Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Thejambi »

McParadigm wrote:How about this: everyone needs to masturbate more
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by McParadigm »

Thejambi wrote:
McParadigm wrote:How about this: everyone needs to masturbate more
that reminds me

off to gd....
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Norah »

theplatypus wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Jesus jimmy fallon is enthusiastic about everything. I LOVE TRAINS.
I dig the enthusiasm but it gets to be a little grating. He's had Elvis Costello on a few times (which resulted in the new Roots/Costello album) and the interview segments are awful 'cause he's just stammering and tripping over himself talking about how much of a fan he is. Just relax, guy.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/4186
13inlet
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon September 09, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by 13inlet »

Release_Me wrote:[
In comparison to which other songs in the catalogue, though? I can sure think of a ton of songs (mostly ballads) which are easier than Sirens in their catalogue. My point was in response to posts which were saying 'Man he's really struggling with Sirens live. He shouldn't write songs which are outside his range. He can't sing high anymore'. So obviously, I have focused on dispelling the myth that this song is challenging from that perspective, i.e. singing the higher parts. The fact that structurally the song is not as simple as some others is something I have not argued for or against. Now that you have mentioned it, despite the structure, it is still not vocally as challenging overall as some of the other LB songs. Melodically, there is a lot going on but it's not a song that a professional singer like Ed will struggle to sing as long as he remembers the parts and isn't hindered in some way (which Ed obviously was).

He rarely gets live performances as good as studio these days regardless of the song's difficulty, but there are certainly songs he 'struggles' to sing live and that tax his voice and there are those that don't. This is one which doesn't tax him too much. He might flub it at certain parts because he's lazy or because he's too tired to execute properly, or because he's too busy bobbing his head, playing guitar or gesturing to the crowd, but then he'd do that to many other songs too. Sirens is not special in that regard. I can't imagine him trying to sing MYM, My Father's Son, Getaway, Lightning Bolt or Infallible in the shape he was in. If he tried Infallible, I would cover my ears or I might even 'cringe'. The Fallon performance was bad because he was struggling with his voice. Tone is not something you have control over, much. If you sound hoarse, you sound hoarse. The verses have him not doing much, just singing normally. He sounds off there because his voice is shot. That was my point all along. When you're hoarse, you might actually sound a bit better if you try to belt. That's why the chorus may sound a bit better, if more strained, than the intro verse.

Again, I'm not arguing Sirens is not a difficult song in an absolute sense. It's just not that difficult compared to some of the others on the album. And if we have to discuss Ed writing songs which are outside his 'current capabilities', Sirens would be a bit down the list for me.
Fair enough. I guess I agree with you in some areas, disagree in others. On net, it's all good. Hopefully, he'll come back out tonight in better shape. If they are going to play lightning bolt the end of that song could end up brutal if he's still struggling.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by BurtReynolds »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Jesus jimmy fallon is enthusiastic about everything. I LOVE TRAINS.
I dig the enthusiasm but it gets to be a little grating. He's had Elvis Costello on a few times (which resulted in the new Roots/Costello album) and the interview segments are awful 'cause he's just stammering and tripping over himself talking about how much of a fan he is. Just relax, guy.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/4186
Remember when he was so excited to introduce guns n Ross at the MTV music awards? That will always be my picture of him. He got me so excited for that trainwreck...
RM's resident disinformation expert.
iceagecoming
A Return To Form
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:13 am
Location: Saint Petersburg

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by iceagecoming »

I thought this was fine. It's a shame that it's the weakest rendition they've done of it since the tour started though.

Ed's vocal hiccups were forgiveable - they didn't ruin anything for me;Mike's harmonies were the worst part of this performance.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stip »

iceagecoming wrote:I thought this was fine. It's a shame that it's the weakest rendition they've done of it since the tour started though.

Ed's vocal hiccups were forgiveable - they didn't ruin anything for me;Mike's harmonies were the worst part of this performance.
yeah, i pretty much agree. It was not a stellar performance, but it wasn't a trainwreck.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by mastaflatch »

stip wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:I thought this was fine. It's a shame that it's the weakest rendition they've done of it since the tour started though.

Ed's vocal hiccups were forgiveable - they didn't ruin anything for me;Mike's harmonies were the worst part of this performance.
yeah, i pretty much agree. It was not a stellar performance, but it wasn't a trainwreck.
sorry if it's been been brought up before but why wasn't Matt doing the backing vocals instead? who does them on regular shows? i mean, Matt even sang them on the album.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

mastaflatch wrote:
stip wrote:
iceagecoming wrote:I thought this was fine. It's a shame that it's the weakest rendition they've done of it since the tour started though.

Ed's vocal hiccups were forgiveable - they didn't ruin anything for me;Mike's harmonies were the worst part of this performance.
yeah, i pretty much agree. It was not a stellar performance, but it wasn't a trainwreck.
sorry if it's been been brought up before but why wasn't Matt doing the backing vocals instead? who does them on regular shows? i mean, Matt even sang them on the album.
:thumbsup:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
paintedbynumbers
In The Troll Box
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed July 31, 2013 1:19 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by paintedbynumbers »

I just re-watched this, did anyone else notice Eddie not wearing his wedding ring? I haven't noticed this before. Also in Buffalo all the band members were signing the harmonies for Sirens. The guy sitting behind me said he hadn't seen that before. Of course it was only the second show of the tour and they didn't do it in Pittsburgh.
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by fishbob »

Just hear The Gaslight Anthem do State of Love and Trust

Couldn't make it to the end, they are shit
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45833
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by BurtReynolds »

Please tell me he's getting a divorce.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

BurtReynolds wrote:Please tell me he's getting a divorce.
The next album is sure to be a return to form if he is!
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

Could be ukulele songs redux:moar ukulele
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by VinylGuy »

harmless wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Please tell me he's getting a divorce.
The next album is sure to be a return to form if he is!
MOAR UKELELE SONGS!!
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by spike »

stupidmop wrote:
spike wrote:looks like ed will be in the interview chair for a bit tomorrow night
That's gonna be weird/awkward as hell. Has ed ever done a tv interview before?
in the early day, and yeah, he was weird and uncomfortable. i think he's grown up a lot though.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by doug rr »

spike wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
spike wrote:looks like ed will be in the interview chair for a bit tomorrow night
That's gonna be weird/awkward as hell. Has ed ever done a tv interview before?
in the early day, and yeah, he was weird and uncomfortable. i think he's grown up a lot though.
what would Ed be like if he was over 5 ft 6?
User avatar
Ledbetterman10
A Return To Form
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 10:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Ledbetterman10 »

Anyone have an mp3 of Corduory by Pecknold?
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35453
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by spike »

doug rr wrote:
spike wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
spike wrote:looks like ed will be in the interview chair for a bit tomorrow night
That's gonna be weird/awkward as hell. Has ed ever done a tv interview before?
in the early day, and yeah, he was weird and uncomfortable. i think he's grown up a lot though.
what would Ed be like if he was over 5 ft 6?
chris cornell
Tj
Future Drummer
Posts: 2132
Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Tj »

I am not sure if I watched what everybody else watched last night. I thought it was stellar. I was not alone my wife who is a Pearl Jam fan, but unwilling to come to terms with that fact said "that made me like them more". "Okay Ed is great" I couldn't believe my ears. She really does'nt like Sirens all that much either, but she was really impressed.
Post Reply