At any company I’ve worked for, minus the last, you’d be in trouble. What’s also best for the center is avoiding lawsuits. And low turnoverwease wrote:He knows. He also knew HR wouldn’t like it. But sometimes you just gotta do what’s best for the center and let HR sort it out later.The Argonaut wrote:My question is, how does wease still not know the proper procedure for firing someone? He's done it a thousand times by now
The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Last edited by lennytheweedwhacker on Tue August 13, 2024 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I was just saying that as a potential reason why employers may require advance notification. Either way, the way your company functions is not advisablewease wrote:Yep. That’s exactly what I did. As for last paycheck, this will be her only paycheck from us.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:The main across the board reason is to ensure there are no legal considerations or keep the company from being liable in possible discriminatory practices. There can be industry, company, state/federal law requirements (ie timing of last paycheck) involved as well.wease wrote:Why? Let’s see if your answer jibes with theirs.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:Rightfully so.wease wrote:Now HR is mad at me for firing her. Basically, they don’t like when we fire someone without going thru them.
So what do you do - tell the employee they’re gone then tell HR? Hopefully immediately…
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Carl Sandburg wrote:There is a wolf in me . . . fangs pointed for tearing gashes . . . a red tongue for raw meat . . . and the hot lapping of blood—I keep this wolf because the wilderness gave it to me and the wilderness will not let it go.
There is a fox in me . . . a silver-gray fox . . . I sniff and guess . . . I pick things out of the wind and air . . . I nose in the dark night and take sleepers and eat them and hide the feathers . . . I circle and loop and double-cross.
There is a hog in me . . . a snout and a belly . . . a machinery for eating and grunting . . . a machinery for sleeping satisfied in the sun—I got this too from the wilderness and the wilderness will not let it go.
There is a fish in me . . . I know I came from salt-blue water-gates . . . I scurried with shoals of herring . . . I blew waterspouts with porpoises . . . before land was . . . before the water went down . . . before Noah . . . before the first chapter of Genesis.
There is a baboon in me . . . clambering-clawed . . . dog-faced . . . yawping a galoot's hunger . . . hairy under the armpits . . . here are the hawk-eyed hankering men . . . here are the blonde and blue-eyed women . . . here they hide curled asleep waiting . . . ready to snarl and kill . . . ready to sing and give milk . . . waiting—I keep the baboon because the wilderness says so.
There is an eagle in me and a mockingbird . . . and the eagle flies among the Rocky Mountains of my dreams and fights among the Sierra crags of what I want . . . and the mockingbird warbles in the early forenoon before the dew is gone, warbles in the underbrush of my Chattanoogas of hope, gushes over the blue Ozark foothills of my wishes—And I got the eagle and the mockingbird from the wilderness.
O, I got a zoo, I got a menagerie, inside my ribs, under my bony head, under my red-valve heart—and I got something else: it is a man-child heart, a woman-child heart: it is a father and mother and lover: it came from God-Knows-Where: it is going to God-Knows-Where—For I am the keeper of the zoo: I say yes and no: I sing and kill and work: I am a pal of the world: I came from the wilderness.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Tue January 13, 2026 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I don’t know what any of those words meantragabigzanda wrote:Lenny I’m worried you’re using your best dating material here on RM
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
-
pepperwhiteMFC
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Thu April 21, 2016 12:19 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
This is going to be my response to those gibberish emails.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:I don’t know what any of those words meantragabigzanda wrote:Lenny I’m worried you’re using your best dating material here on RM
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
You can, but you’ll be fired on the spot.pepperwhiteMFC wrote:This is going to be my response to those gibberish emails.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:I don’t know what any of those words meantragabigzanda wrote:Lenny I’m worried you’re using your best dating material here on RM
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
a reminder, folks, that HR's priority is always to protect the company, not its employees, as HRs like to make their employees believe.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:At any company I’ve worked for, minus the last, you’d be in trouble. What’s also best for the center is avoiding lawsuits. And low turnoverwease wrote:He knows. He also knew HR wouldn’t like it. But sometimes you just gotta do what’s best for the center and let HR sort it out later.The Argonaut wrote:My question is, how does wease still not know the proper procedure for firing someone? He's done it a thousand times by now
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
A wrongful termination situation would be protecting the employee as well, holmesspike wrote:a reminder, folks, that HR's priority is always to protect the company, not its employees, as HRs like to make their employees believe.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:At any company I’ve worked for, minus the last, you’d be in trouble. What’s also best for the center is avoiding lawsuits. And low turnoverwease wrote:He knows. He also knew HR wouldn’t like it. But sometimes you just gotta do what’s best for the center and let HR sort it out later.The Argonaut wrote:My question is, how does wease still not know the proper procedure for firing someone? He's done it a thousand times by now
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40664
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Wrongful termination? The girl, quite literally, only showed up for the first of 6 shifts. Nothing wrongful about this termination.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:A wrongful termination situation would be protecting the employee as well, holmesspike wrote:a reminder, folks, that HR's priority is always to protect the company, not its employees, as HRs like to make their employees believe.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:At any company I’ve worked for, minus the last, you’d be in trouble. What’s also best for the center is avoiding lawsuits. And low turnoverwease wrote:He knows. He also knew HR wouldn’t like it. But sometimes you just gotta do what’s best for the center and let HR sort it out later.The Argonaut wrote:My question is, how does wease still not know the proper procedure for firing someone? He's done it a thousand times by now
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11939
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
But they want to be sure of it, wease. They're the experts. You are not god!
Please consider voting for me
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
wease I don’t know why you don’t understand I’m not speaking directly to this isolated, individual situation.
Also to note, something not many managers realize is an employee can sue them personally.
Also to note, something not many managers realize is an employee can sue them personally.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 48499
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Thank you for your love and support.The Argonaut wrote:But they want to be sure of it, wease. They're the experts. You are not god!
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11939
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Why did you get so rageful that you just needed to fire that person right then and there, proper procedure be damned? Now you're on the hook for whatever happens down the line. Control your emotions, wease
Please consider voting for me
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40664
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Gotchalennytheweedwhacker wrote:wease I don’t know why you don’t understand I’m not speaking directly to this isolated, individual situation.
Also to note, something not many managers realize is an employee can sue them personally.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40664
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
I’m in total control. No rage. Just fixed the issue before it got worse. I was totally within my jurisdiction to terminate her and I wasn’t waiting until a day HR was in office to do it. That would’ve been to the detriment to the center.The Argonaut wrote:Why did you get so rageful that you just needed to fire that person right then and there, proper procedure be damned? Now you're on the hook for whatever happens down the line. Control your emotions, wease
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11939
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Wease, you're gonna get sued. Hire a lawyer now
Please consider voting for me
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36752
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
Let me guess, she was also pregnant and black and developmentally disabled
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
E.H. Ruddock wrote:who the fuck misses six out of ten of their first days and expects to still have a job?
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- The Argonaut
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11939
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
- Location: in the air tonight
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
The issue is not whether or not she should be fired. The issue is why wease felt the need to fire this person against procedure, without going to HR first.
And I'll tell you why.
It's because wease wants to feel like a big man.
He doesn't want to get permission, he wants to feel like he is in charge. Wease doesn't want to ask permission to fire a woman. That's his right as a big man. Middle management with an ego, very dangerous. For his employees and for his employer.
Check yourself, wease!
And I'll tell you why.
It's because wease wants to feel like a big man.
He doesn't want to get permission, he wants to feel like he is in charge. Wease doesn't want to ask permission to fire a woman. That's his right as a big man. Middle management with an ego, very dangerous. For his employees and for his employer.
Check yourself, wease!
Please consider voting for me
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: The New & Unproved Work/Job/Career Thread
you are out of line, argo
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG