Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stip »

For the most part people agreed he was struggling. The debate was whether it was fatigue from the shows or a lack of inherent capacity.

Probably a bit of both
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45831
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by BurtReynolds »

shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
I mean, that's always why people have vocal troubles, right?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

Habitman wrote:
Release_Me wrote:
harmless wrote:Remembering lyrics is an inherent part of sounding good vocally, in my book. When the band is singing in English, and when the lyrics are meant to be a crucial part of the song...
Flubbing lyrics doesn't really affect how the vocals sound, but they do have a lot to do with the overall appreciation of the song. Since I know the song, I don't care if he repeats the same verses second time around as he did in Wrigley. If you hadn't heard the studio, as we hadn't then, it really didn't affect the appreciation of the song even.
One of his most iconic (maybe the most) performances was flubbed.
Black/unplugged.
People always mention this and I never hear it, what does he mess up?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
Habitman wrote:
Release_Me wrote:
harmless wrote:Remembering lyrics is an inherent part of sounding good vocally, in my book. When the band is singing in English, and when the lyrics are meant to be a crucial part of the song...
Flubbing lyrics doesn't really affect how the vocals sound, but they do have a lot to do with the overall appreciation of the song. Since I know the song, I don't care if he repeats the same verses second time around as he did in Wrigley. If you hadn't heard the studio, as we hadn't then, it really didn't affect the appreciation of the song even.
One of his most iconic (maybe the most) performances was flubbed.
Black/unplugged.
People always mention this and I never hear it, what does he mess up?
Neither do I.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by southp »

I love that lightning bolt performance last night. It gave me a greater appreciation for one of my lesser favourites on the album. Fantastic!

Meanwhile, Sirens is on my top tracks on LB and I felt let down by the performance. Although it did pick up towards the end (after the guitar switch).
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by digster »

I think it's way easier for up-tempo songs to translate into these types of television performances, though, both in terms of playing and watching them.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

digster wrote:I think it's way easier for up-tempo songs to translate into these types of television performances, though, both in terms of playing and watching them.
Yeah. When Fallon says "SIREEENS!!!!!" in his excruciatingly excited voice, and then they play a ballad, it's kind of a buzzkill.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by evenslow »

digster wrote:I think it's way easier for up-tempo songs to translate into these types of television performances, though, both in terms of playing and watching them.
yeah the slow stuff doesn't utilize the band enough.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by evenslow »

stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
say something nice today. i dare you.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
The song wasn't sped up at all for this performance!
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by Strat »

I really love seeing the band on a smaller stage like that compared to the big touring stage. FEels more intimate and makes them look and sound more like a garage band.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by VinylGuy »

oh, i loved it...it was flawed, but fucking awesome as well...gave me chills...and i dont care that much for the studio track...

That ending... :heartbeat:

FUCK YOU BOB, FUCK YOU FOR YOUR FADE OUTS-
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

harmless wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
The song wasn't sped up at all for this performance!
Naw I mean in general. The liklihood of ed knocking these songs out of the park night after night is greatly decreased when theres so much words and theyre playing em that fast id imagine. Im talking out my ass though maybe ed finds it easier/more fun.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
The song wasn't sped up at all for this performance!
Naw I mean in general. The liklihood of ed knocking these songs out of the park night after night is greatly decreased when theres so much words and theyre playing em that fast id imagine. Im talking out my ass though maybe ed finds it easier/more fun.
No, I agree. But the worst offenders ever were Ole! and Supersonic.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

evenslow wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
say something nice today. i dare you.
It was a good performance! Bands lookin hawt! I didnt think sirens was that bad!

I should have made my boardname 'negative nancy' huh.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
evenslow wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:shezalightnin bawlt! If he's struggling, it's because it's a clunky, cumbersome song. bleh.
It was a good performace of a clunky cumbersome song, which is the best we could have hoped for. Minus hoping for suprise! Badass b-side, or something.

It does baffle me that so many of these newer fast songs are so wordy, anyone singing it is gonna sound like a mushmouth. Add in pjs love for speeding shit up and well....
say something nice today. i dare you.
It was a good performance! Bands lookin hawt! I didnt think sirens was that bad!

I should have made my boardname 'negative nancy' huh.
You make a lot of sweeping generalisations. Get it? Sweeping? Mop? Sweeping?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by stupidmop »

I'll try to ......clean that shit up

Image
**WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH**
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Pearl Jam WEEK on Jimmy Fallon

Post by digster »

evenslow wrote:
digster wrote:I think it's way easier for up-tempo songs to translate into these types of television performances, though, both in terms of playing and watching them.
yeah the slow stuff doesn't utilize the band enough.
I think it's more that you don't really have that atmosphere you can get from hearing a slow song done in a theater or arena; you're basically just watching them stand still and do a song on television, and your interest on it will likely depend on your interest in the song. With the more up tempo stuff, you have the visual energy of the performance to latch onto.
Post Reply