The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

This isn’t true is it?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

lol. I haven’t seen the third episode but that hasn’t happened yet
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by bada »

I'm not gonna hate watch this. I'm not going to watch videos complaining about it. Doesn't exist. Never happened. I might give the cartoon a try.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Bi_3 wrote:This isn’t true is it?

It’s true to the lore
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by bada »

I don't think Tolkien ever really came to a resolution as the the ultimate nature of the Orcs. As with most things he changed his mind a lot. It's always important to remember the Hobbit, the LOTR (and appendix) and the Adventures of Tom Bombadil are cannon. Everything else is Christopher Tolkien's very educated but still best understanding (guess) as to what his father intended. Even the Silmarillion.

I think that Tolkien quote Dime posted was more along the lines of the way Gollum both loved and loathed the one ring. It was the only thing keeping him going, it was his entire world without it he would be utterly without agency. There is no alternative for Gollum to the one ring. Similarly there is no alternative to Melkor or Sauron for the Orcs. They don't yearn for their wives and kids. I believe that was Tolkien's intention however he could never round it out to his satisfaction so I suppose one could get hacky with it.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Well the orcs were elves he captured and corrupted to begin with. Was the point.
Fairly sure he was clear about that at a few points. Seem to remember him answering what happens to them when they die? Don’t remember the answer though
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

dimejinky99 wrote:Well the orcs were elves he captured and corrupted to begin with. Was the point.
Fairly sure he was clear about that at a few points. Seem to remember him answering what happens to them when they die? Don’t remember the answer though
It’s presentism, nothing more
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by bada »

There are various versions of the origins of the Orcs. Originally they were created by Melkor from heat and slime much like we see Saurman doing in the Two Towers movies. Then Tolkien came up with the corruptive Elves but he didn't really like that idea. If they were elves they'd have souls and go to the Halls of Mandros to be judged. Tolkien was never satisfied with that but how could Melkor create life only Eru could do that? His intention was for them to be entirely evil but if they were tortured elves that doesn't feel very good. Tolkien got himself into a pickle.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

I wonder if orc families eat hobbit legs on Thanksgiving.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by McParadigm »

I don’t think Tolkien’s intentions should play any role in helping you decide if such a thing is narratively and conceptually appropriate here.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by McParadigm »

That’s my way of saying I think they do, Burt
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

It makes far more sense they are corrupted elves. How else would they be able to pro create if being creatures of melkor nothing he ‘made’ could pro create and only was a corruption of the creation of iluvatar?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Actually I take all that back.

This is abject nonsense. All of it.

Switch off and just enjoy it as a fun interpretation.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

To Bi's point about the orc family, what does it say about this show that that moment was more human and more relatable than anything else in any of the three episodes?
elf dwarf or man.

The whole politics of it is very on the nose too. I know they couldnt have planned this but the whole bit with the eagle and that being effectively stolen by the bad guys, bit close to the bone.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Ian McKellen Reveals He’s Been Approached To Reprise His Role As Gandalf In Andy Serkis’ New ‘The Lord Of The Rings’ Films

https://deadline.com/2024/09/ian-mckell ... 236075547/
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

"I'm not letting anyone else put on the pointy hat and beard if I can help it."’

- Sir Ian McKellen on anyone else playing Gandalf❤️

Via @BBCNews
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Bi_3 wrote:This isn’t true is it?

haha. when the official LOTR account slaps some Tolkien on the table and goes 'fuck you ignorant fools'
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

Is anyone even watching this slop? Sounds like the audience has dropped 50-70% from the first episode, and no one is talking about it. People can barely be bothered to hate on it. It's a billion dollar nothing.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

BurtReynolds wrote:Is anyone even watching this slop? Sounds like the audience has dropped 50-70% from the first episode, and no one is talking about it. People can barely be bothered to hate on it. It's a billion dollar nothing.
'people arent talking about it' you obviously arent online outside RM much, if ever.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: The all inclusive Lord of the Rings thread

Post by Bi_3 »

dimejinky99 wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:This isn’t true is it?

haha. when the official LOTR account slaps some Tolkien on the table and goes 'fuck you ignorant fools'


The fact that this was necessary for them to post a week after folks stop caring should tell you something
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post Reply