Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

[spike]

so we’re slowly drifting towards normalizing this lunatic

the next phase has begun

[Strat]

Yup. Cause woke. Democrats. Yada yada.

[BurtReynolds]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

[Bammer]

"He's a liar and a conman, sure, but that's not uniquely Trump"

Yeah nice one, Tucker.

Sorry, I should have elaborated on that thought. I was implying that many politicians in America are probably liars and conmen (or conwomen).

The lot of them

[tommy]

"He's a liar and a conman, sure, but that's not uniquely Trump"

Yeah nice one, Tucker.

Sorry, I should have elaborated on that thought. I was implying that many politicians in America are probably liars and conmen (or conwomen).

The lot of them

Exclude Bernie and we agree.

[Strat]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

Tell me how Donald trump is serving their best interests other than making them feel good about hating liberals, which, is culture war woke shit just with a red slant.

It's all fucked. You just hate liberals more

[washing machine]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

While we're at it, stop looking to the government to police your morals. Vote with your dollars and tell the market how you feel.

[Bammer]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

While we're at it, stop looking to the government to police your morals. Vote with your dollars and tell the market how you feel.

I love the idea of voting with my dollars, yet here I am purchasing tickets to and sweatshirts at Pearl Jam concerts.

[epilogue]

"He's a liar and a conman, sure, but that's not uniquely Trump"

Yeah nice one, Tucker.

Sorry, I should have elaborated on that thought. I was implying that many politicians in America are probably liars and conmen (or conwomen).

The lot of them

One of the biggest myths/misinformation today.

[epilogue]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

While we're at it, stop looking to the government to police your morals. Vote with your dollars and tell the market how you feel.

I understand that this comment with be antithetical to the spirit of the conversation over the last few pages, but... that's a pretty privileged comment. It just doesn't work because there are too many people that can't do that or that it doesn't apply to.

[washing machine]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

While we're at it, stop looking to the government to police your morals. Vote with your dollars and tell the market how you feel.

I understand that this comment with be antithetical to the spirit of the conversation over the last few pages, but... that's a pretty privileged comment. It just doesn't work because there are too many people that can't do that or that it doesn't apply to.

Don't you think those who have the means to support progressive causes they believe in would have a more direct impact supporting in the market? If yes, don't you think the market would respond more efficiently than phony politicians that are using your causes (poorly, as it seems) for demographic share?

[tragabigzanda]

FUCK ICE

[BurtReynolds]

This is some good news. Sounds like he has no intention of dealing with neocons this time around.

[BurtReynolds]

I see some idiots crying about not having a "liberal Rogan". You had a liberal Rogan. It was Joe Rogan. But he wasn't pure enough. He says some dumb shit! He talks to everyone! He's too dangerous!

It's amazing to see how many people running the Republican party now are just Democrat exiles:
Rogan was a Bernie bro.
RFK was on the left.
Musk was a liberal.
Tulsi was a Democrat.
Even Trump was at least nominally a Democrat.

Castoffs from across the left. The old right in shambles!

Tucker Carlson is still hanging around... but he's gone full Alex Jones lately so I guess he'll stick around.

[tragabigzanda]

FUCK ICE

[epilogue]

We're not voting for the next Jesus. People should vote for their best interests. I don't care about Trump enough to want to punish him by vote. He's a billionaire with a supermodel wife and a gigantic son. Face it, he already won. Let go of the bitter socialist resentment that eats your soul away!

While we're at it, stop looking to the government to police your morals. Vote with your dollars and tell the market how you feel.

I understand that this comment with be antithetical to the spirit of the conversation over the last few pages, but... that's a pretty privileged comment. It just doesn't work because there are too many people that can't do that or that it doesn't apply to.

Don't you think those who have the means to support progressive causes they believe in would have a more direct impact supporting in the market? If yes, don't you think the market would respond more efficiently than phony politicians that are using your causes (poorly, as it seems) for demographic share?

I literally have no idea what you're asking. But I can tell by context clues that there's a bad-faith answer that you want me to veer toward... so, I'm just gonna go ahead and say no. Because that feels like the thing you want me to say.

[Strat]

I see some idiots crying about not having a "liberal Rogan". You had a liberal Rogan. It was Joe Rogan. But he wasn't pure enough. He says some dumb shit! He talks to everyone! He's too dangerous!

It's amazing to see how many people running the Republican party now are just Democrat exiles:
Rogan was a Bernie bro.
RFK was on the left.
Musk was a liberal.
Tulsi was a Democrat.
Even Trump was at least nominally a Democrat.

Castoffs from across the left. The old right in shambles!

Tucker Carlson is still hanging around... but he's gone full Alex Jones lately so I guess he'll stick around.

You need to get off TikTok. Just cause you saw 5 videos of this dumb discussion, doesnt mean its a thing. I saw them too.

[BurtReynolds]

I don't know what you're talking about.

[Strat]

*likes*

[BurtReynolds]

Oh you mean that MSNBC clip of the dude with the funny hair.