2000 - 2005. When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
2. Spin The Black Circle
3. Not For You
4. Tremor Christ
5. Nothingman
6. Whipping
8. Corduroy
9. Bugs
10. Satan's Bed
11. Better Man
13. Immortality
I'm posting this tracklist to actually focus on the idea that LB could be better than Vitalogy. I challenge you to find any 3 LB songs better than any 3 of those listed Vitalogy songs. Take Bugs out and you have a better 10 songs than "Ten". In fact, you can't pick 3 songs off the last 2 albums better than the worst 3 songs out of that group. This thread hurts my brain.
I'm still missing the Quadrophenia-esque album they had in them sometime between 2000 - 2005. When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- fishbob
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Down Under
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
I dunno, I find it conceptually interesting but not very exciting otherwiseLament wrote:In some other thread last week or so (I can't remember which one) I tried to make the case that Vitalogy is actually the most underrated Pearl Jam album by far. But I think we all got distracted by an awesome gif or something and the discussion never took off.fishbob wrote:I've always thought Vitalogy was the most overrated PJ album by far
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
Plenty of artists build records around ideas that didnt make the previous records. These guys hold over ideas all the time. A 2007 follow-up to s/t with decent production and the broader palatte suggested by the leaked tracks/OTE could have been really, really cool.
(patriotic choking noises)
- fishbob
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Down Under
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
It's not like they owed it to anyone to make a record like Backspacer (whether you like it or not, it was a weirdly ridiculous move)McParadigm wrote:You bring up a good point, in that the band was clearly writing/abandoning enough tracks for there to have been another 2000's album, if they didnt obsess over 1) not releasing a record until they were ready to commit to a trillion live dates, and 2) making each album a "statement" or "event" of some kind.twoheadedboy wrote:When the band leaves off Sad because it's "too pop" while also leaving off Fatal, Down, and Of The Earth during this time, you know their self-editing abilities and vision have dropped into Billy Corgan and Weezer-land (who frequently scrap their best material in favor of far substandard stuff). If I'm in Pearl Jam and those three tracks don't have a place on the applicable album, I change the album.
Plenty of artists build records around ideas that didnt make the previous records. These guys hold over ideas all the time. A 2007 follow-up to s/t with decent production and the broader palatte suggested by the leaked tracks/OTE could have been really, really cool.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: LB being a better album than Vitalogy is reasonable?
Oh, I don't know. I like the idea of a short, less moody Pearl Jam album in theory. I think it might have played out better if it wasnt the only new music we got 2006-2013.
(patriotic choking noises)