Save it for Later - EV
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Save it for Later - EV
I listen to this more often than any one song from Dark Matter.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
it’s great
record a covers album already, you coward!
record a covers album already, you coward!
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
yeah, its a great cover. I really like the production.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
-
sweeper
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
It's a Watt production, for the record. =)
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
The man knows how to get the best out of Ed
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Matters
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Stone sounds uncertain:Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:
“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Hearing this once was definitely enough.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Clearly not
-
sweeper
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Stone has actually been the most effusive in praising Watt in interviews. He has straight-up said he wants to do another record with him and called him "the perfect producer for us". I don't think he can be much more clear about how he feels about him.Birds in Hell wrote:Stone sounds uncertain:Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:
“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
I think that quote above is being misrepresented. It's completely possible Stone is proud of the Dark Matter output while also not believing it's the greatest thing they've ever done. That's downright logical, actually.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Those effusive quotes were from earlier in the year, around the time of the album's release.sweeper wrote:Stone has actually been the most effusive in praising Watt in interviews. He has straight-up said he wants to do another record with him and called him "the perfect producer for us". I don't think he can be much more clear about how he feels about him.Birds in Hell wrote:Stone sounds uncertain:Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:
“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
I think that quote above is being misrepresented. It's completely possible Stone is proud of Dark Matter output while also not believing it's the greatest thing they've ever done. That's downright logical, actually.
It's entirely possible Stone's views have changed since then.
-
sweeper
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
That's a stretch considering he didn't say anything that contradicts his previous statements.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
You have to admit, Stone's tone is quite different in that recent interview in suggesting he wants to move away from the approach they took on Dark Matter.
In any event, what does it matter? They probably won't make another record for a few years and who knows what will happen by then.
In any event, what does it matter? They probably won't make another record for a few years and who knows what will happen by then.
-
sweeper
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
It's a bit different but I also think that's Stone's personality where he's blunt at times vs. just giving the canned response: "Oh, this is the greatest moment of our careers." He'll just call it for what it is without the hyperbole.
I remember when Backspacer came out he did a radio interview in my local market. He was real direct (but respectful) with his responses. That took the DJ by surprise and she was basically insinuating that he was a jerk afterwards when he was gone. In reality, he was just not sugarcoating things and I got some of those vibes in that response here.
I remember when Backspacer came out he did a radio interview in my local market. He was real direct (but respectful) with his responses. That took the DJ by surprise and she was basically insinuating that he was a jerk afterwards when he was gone. In reality, he was just not sugarcoating things and I got some of those vibes in that response here.
- Leatherhead
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Spot on. I had tix to see EV in 2014 and had to bail. No regrets. I only just watched his Water on the Road dvd. Awful.Leatherhead wrote:Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Been listening to this more than I expected to. Love the vibes. Love the sax.
(patriotic choking noises)
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
I saw him once in NYC. I forget the year (poster is in my office, though). It was great. Wasn’t a big fan of uke songs thoughLetMeSleep wrote:Spot on. I had tix to see EV in 2014 and had to bail. No regrets. I only just watched his Water on the Road dvd. Awful.Leatherhead wrote:Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Matters
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm
Re: Save it for Later - EV
I’m really enjoying this. It gets into my soul right from the start. I kinda wish it would lose its shit more towards the end though.
I was reading about the original on Wiki and saw this cool story about the guitar tuning:
"Save It for Later" features a unique DADAAD tuning that Wakeling stumbled upon; he explained, "I had tried to tune my guitar to DADGAD to play along with Jon Martyn tunes in late 70's before the English Beat started. I accidentally came up with DADAAD, so I made up my own chord shapes and enjoyed the hypnotic drone of the tuning on my national steel for hour after hour." Due to the song's atypical tuning, Who guitarist Pete Townshend called Wakeling to ask how to play the song:
"I got a phone call at 11 in the morning, and somebody gave me the phone and said, “It’s Pete Townshend for you.” And I said, “Of course it is, he phones about this time every Saturday doesn’t he?” [Laughs.] I thought it was somebody making a joke. I picked up very sarcastically, 'Oh, hello Pete.' And he said, 'Oh, hello Dave, this is Peter Townshend here and I’m sitting with David Gilmour [of Pink Floyd], and we're trying to work out your song 'Save It for Later,' but we can’t work out the tuning.' They presumed it was DADGAD as well, and couldn’t make it work, and so I had to explain that I’d made a mistake and it was not DADGAD, it was DADAAD. And he laughed and said, 'Oh, thank heavens for that! We've been breaking our fingers trying to get our hands around these chords.'"
— Dave Wakeling
I was reading about the original on Wiki and saw this cool story about the guitar tuning:
"Save It for Later" features a unique DADAAD tuning that Wakeling stumbled upon; he explained, "I had tried to tune my guitar to DADGAD to play along with Jon Martyn tunes in late 70's before the English Beat started. I accidentally came up with DADAAD, so I made up my own chord shapes and enjoyed the hypnotic drone of the tuning on my national steel for hour after hour." Due to the song's atypical tuning, Who guitarist Pete Townshend called Wakeling to ask how to play the song:
"I got a phone call at 11 in the morning, and somebody gave me the phone and said, “It’s Pete Townshend for you.” And I said, “Of course it is, he phones about this time every Saturday doesn’t he?” [Laughs.] I thought it was somebody making a joke. I picked up very sarcastically, 'Oh, hello Pete.' And he said, 'Oh, hello Dave, this is Peter Townshend here and I’m sitting with David Gilmour [of Pink Floyd], and we're trying to work out your song 'Save It for Later,' but we can’t work out the tuning.' They presumed it was DADGAD as well, and couldn’t make it work, and so I had to explain that I’d made a mistake and it was not DADGAD, it was DADAAD. And he laughed and said, 'Oh, thank heavens for that! We've been breaking our fingers trying to get our hands around these chords.'"
— Dave Wakeling
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: Save it for Later - EV
Nice story
Went searching for the Townshend version and found this, selected for release on YouTube only days ago to promote a live box set (coincidence? I think not!)
Went searching for the Townshend version and found this, selected for release on YouTube only days ago to promote a live box set (coincidence? I think not!)