yeah, thats a banger live. Wish they did it more often. I would love for them to also play Life Wasted, Unemployable and at least Inside Job on a regular basis.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Hearing Severed Hand last night was so great. And they nailed it. The crowd seemed to love it as well. More from this album, please.
Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42757
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Anders wrote:They had some good things going for them in this period, but ultimately, the album was a disappointment.
It just didn’t work did it? All felt so forced and contrived.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10365
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42757
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
yeah, the only issue i have is the production. Everything else, i love it. The album, the tour cycle, the fucking press!! they did rolling stone, snl, letterman were they played a whole set, Aol sessions, Jolls Holland...magic.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10365
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
I think we have similar thoughts here. If it had a little character, be it the warm sound of No Code, the abrasive sound of Vitalogy, or even the murkiness of Riot Act, it would have a feeling to it rather than seemingly antiseptic which the album is definitely not going for in substance.wease wrote:Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Yeah. Comes across like a flat thud.liebzz wrote:I think we have similar thoughts here. If it had a little character, be it the warm sound of No Code, the abrasive sound of Vitalogy, or even the murkiness of Riot Act, it would have a feeling to it rather than seemingly antiseptic which the album is definitely not going for in substance.wease wrote:Heavier but brighter, perhaps. Instead of tin can, I’ve always thought cardboard box. There’s no real ambiance to it at all.liebzz wrote:It might have felt forced and contrived because it was the biggest departure from their trajectory over the course of 15 years, but I disagree that the album was a disappointment. The biggest problem with the album is that the sound always seemed off to me - these heavy songs that sounded like they were in a tin can or something. This needed a heavier mix, if that makes sense.
I still love most of the tunes tho.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
It is a shame because all of the ST songs I've seen live have always been fun and incredible. Such a huge difference between the album and live. Also, I wish they'd bring Comatose back!
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Inside Job in particular is a song that is just fine on the record and kills live
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
in fact Inside Job may be the single song most elevated in a live setting.
that or Unthought Known
that or Unthought Known
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42757
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
yeah, thats another one i would love to have it live...Big Wave too.E.H. Ruddock wrote:It is a shame because all of the ST songs I've seen live have always been fun and incredible. Such a huge difference between the album and live. Also, I wish they'd bring Comatose back!
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Binaural is up there for me tooKevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
even parachutes?Kevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Hmmm, good call...coin toss, but I think so. Listening to the studio version now (whatever mix is on YouTube), and I am not sure I'd ever realized that Ed's vocals were double-tracked throughout the song. The instrumental embellishments come across really nice on the studio recording, but I think I still prefer the more organic feel of a good live take (if memory serves, Torino '06 is the one to take to the bank).stip wrote:even parachutes?Kevin Davis wrote:I think every S/T song is better live (or at least, was better live in 2006). I'm not sure that any other PJ studio record has been so completely displaced by live recordings for me.
For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40165
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Yeah. Except for Insignificance, which I loved from first listen as the b-side of NAIS, I wasn’t very keen on much else from the studio. Then those boots started coming out and more and more I started really getting into the tunes. And now I consider it a masterpiece.Kevin Davis wrote:For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
Interestingly, Sad was a tune I didn’t care one way or the other about until I saw it live for the first time at the Gorge in ‘05. After that, it moved up into top 10 and possibly top 5 for me. I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10365
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Yeah that’s completely normal to me. I didn’t care either way about Bruce Springsteen and went to see him because of his live reputation. Walked out of that show a huge fan for life.wease wrote:Yeah. Except for Insignificance, which I loved from first listen as the b-side of NAIS, I wasn’t very keen on much else from the studio. Then those boots started coming out and more and more I started really getting into the tunes. And now I consider it a masterpiece.Kevin Davis wrote:For sure. Though, with Binaural, I do think the studio record and the live takes offer very different experiences. With S/T, for most of the songs, the live versions just deliver in full something that the record only delivers about 80% of.wease wrote:Binaural is up there for me too
I'm with you, though. The 2000 bootlegs really opened up my fondness for the Binaural songs in a big way.
Interestingly, Sad was a tune I didn’t care one way or the other about until I saw it live for the first time at the Gorge in ‘05. After that, it moved up into top 10 and possibly top 5 for me. I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
That’s funny. I went to see Springsteen on the reunion tour, and left thinking “huh, I wonder what people get out of that.” Then one day I was on a CD buying binge and I bought The River.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Happy Trees
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Sat April 22, 2023 2:59 am
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
It's because the production on the studio album sucked. And it has never sucked worse than it sucks right now.wease wrote:I don’t know why I seem to connect with things on a seemingly different level with live performances vs studio cuts.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10365
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Pearl Jam (self titled): Official Album Thread
Good ol’ Columbia House.McParadigm wrote:That’s funny. I went to see Springsteen on the reunion tour, and left thinking “huh, I wonder what people get out of that.” Then one day I was on a CD buying binge and I bought The River.