TV: Survivor

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

Finally got caught up last night. Chrissy sealed her own fate. Bro Stuntman just came off as MAGA Entitled. It would’ve been the perfect time to blindside that motherfucker.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

Everybody still voting for Season 50 stuff?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28033
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by Monkey_Driven »

This next episode is the time for people to flip against the "strong alliance". Shauhin should lead the charge.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

The previews for this week seemed to indicate they’re all starting to have a problem with Stuntman.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Welp
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

Finally
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
scrub12
AnalLog
Posts: 1941
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 4:56 am

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by scrub12 »

This season got awful real fast.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Yeah it’s kind of lame
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28033
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Sort of an old school vibe to it
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by blueviper »

They should have taken out Eva. She wouldn’t have expected it and it gets rid of her advantages.


Lol David. I thought his stare was goofy. Now this.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

blueviper wrote:They should have taken out Eva. She wouldn’t have expected it and it gets rid of her advantages.


Lol David. I thought his stare was goofy. Now this.
How immature do you have to be to think you look "tough" or "mad" doing what David is doing? What a tool.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by blueviper »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
blueviper wrote:They should have taken out Eva. She wouldn’t have expected it and it gets rid of her advantages.


Lol David. I thought his stare was goofy. Now this.
How immature do you have to be to think you look "tough" or "mad" doing what David is doing? What a tool.
I can only imagine what his jury question will be to the final three
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
blueviper wrote:They should have taken out Eva. She wouldn’t have expected it and it gets rid of her advantages.


Lol David. I thought his stare was goofy. Now this.
How immature do you have to be to think you look "tough" or "mad" doing what David is doing? What a tool.
Wearing those tank tops every time, too.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Would be awesome if Mitch could snag an immunity or two and make it to the end. I think he wins if he does.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

I like Mitch, but I’ve been pulling for Joe from the get go. If it’s not him, Team Mitch all the way.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by blueviper »

For some reason Joe and Eva are rubbing me the wrong way. I think that it's their cocky attitude that they think they are immune to being voted out, or the perceived cockiness I see on screen.

I think I would like Mitch, Kyle or Kamila to win.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

blueviper wrote:For some reason Joe and Eva are rubbing me the wrong way. I think that it's their cocky attitude that they think they are immune to being voted out, or the perceived cockiness I see on screen.

I think I would like Mitch, Kyle or Kamila to win.
Same. I used to like Joe and Eva, but they are getting cocky. And you know they will take each other to the finale given the chance, so if that happens, it will be the other person that will win because the jury won't vote for either of them in that instance. It will not be a wise decision. One of them needs to hope the other gets voted out
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by wease »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
blueviper wrote:For some reason Joe and Eva are rubbing me the wrong way. I think that it's their cocky attitude that they think they are immune to being voted out, or the perceived cockiness I see on screen.

I think I would like Mitch, Kyle or Kamila to win.
Same. I used to like Joe and Eva, but they are getting cocky. And you know they will take each other to the finale given the chance, so if that happens, it will be the other person that will win because the jury won't vote for either of them in that instance. It will not be a wise decision. One of them needs to hope the other gets voted out
I think the cockiness is coming more from Eva than Joe. Joe was plenty worried when he was being told the lie about Shauhin having an idol. Now Eva, she doesn’t see any way at all that she’s getting voted out, but I think Joe has the maturity to understand he could be gone in an instant. If he was smart, he’d go ahead and get rid of her at the next tribal because as you say, if they both make the finals, that third person is going to win.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I’m happy with the winner
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: TV: Survivor

Post by blueviper »

Yes. Good choice.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
Post Reply