Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

Post by B » Thu January 09, 2025 12:54 pm

God damn it, John!

Farmer John · Post by **Farmer John** » Thu January 09, 2025 12:55 pm

You gotta be quicker with those gifs!

Post by B » Thu January 09, 2025 12:57 pm

Farmer John wrote:You gotta be quicker with those gifs!

I had to write a couple of drafts of a sarcastic personal attack and think better of it before I resorted to giphy.

E.H. Ruddock · Post by **E.H. Ruddock** » Thu January 09, 2025 1:02 pm

Bi_3 wrote:Just so I understand... do folks here think turning Greenland into a US territory is a bad idea?

If it is against the wishes of the people of Greenland, yes.

Post by B » Thu January 09, 2025 1:11 pm

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Just so I understand... do folks here think turning Greenland into a US territory is a bad idea?
If it is against the wishes of the people of Greenland, yes.

You still haven't learned the lessons of the election, Ruddo.

spike · Post by **spike** » Thu January 09, 2025 1:14 pm

it's not even about the idea, it's how he goes about it.

Bi_3 · Post by **Bi_3** » Thu January 09, 2025 1:37 pm

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Just so I understand... do folks here think turning Greenland into a US territory is a bad idea?
If it is against the wishes of the people of Greenland, yes.

100% agree

Peeps · Post by **Peeps** » Thu January 09, 2025 1:48 pm

Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.

nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid

Bi_3 · Post by **Bi_3** » Thu January 09, 2025 2:03 pm

Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid

"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.

Peeps · Post by **Peeps** » Thu January 09, 2025 3:12 pm

Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid
"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.

i dont believe for even a second he cares about that. he wants the resources so he and his family can make money off it

Rob · Post by **Rob** » Thu January 09, 2025 3:18 pm

Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid
"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.

Do you support the US just taking it, regardless of their wishes? It seems they do not want this, so it’s a moot point unless we’re just going to annex it anyway. And then that begs the question - does US imperialism against western allies threaten our national security? Maybe I’m just aggressively misunderstanding the whole thing?

Post by **4/5** » Thu January 09, 2025 3:28 pm

My question is, does all of this make World War III more or less likely?

Bi_3 · Post by **Bi_3** » Thu January 09, 2025 3:35 pm

Rob wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid
"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.
Do you support the US just taking it, regardless of their wishes? It seems they do not want this, so it’s a moot point unless we’re just going to annex it anyway. And then that begs the question - does US imperialism against western allies threaten our national security? Maybe I’m just aggressively misunderstanding the whole thing?

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 7#p2146377

tommy · Post by **tommy** » Thu January 09, 2025 3:36 pm

Rob wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid
"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.
Do you support the US just taking it, regardless of their wishes? It seems they do not want this, so it’s a moot point unless we’re just going to annex it anyway. And then that begs the question - does US imperialism against western allies threaten our national security? Maybe I’m just aggressively misunderstanding the whole thing?

Does Rob fall into the "Misunderstanding Israel/Palestine" bucket or the "Misunderstanding Greenland" bucket? Can you be in multiple buckets?

Bi_3 · Post by **Bi_3** » Thu January 09, 2025 4:10 pm

tommy wrote:
Rob wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
Peeps wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:Cool, I already had you two in the "aggressively misunderstands the issue" bucket.
nothing misunderstanding about it

the orange douche wants to take ownership of greenland for its resources (oil, natural gas ad minerals {lithium anybody?])

he has said it is to keep world peace and protect the world but anyone who believes that has to be incredibly stupid
"aggressively misunderstands the issue"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-nat ... sea-route/

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/chi ... the-north/

And supplies of critical minerals are a national security threat my evenbro.
Do you support the US just taking it, regardless of their wishes? It seems they do not want this, so it’s a moot point unless we’re just going to annex it anyway. And then that begs the question - does US imperialism against western allies threaten our national security? Maybe I’m just aggressively misunderstanding the whole thing?
Does Rob fall into the "Misunderstanding Israel/Palestine" bucket or the "Misunderstanding Greenland" bucket? Can you be in multiple buckets?

I don't think Rob misunderstands Israel/Palestine, I think he and I have different first principles on that topic and to my recollection he has always engaged in open and respectful manner. Solid N&D'er right there.

tragabigzanda · Post by **tragabigzanda** » Thu January 09, 2025 6:25 pm

FUCK ICE

tommy · Post by **tommy** » Thu January 09, 2025 7:36 pm

But Greenland and Canada don't want to be part of the USA, so it's a moot point. Let's all move on.

tragabigzanda · Post by **tragabigzanda** » Thu January 09, 2025 7:47 pm

FUCK ICE

Post by B » Thu January 09, 2025 7:49 pm

It would do a lot for economic expansion if we annexed Europe.

tragabigzanda · Post by **tragabigzanda** » Thu January 09, 2025 7:50 pm

FUCK ICE

Red Mosquito