Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Matter

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

How great is Dark Matter nearly a year after release?

Five Stars
23
30%
Four Stars
31
41%
Three Stars
14
18%
Two Stars
4
5%
Serban Ghanaea is the antichrist
4
5%
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by stip »

the morning after, and I do think this mix of running is better.
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Buby »

It's always an interesting listen when it comes to familiar material tweaked in some way.
Be it rearranged, remixed, remastered, covered, mashuped, etc.

I don't see any of these tracks replacing any of the originals, but I enjoyed the listen.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by digster »

I think something like 3 or (more likely) 3.5 seems about right to me. It's a significant step above some of my least favorite work by the band this century; I think it's ended up landing just above or around where S/T is in my rankings. I think that's probably pretty close to where it started; I only tend to go back to 4-5 songs from this with any regularity, but those 4-5 pop up often for me in listening to music.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by stip »

tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts? ;-)
why choose?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84843
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts? ;-)
People like the album, Trag.

Let it go
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84843
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
epilogue wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts? ;-)
People like the album, Trag.

Let it go
Never
My man!

:lol:
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by VinylGuy »

tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts? ;-)
Russian bots
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Leatherhead »

This album is so weird. I think it's good, but also it sucks.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36483
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Jorge »

Leatherhead wrote:This album is so weird. I think it's good, but also it sucks.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Kalevi
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu June 27, 2013 2:40 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Kalevi »

I'm not crazy about the production, but even though I saw this as a concept album at the time it was released, it hits the implications even harder now thanks to world/US events. A cautionary tale they refused to express explicitly.
sico_pata
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat August 10, 2013 5:40 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by sico_pata »

ridleybradout wrote:Ok, I was holding out posting this in respect for trag's upcoming Dark Matter remix (which I still hope gets completed one day as it will be a totally different beast anyway) but it's been almost a year now, so here it is.

This is a stereo mixdown of the 7.1 Dolby Atmos bluray version of Dark Matter (converted using Logic) that I found posted in a comment on redacted.sh last year. Some of you may have come across it there or elsewhere too.

It is light years ahead of the 'regular' stereo mix - better separation, more dynamic, and with some of the Wattish sheen taken off (though the drums still don't sound as good as they should).

Between this version and the Apple Dolby Atmos mix, I don't think I've actually listened to the 'original stereo' mix since it first came out. I just went back to it after reading the above comments and it hurt my ears - it sounds like a 90's MP3 downloaded from Napster :shake:

So enough is enough - download this version and never look back :thumbsup:
I have found a BD 2024 TrueHD 24-48 8CH. It's better or same as 7.1 mix? both are Flac files but first one is 1,3GB vs 300MB
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Ms Harmless »

Got to Give is top tier for me at the moment
User avatar
lvc
Huge WNBA Fan
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by lvc »

ridleybradout wrote:Ok, I was holding out posting this in respect for trag's upcoming Dark Matter remix (which I still hope gets completed one day as it will be a totally different beast anyway) but it's been almost a year now, so here it is.

This is a stereo mixdown of the 7.1 Dolby Atmos bluray version of Dark Matter (converted using Logic) that I found posted in a comment on redacted.sh last year. Some of you may have come across it there or elsewhere too.

It is light years ahead of the 'regular' stereo mix - better separation, more dynamic, and with some of the Wattish sheen taken off (though the drums still don't sound as good as they should).

Between this version and the Apple Dolby Atmos mix, I don't think I've actually listened to the 'original stereo' mix since it first came out. I just went back to it after reading the above comments and it hurt my ears - it sounds like a 90's MP3 downloaded from Napster :shake:

So enough is enough - download this version and never look back :thumbsup:
How do you listen to this? I'm listening to Scared of Fear and All I hear is Jeff and Matt and that is abso-fruitin-lootly not why I listen to Pearl Jam. It sounds like the Atmos version pretty much, which sounded so bad in my car that both my son and I thought something was broken. Like I imagine Jeff and Matt chloroforming everyone in the mixing booth and making this mix before they wake up while twirling their snidely whiplash staches.

Sorry, I'm pretty cranky today.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by stip »

yea, after my first few listens i havent gone back to that mix. i accept that there are flaws with the official mix, but this is just swapping out problems

i did like running, though
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by Jaeti »

It also reminded me of the Atmos mix: more bass, some echo effects. But I don't recall the Atmos mix losing the guitars the way this one does, so I also haven't gone back to it.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by stip »

the echo is kind of cool on dark matter
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma

Post by ridleybradout »

sico_pata wrote: I have found a BD 2024 TrueHD 24-48 8CH. It's better or same as 7.1 mix? both are Flac files but first one is 1,3GB vs 300MB
Same - the 1.3GB one is the raw 8 channel (i.e. 7.1) rip that was used to create the 'stereo mixdown' version (300MB).
Post Reply