Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Dark Matter

5 Stars
119
56%
4 Stars
66
31%
3 Stars
18
9%
2 Stars
2
1%
2 Star
1
0%
%#*! Andrew Watt
5
2%
 
Total votes: 211

User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5355
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by daft twat »

Happy 1 year anniversary to a great record!
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Ms Harmless »

Leatherhead wrote:The problem with DM is that it's too easily digestible. Like, if I wanted to turn a Foo Fighters fan onto Pearl Jam, I would show them this album.
I'll take "easily digestible" in these future days over "tried to be interesting but failed miserably"
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by McParadigm »

I reeeeeally like this record.

But also

It’s kind of what I’d expect an AI of the superfuture to produce, if the prompt was “create a Pearl Jam record.”

How can both be true and what does it mean?
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

it is essentialist pearl jam. The core DNA. so at once true to who they are and the seed bed for what you would reproduce if you wanted to sound like them
User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5355
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by daft twat »

What I liked best about it was the band was visibly proud and excited to play the songs live.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

daft twat wrote:What I liked best about it was the band was visibly proud and excited to play the songs live.
How is that different from any "new" album?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
stip wrote:it is essentialist pearl jam. The core DNA. so at once true to who they are and the seed bed for what you would reproduce if you wanted to sound like them
Depends on your definition of “core DNA.” By my definition, this is an entirely inessential, and wholly derivative, Pearl Jam album. It’s Lightning Bolt with better songs but worse production.
Lightning Bolt isn't essential PJ "core DNA" if that helps
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
daft twat
Rank This Poster
Posts: 5355
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:23 am
Location: The In Between

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by daft twat »

epilogue wrote:
daft twat wrote:What I liked best about it was the band was visibly proud and excited to play the songs live.
How is that different from any "new" album?
I never got that sense at any Backspacer or Lightning Bolt shows. They’d obligatorily trot out a few songs from those albums, and it was mainly the same handful.

I saw 9 shows between Backspacer and Lightning Bolt and never saw Gonna See My Friend, Force of Nature, or Speed of Sound. That’s 1/4 of the album. To this day, I’ve seen Johnny Guitar, Supersonic, and The End each just once.

I saw 16 shows between the release of Lightning Bolt and Gigaton and I never My Father’s Son, LTRP, Swallowed Whole, or Yellow Moon once. That’s a third of the album. Getaway and Infallible I saw just once each during that time and never since.

I only saw 4 shows between Gigaton and Dark Matter. Haven’t seen a third of that one either, but the circumstances are obviously way different.

Meanwhile, they played 9 of 11 songs on Dark Matter the first show I saw. In 3 shows, I saw the whole album and 8 of the songs at least twice. It’s completely different, and it feels different at the shows. They’re confident in those songs next to the setlist regulars in their catalog.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

this album's greatness is inversely proportional to Trag's loathing of it.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

daft twat wrote:
epilogue wrote:
daft twat wrote:What I liked best about it was the band was visibly proud and excited to play the songs live.
How is that different from any "new" album?
I never got that sense at any Backspacer or Lightning Bolt shows. They’d obligatorily trot out a few songs from those albums, and it was mainly the same handful.

I saw 9 shows between Backspacer and Lightning Bolt and never saw Gonna See My Friend, Force of Nature, or Speed of Sound. That’s 1/4 of the album. To this day, I’ve seen Johnny Guitar, Supersonic, and The End each just once.

I saw 16 shows between the release of Lightning Bolt and Gigaton and I never My Father’s Son, LTRP, Swallowed Whole, or Yellow Moon once. That’s a third of the album. Getaway and Infallible I saw just once each during that time and never since.

I only saw 4 shows between Gigaton and Dark Matter. Haven’t seen a third of that one either, but the circumstances are obviously way different.

Meanwhile, they played 9 of 11 songs on Dark Matter the first show I saw. In 3 shows, I saw the whole album and 8 of the songs at least twice. It’s completely different, and it feels different at the shows. They’re confident in those songs next to the setlist regulars in their catalog.
yeah, totally.

Gigaton was hurt with the pandemic and thats a shame, but they totally dived into DM live last year. And it was fucking glorious too, wish i could have seen them last year!

Hopefully that will change soon.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

tragabigzanda wrote:
stip wrote:it is essentialist pearl jam. The core DNA. so at once true to who they are and the seed bed for what you would reproduce if you wanted to sound like them
Depends on your definition of “core DNA.” By my definition, this is an entirely inessential, and wholly derivative, Pearl Jam album. It’s Lightning Bolt with better songs but worse production.
Spot on.

At least the band wrote their own songs on Lightning Bolt.
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by Jaeti »

tragabigzanda wrote:I loathe this album yet I agree — they did seem to relish in exploring these songs live noticeably more than the last couple albums.
I thought you loathed the production but generally thought the songs were solid. Granted, it's been a year.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

When are we going to be Trag free in this thread?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
armogi
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun December 03, 2017 5:33 am

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by armogi »

Trag is totally right, there is a reason why they bring watt in and it’s not for his recording skills.
Exhibit b: The Rolling Stones
Exhibit c: Ozzy

U2 is next (at some point)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

the production on the record is loud, even overwhelming, but I think it still works for the majority of songs (wont tell and wreckage are probably the least well served by it) which try to capture the feeling of holding onto something of value in a world that keeps trying to take it from you.

But i think it is better than ST or Lightning Bolt. The former is so harsh all the songs after the first three loose their warmth and depth, and LBolt is anisceptic and strips the character of what is an underrated set of songs.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Dark Matter: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

the production on the record is loud, even overwhelming, but I think it still works for the majority of songs (wont tell and wreckage are probably the least well served by it) which try to capture the feeling of holding onto something of value in a world that keeps trying to take it from you.

But i think it is better than ST or Lightning Bolt. The former is so harsh all the songs after the first three loose their warmth and depth, and LBolt is anisceptic and strips the character of what is an underrated set of songs.
Post Reply