Damn you Harmless.harmless wrote:Lament wrote:I'm tweeting this. Fucking gold.harmless wrote:Pearl Jam, masturbation, whatever it is -- these things can only be as good as you'll let them.
Masturbation was my thing. I'll try to do better .
Damn you Harmless.harmless wrote:Lament wrote:I'm tweeting this. Fucking gold.harmless wrote:Pearl Jam, masturbation, whatever it is -- these things can only be as good as you'll let them.
It's still new to me but Gravedigger's Song, Bleeding Muddy Water and Phantasmagoria Blues are top tier.stip wrote:I wonder which one I think is objectively better. Blues Funeral is a more dramatic listen. Both have a few top tier songs and are generally strong listens from top to bottom. Probably more songs I don't really care about on Blues Funeral, but nothing on L-bolt is as good as gravedigger's song.
It's hard. Good pearl jam will just be so satisfying in a way that good other things, even great other things, aren't for me.
Mark Lanegan can't do anthems all that well (quiver syndrome is decent, but not great). But that slower moodier stuff is fantastic. Ed's take would be less dark, but they could do that stuff well.Thejambi wrote:It's still new to me but Gravedigger's Song, Bleeding Muddy Water and Phantasmagoria Blues are top tier.stip wrote:I wonder which one I think is objectively better. Blues Funeral is a more dramatic listen. Both have a few top tier songs and are generally strong listens from top to bottom. Probably more songs I don't really care about on Blues Funeral, but nothing on L-bolt is as good as gravedigger's song.
It's hard. Good pearl jam will just be so satisfying in a way that good other things, even great other things, aren't for me.
It's a ridiculous exercise but this album's sound, both in production and composition, is what I feel would be Pearl Jam's sweet spot.
Stop. STOP.stip wrote:I wonder which one I think is objectively better.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
All i could read there was: LIGHTNING BOLT.harmless wrote:Lightning Bolt is so frustrating because it's really good in so many spots, but even though it's good, it's still not trying. Imagine if PJ really *tried* to make a great record now; Lightning Bolt proves they still could, even if they haven't in Lightning Bolt.
They are very different. I guess thinking about the No Code era along with Jeff and Stone solo work, I could see PJ doing this music very successfully. I do enjoy Lightning Bolt but I may be getting a little fatigued on the urgency and anthem-ed nature of modern PJ. Which I admit is a little unfair considering that is Pearl Jam''s m.o.VinylGuy wrote:Oh shit, PJ and Lanegan are so different....even the Trees are very different from PJ.
Im glad i have both, but Blues Funeral might be a better album just because its trying more than LB.
And yes, Alain Johannes is a great producer/musician.
VinylGuy wrote:All i could read there was: LIGHTNING BOLT.harmless wrote:Lightning Bolt is so frustrating because it's really good in so many spots, but even though it's good, it's still not trying. Imagine if PJ really *tried* to make a great record now; Lightning Bolt proves they still could, even if they haven't in Lightning Bolt.
but yeah, i agree.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Agreed. I really would love them to eventually get past this reaching for an anthem, grab four bar stools and just hammer out a low-key record with lots of low register from Ed. Also, more twelve-string acoustic. God it's making my ears happy.Thejambi wrote:They are very different. I guess thinking about the No Code era along with Jeff and Stone solo work, I could see PJ doing this music very successfully. I do enjoy Lightning Bolt but I may be getting a little fatigued on the urgency and anthem-ed nature of modern PJ. Which I admit is a little unfair considering that is Pearl Jam''s m.o.VinylGuy wrote:Oh shit, PJ and Lanegan are so different....even the Trees are very different from PJ.
Im glad i have both, but Blues Funeral might be a better album just because its trying more than LB.
And yes, Alain Johannes is a great producer/musician.
Hearing an album like Blues Funeral just reminds me of the side of Pearl Jam that hasn't been followed as extensive.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
yes, it would be nice to see them experimenting again. Leave the anthem thing a little behind and sit down and make a weird album...they could even rock out more. Hell who knows!harmless wrote:Agreed. I really would love them to eventually get past this reaching for an anthem, grab four bar stools and just hammer out a low-key record with lots of low register from Ed. Also, more twelve-string acoustic. God it's making my ears happy.Thejambi wrote:They are very different. I guess thinking about the No Code era along with Jeff and Stone solo work, I could see PJ doing this music very successfully. I do enjoy Lightning Bolt but I may be getting a little fatigued on the urgency and anthem-ed nature of modern PJ. Which I admit is a little unfair considering that is Pearl Jam''s m.o.VinylGuy wrote:Oh shit, PJ and Lanegan are so different....even the Trees are very different from PJ.
Im glad i have both, but Blues Funeral might be a better album just because its trying more than LB.
And yes, Alain Johannes is a great producer/musician.
Hearing an album like Blues Funeral just reminds me of the side of Pearl Jam that hasn't been followed as extensive.