The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Jorge wrote:
4/5 wrote:Kinda surprised how excited RM is for Kamala Harris at the moment.
Dems on the whole seem positively elated. I think people went into a deep depression after that first debate and they kind of forgot what it felt like to think they had a chance.
that isnt the story though. Its the panic and vitriol from Trump down throughout the whole MAGA base and GOP stalwarts, theyre in meltdown over it.

thats the story.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45832
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

It's certainly a story.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47966
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

The first four pages of this thread are some terrible rm’ing
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by zeb »

How would you improve them, Lenny?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by B »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:The first four pages of this thread are some terrible rm’ing
You didn't enjoy the debate about whether or not I'm a shitty cousin?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Bammer »

B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Higgs
Petulant Bitch
Posts: 7037
Joined: Thu February 02, 2017 10:39 am
Location: Most likely at the office...

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Higgs »

Bammer wrote:
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
Free boops today.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by spike »

Higgs wrote:
Bammer wrote:
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Anders »

Hopefully she will win the election in November (the 2024 United States presidential election).
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 6:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Jorge »

Love you Anders
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Bammer »

spike wrote:
Higgs wrote:
Bammer wrote:
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35446
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by spike »

Bammer wrote:
spike wrote:
Higgs wrote:
Bammer wrote:
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
i think we're close to a breakthrough here
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Bammer »

spike wrote:
Bammer wrote:
spike wrote:
Higgs wrote:
Bammer wrote:
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
i think we're close to a breakthrough here
Go on
(she/him/theirs)
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by simple schoolboy »

New Birtherism dropped: Harris is ineligible because her parents weren't naturalized at the time of her birth (or something along those lines). Would "Native Born" mean something that would disqualify most of the founders?
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by Anders »

Jorge wrote:Love you Anders
Love you too.
tragabigzanda wrote:Thanks for clarifying and welcome back
Always someone ready with a joke, thought I would get ahead of them.

Thank you, although I never left.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by B »

Alright, calm down, Newsmax, she already has my vote.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by simple schoolboy »

User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by 4/5 »

simple schoolboy wrote:New Birtherism dropped: Harris is ineligible because her parents weren't naturalized at the time of her birth (or something along those lines). Would "Native Born" mean something that would disqualify most of the founders?
No.
Article 2 wrote:No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
Of course this version of birtherism is particularly absurd since she was born in the U.S., thus a natural born citizen and eligible to be president.
14th Amendment wrote:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread

Post by B »

Well ...

That IS a reconstruction amendment that the Supreme Court can't WAIT to strip away.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply