Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Matter
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
the morning after, and I do think this mix of running is better.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Buby
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2775
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: West of Deedle
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
It's always an interesting listen when it comes to familiar material tweaked in some way.
Be it rearranged, remixed, remastered, covered, mashuped, etc.
I don't see any of these tracks replacing any of the originals, but I enjoyed the listen.
Be it rearranged, remixed, remastered, covered, mashuped, etc.
I don't see any of these tracks replacing any of the originals, but I enjoyed the listen.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
I think something like 3 or (more likely) 3.5 seems about right to me. It's a significant step above some of my least favorite work by the band this century; I think it's ended up landing just above or around where S/T is in my rankings. I think that's probably pretty close to where it started; I only tend to go back to 4-5 songs from this with any regularity, but those 4-5 pop up often for me in listening to music.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
why choose?tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts?
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
People like the album, Trag.tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts?
Let it go
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84842
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
My man!tragabigzanda wrote:Neverepilogue wrote:People like the album, Trag.tragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts?
Let it go
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42757
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Russian botstragabigzanda wrote:Big shift in the poll results, suggesting continued love for this album. Is it the result of transient posters showing up for stip’s tournament, or did stip finally figure out a chatbot swarm macro for his multiple accounts?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Leatherhead
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4280
- Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
This album is so weird. I think it's good, but also it sucks.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36483
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Leatherhead wrote:This albumis so weird. I think it's good, but also itsucks.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
Kalevi
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Thu June 27, 2013 2:40 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
I'm not crazy about the production, but even though I saw this as a concept album at the time it was released, it hits the implications even harder now thanks to world/US events. A cautionary tale they refused to express explicitly.
-
sico_pata
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat August 10, 2013 5:40 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
I have found a BD 2024 TrueHD 24-48 8CH. It's better or same as 7.1 mix? both are Flac files but first one is 1,3GB vs 300MBridleybradout wrote:Ok, I was holding out posting this in respect for trag's upcoming Dark Matter remix (which I still hope gets completed one day as it will be a totally different beast anyway) but it's been almost a year now, so here it is.
This is a stereo mixdown of the 7.1 Dolby Atmos bluray version of Dark Matter (converted using Logic) that I found posted in a comment on redacted.sh last year. Some of you may have come across it there or elsewhere too.
It is light years ahead of the 'regular' stereo mix - better separation, more dynamic, and with some of the Wattish sheen taken off (though the drums still don't sound as good as they should).
Between this version and the Apple Dolby Atmos mix, I don't think I've actually listened to the 'original stereo' mix since it first came out. I just went back to it after reading the above comments and it hurt my ears - it sounds like a 90's MP3 downloaded from Napster![]()
So enough is enough - download this version and never look back
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Got to Give is top tier for me at the moment
- lvc
- Huge WNBA Fan
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
- Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
How do you listen to this? I'm listening to Scared of Fear and All I hear is Jeff and Matt and that is abso-fruitin-lootly not why I listen to Pearl Jam. It sounds like the Atmos version pretty much, which sounded so bad in my car that both my son and I thought something was broken. Like I imagine Jeff and Matt chloroforming everyone in the mixing booth and making this mix before they wake up while twirling their snidely whiplash staches.ridleybradout wrote:Ok, I was holding out posting this in respect for trag's upcoming Dark Matter remix (which I still hope gets completed one day as it will be a totally different beast anyway) but it's been almost a year now, so here it is.
This is a stereo mixdown of the 7.1 Dolby Atmos bluray version of Dark Matter (converted using Logic) that I found posted in a comment on redacted.sh last year. Some of you may have come across it there or elsewhere too.
It is light years ahead of the 'regular' stereo mix - better separation, more dynamic, and with some of the Wattish sheen taken off (though the drums still don't sound as good as they should).
Between this version and the Apple Dolby Atmos mix, I don't think I've actually listened to the 'original stereo' mix since it first came out. I just went back to it after reading the above comments and it hurt my ears - it sounds like a 90's MP3 downloaded from Napster![]()
So enough is enough - download this version and never look back
Sorry, I'm pretty cranky today.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
yea, after my first few listens i havent gone back to that mix. i accept that there are flaws with the official mix, but this is just swapping out problems
i did like running, though
i did like running, though
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
It also reminded me of the Atmos mix: more bass, some echo effects. But I don't recall the Atmos mix losing the guitars the way this one does, so I also haven't gone back to it.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
the echo is kind of cool on dark matter
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: Challenge the recency bias/new albumitis: Rerank Dark Ma
Same - the 1.3GB one is the raw 8 channel (i.e. 7.1) rip that was used to create the 'stereo mixdown' version (300MB).sico_pata wrote: I have found a BD 2024 TrueHD 24-48 8CH. It's better or same as 7.1 mix? both are Flac files but first one is 1,3GB vs 300MB