How would you have done that before the ruling?McParadigm wrote:Let’s try a different one.Bi_3 wrote:If Biden were to walk out of the white house and shoot dead a reporter asking him an embarrassing question because if he is humiliated he is less likely to command respect in Congress and thus less effective as an executive and commander in chief, do you honestly believe that this ruling somehow absolves him of the crime?
Suppose that it is early January, 2020 again. The President of the United States says “All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they're doing,” and then says that he has received briefings as President that lead him to believe the election results are not valid.
Suppose that he had a “yes man“ Attorney General who issued a statement saying “the office of the Attorney General agrees with the President’s summation of the situation, and hopes that the American people will remain calm and continue to support the Office of the President in the swift resolution of this matter in the name of democracy.”
Suppose the President had staffed most department leadership with simpering “yes men” as well, and they were quick to express their support even as he began calling for the arrest of his opponent.
How on earth would you ever prove for a fact that the president was misrepresenting the situation in order to stay in power, in this case, and not executing what they thought was an essential protective measure against election interference.
The Supreme Court
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
B wrote:
"Hello, Seal Team Six?"
Hmmm……
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35444
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Supreme Court
blow it up joe
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Got a little backlogged there, Bi_3. The joke was pretty irrelevant by July 16th.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Newsome orders California officials to clear homeless encampments.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I'm sure the ACLU is going to be filing and getting injunctions all over the place.4/5 wrote:Newsome orders California officials to clear homeless encampments.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
how long until they allow religious stuff in public schools? end of next year?
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7303
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
cant wait until some satanist kids demand their worship time and 10 commandments postedwarehouse wrote:how long until they allow religious stuff in public schools? end of next year?
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Could have put this in the transgender rights thread but any chance to bump this thread. The Court is going to hear a case on Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors today. Should start at 10 am if anybody's interested.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40168
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
Did you read that correctly?B wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Roberts, Alito, and Thomas aren't looking like they will overturn this ban.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
better?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40168
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
I dunno. Maybe? Maybe I’m not reading it right.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40168
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
I considered that. But with B, it’s always a question.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
I had to go deep cut with the arrow for sarcasm.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Props to Jackson for pointing out that Republicans are happy for cis gendered kids to get treatment that affirms their gender.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
Yeah, that didnt happen.B wrote:Props to Jackson for pointing out that Republicans are happy for cis gendered kids to get treatment that affirms their gender.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
