band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by BurtReynolds »

Hum
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
Jammer XCI
Future Drummer
Posts: 3251
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 12:11 am
Location: The 216
Contact:

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by Jammer XCI »

I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Morbid Angel
Hard disagree, but agree in certain circumstances? I love Formulas Fatal to the Flesh but even Tucker's best material wasn't as good as Altars through Domination. But then again, I'd much rather take anything Tucker including Heretic over that goddamn terrible Illud Divinidum whatever reunion album from 2011, that shit was inexcusably awful. In 2024 I'd probably rather see David Vincent and Pete Sandoval's Morbid Angel stand-in project live over Morbid Angel again though, Trey is beyond fried.
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.
Blind kinda fucking rules though. The albums they put out without Pepper in the 2010's were trash though.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Jammer XCI wrote:I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Morbid Angel
Hard disagree, but agree in certain circumstances? I love Formulas Fatal to the Flesh but even Tucker's best material wasn't as good as Altars through Domination. But then again, I'd much rather take anything Tucker including Heretic over that goddamn terrible Illud Divinidum whatever reunion album from 2011, that shit was inexcusably awful. In 2024 I'd probably rather see David Vincent and Pete Sandoval's Morbid Angel stand-in project live over Morbid Angel again though, Trey is beyond fried.
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:Corrosion of Conformity, from Karl Agell to Pepper Keenan.
Blind kinda fucking rules though. The albums they put out without Pepper in the 2010's were trash though.
The only MA albums I care about are Gateways to Annihilation and Kingdoms Disdained. I don’t like David Vincent’s voice at all, especially now that he’s ruining Blasphemer’s music in Vltimas.
User avatar
lvc
Huge WNBA Fan
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by lvc »

Van Halen. But which switch? It's a mystery.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by BurtReynolds »

Jammer XCI wrote:I didn't even know Hum had a singer besides Matt.
They would like to pretend their first album doesn't exist, but it's not bad. Just doesn't sound like Hum.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
oasisfan35
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4683
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by oasisfan35 »

lvc wrote:Van Halen. But which switch? It's a mystery.
Not to Sammy.

I honestly prefer my Van Halen with no vocals at all.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: band that was actually improved by replacing a singer?

Post by darth_vedder »

bada wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Genesis
I like a real specific era of Genesis. Like 80-83. Not that I dislike what came before and to a certain extent after but I think its their ideal iteration.
I think I'm with you. I know it's cooler to rattle off some Gabriel led Genesis tunes, but I like that spot when they were making hits but not pure 80's cheese yet. Maybe like late 70's / early 80's. I do like some of the Peter Gabriel materiel, but overall it's just not my thing.
Post Reply