Not sure. I'm in St. Louis area and on the news this morning they reported Kansas (as in the state) is offering to pay 70% of cost for royals and chiefs stadiums.Bammer wrote:I gotta visit Kaufman before they let that happen.blueviper wrote:Soon to be Kansas City, Kansas Royals.spike wrote:
How many years from now, realistically?
MLB
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: MLB
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: MLB
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOblueviper wrote:Not sure. I'm in St. Louis area and on the news this morning they reported Kansas (as in the state) is offering to pay 70% of cost for royals and chiefs stadiums.Bammer wrote:I gotta visit Kaufman before they let that happen.blueviper wrote:Soon to be Kansas City, Kansas Royals.spike wrote:
How many years from now, realistically?
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: MLB
I wonder if most of that will come from johnson county.Monkey_Driven wrote:BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOblueviper wrote:Not sure. I'm in St. Louis area and on the news this morning they reported Kansas (as in the state) is offering to pay 70% of cost for royals and chiefs stadiums.Bammer wrote:I gotta visit Kaufman before they let that happen.blueviper wrote:Soon to be Kansas City, Kansas Royals.spike wrote:
How many years from now, realistically?
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48500
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: MLB
Field of Dreams game toning in Birmingham roll tide
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: MLB
The Kansas Speedway area is not convenient to get to for 70 percent of the metro area. Arrowhead and Kauffman's relatively central location makes much more sense.dad wrote:I wonder if most of that will come from johnson county.Monkey_Driven wrote:BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOblueviper wrote:Not sure. I'm in St. Louis area and on the news this morning they reported Kansas (as in the state) is offering to pay 70% of cost for royals and chiefs stadiums.Bammer wrote:I gotta visit Kaufman before they let that happen.blueviper wrote:Soon to be Kansas City, Kansas Royals.spike wrote:
How many years from now, realistically?
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48500
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: MLB
Passlvc wrote:Go Brewers.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- lvc
- Huge WNBA Fan
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
- Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger
Re: MLB
In any event, I can't tell if anyone's discussed the idea of ball/strike appeals so I'll raise the issue.
I'd be kind of for it but only on a strike 3 call. You get three strikes. If you don't agree with the zone on the first couple strikes, then be a big boy and protect a bigger zone. But no more getting punched out on a mistake.
I went to a AAA game and they were appealing every other call. It got boring and would definitely contradict with the "faster game" ethos to open it up in the MLB the same way.
I'd be kind of for it but only on a strike 3 call. You get three strikes. If you don't agree with the zone on the first couple strikes, then be a big boy and protect a bigger zone. But no more getting punched out on a mistake.
I went to a AAA game and they were appealing every other call. It got boring and would definitely contradict with the "faster game" ethos to open it up in the MLB the same way.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21687
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: MLB
I can see them limiting the amount you can do per game, or maybe counting them the same way you do other manager/team-initiated replays—I.e., you get it right, you keep your challenge, and if you get it wrong you lose it. But I’d like to be able to do it on any count, because a horrible called strike on a 3-1 count would turn into a walk without the pitcher getting another chance for strike 3.lvc wrote:In any event, I can't tell if anyone's discussed the idea of ball/strike appeals so I'll raise the issue.
I'd be kind of for it but only on a strike 3 call. You get three strikes. If you don't agree with the zone on the first couple strikes, then be a big boy and protect a bigger zone. But no more getting punched out on a mistake.
I went to a AAA game and they were appealing every other call. It got boring and would definitely contradict with the "faster game" ethos to open it up in the MLB the same way.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48500
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: MLB
The Giants f'n suck
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48500
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
- lvc
- Huge WNBA Fan
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
- Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger
Re: MLB
Then it's decided. Appeals by the batter only on strike 3, appeals by the pitcher only on ball 4. Thanks for helping me run the MLB. I'm sure our quorum will hold up.Simple Torture wrote:I can see them limiting the amount you can do per game, or maybe counting them the same way you do other manager/team-initiated replays—I.e., you get it right, you keep your challenge, and if you get it wrong you lose it. But I’d like to be able to do it on any count, because a horrible called strike on a 3-1 count would turn into a walk without the pitcher getting another chance for strike 3.lvc wrote:In any event, I can't tell if anyone's discussed the idea of ball/strike appeals so I'll raise the issue.
I'd be kind of for it but only on a strike 3 call. You get three strikes. If you don't agree with the zone on the first couple strikes, then be a big boy and protect a bigger zone. But no more getting punched out on a mistake.
I went to a AAA game and they were appealing every other call. It got boring and would definitely contradict with the "faster game" ethos to open it up in the MLB the same way.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: MLB
I would rather have an electronic 100% accurate system, which feeds to the home plate ump earpiece directly & instantaneously, who barks out the strike calls just like they do now.
Then they make all their other calls (safe, out, fair, foul, balk) as humans.
Don’t slow the game down on ball/strike appeals. Being right and keeping the challenge … fuck man they could do that on every at bat. Umps miss calls pretty frequently if they’re having a bad day.
Then they make all their other calls (safe, out, fair, foul, balk) as humans.
Don’t slow the game down on ball/strike appeals. Being right and keeping the challenge … fuck man they could do that on every at bat. Umps miss calls pretty frequently if they’re having a bad day.
(she/him/theirs)
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21687
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: MLB
I’ve watched a few AAA games this year and it barely slows the game down. There’s a guy on the Woo Sox who is known for his eye, he’s challenging pitches at like a 99% clip or something crazy like that.Bammer wrote:I would rather have an electronic 100% accurate system, which feeds to the home plate ump earpiece directly & instantaneously, who barks out the strike calls just like they do now.
Then they make all their other calls (safe, out, fair, foul, balk) as humans.
Don’t slow the game down on ball/strike appeals. Being right and keeping the challenge … fuck man they could do that on every at bat. Umps miss calls pretty frequently if they’re having a bad day.
McParadigm wrote:lol

