Save it for Later - EV

General Pearl Jam discussion.

Save It For Later

5 Stars
5
15%
4 Stars
8
24%
3 Stars
13
39%
2 Stars
6
18%
1 Star
1
3%
 
Total votes: 33

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by epilogue »

I listen to this more often than any one song from Dark Matter.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by stip »

it’s great


record a covers album already, you coward!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by VinylGuy »

yeah, its a great cover. I really like the production.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
sweeper
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by sweeper »

It's a Watt production, for the record. =)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by stip »

The man knows how to get the best out of Ed
User avatar
Matters
Future Drummer
Posts: 2716
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Matters »

Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Birds in Hell »

Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
Stone sounds uncertain:
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:

“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by LetMeSleep »

Hearing this once was definitely enough.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by epilogue »

Clearly not
sweeper
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by sweeper »

Birds in Hell wrote:
Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
Stone sounds uncertain:
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:

“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
Stone has actually been the most effusive in praising Watt in interviews. He has straight-up said he wants to do another record with him and called him "the perfect producer for us". I don't think he can be much more clear about how he feels about him.

I think that quote above is being misrepresented. It's completely possible Stone is proud of the Dark Matter output while also not believing it's the greatest thing they've ever done. That's downright logical, actually.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Birds in Hell »

sweeper wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
Matters wrote:Assuming they make another album, it’s gotta be Watt again right?
Stone sounds uncertain:
In a new interview with NME, when posed the question as to whether he sees “Dark Matter” as a career high, Gossard replied:

“I wouldn’t say that. I think it will end up being an impactful record – looking back at some point this record will be significant. Working with [producer] Andrew Watt was effective for us. In a sense, he was going back in time and saying, ‘You did this so well, just do this’. It makes me think ‘OK, we did that, now what’s the opposite of that? Let’s lean in the other direction’.”
Stone has actually been the most effusive in praising Watt in interviews. He has straight-up said he wants to do another record with him and called him "the perfect producer for us". I don't think he can be much more clear about how he feels about him.

I think that quote above is being misrepresented. It's completely possible Stone is proud of Dark Matter output while also not believing it's the greatest thing they've ever done. That's downright logical, actually.
Those effusive quotes were from earlier in the year, around the time of the album's release.

It's entirely possible Stone's views have changed since then.
sweeper
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by sweeper »

That's a stretch considering he didn't say anything that contradicts his previous statements.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Birds in Hell »

You have to admit, Stone's tone is quite different in that recent interview in suggesting he wants to move away from the approach they took on Dark Matter.

In any event, what does it matter? They probably won't make another record for a few years and who knows what will happen by then.
sweeper
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 327
Joined: Sun July 07, 2013 3:44 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by sweeper »

It's a bit different but I also think that's Stone's personality where he's blunt at times vs. just giving the canned response: "Oh, this is the greatest moment of our careers." He'll just call it for what it is without the hyperbole.

I remember when Backspacer came out he did a radio interview in my local market. He was real direct (but respectful) with his responses. That took the DJ by surprise and she was basically insinuating that he was a jerk afterwards when he was gone. In reality, he was just not sugarcoating things and I got some of those vibes in that response here.
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Leatherhead »

Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by LetMeSleep »

Leatherhead wrote:Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
Spot on. I had tix to see EV in 2014 and had to bail. No regrets. I only just watched his Water on the Road dvd. Awful.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by McParadigm »

Been listening to this more than I expected to. Love the vibes. Love the sax.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by stip »

LetMeSleep wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:Except Into The Wild, I can't seem to give a fuck about anything solo EV.
Spot on. I had tix to see EV in 2014 and had to bail. No regrets. I only just watched his Water on the Road dvd. Awful.
I saw him once in NYC. I forget the year (poster is in my office, though). It was great. Wasn’t a big fan of uke songs though
User avatar
Matters
Future Drummer
Posts: 2716
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by Matters »

I’m really enjoying this. It gets into my soul right from the start. I kinda wish it would lose its shit more towards the end though.

I was reading about the original on Wiki and saw this cool story about the guitar tuning:

"Save It for Later" features a unique DADAAD tuning that Wakeling stumbled upon; he explained, "I had tried to tune my guitar to DADGAD to play along with Jon Martyn tunes in late 70's before the English Beat started. I accidentally came up with DADAAD, so I made up my own chord shapes and enjoyed the hypnotic drone of the tuning on my national steel for hour after hour." Due to the song's atypical tuning, Who guitarist Pete Townshend called Wakeling to ask how to play the song:
"I got a phone call at 11 in the morning, and somebody gave me the phone and said, “It’s Pete Townshend for you.” And I said, “Of course it is, he phones about this time every Saturday doesn’t he?” [Laughs.] I thought it was somebody making a joke. I picked up very sarcastically, 'Oh, hello Pete.' And he said, 'Oh, hello Dave, this is Peter Townshend here and I’m sitting with David Gilmour [of Pink Floyd], and we're trying to work out your song 'Save It for Later,' but we can’t work out the tuning.' They presumed it was DADGAD as well, and couldn’t make it work, and so I had to explain that I’d made a mistake and it was not DADGAD, it was DADAAD. And he laughed and said, 'Oh, thank heavens for that! We've been breaking our fingers trying to get our hands around these chords.'"
— Dave Wakeling
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Save it for Later - EV

Post by ridleybradout »

Nice story :thumbsup:

Went searching for the Townshend version and found this, selected for release on YouTube only days ago to promote a live box set (coincidence? I think not!)

Post Reply