Movie: 28 Years Later now with more Bone Temple (1-16-26)
- AndySlash
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:42 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
kind of surprised there isn’t more talk about this. agreed that it is terrific. i had only seen the one main trailer, and still wasn’t really sure what to expect and i went in with tempered hopes, but whatever reservations i might have had were erased pretty quickly. it doesn’t rehash the old movies, it definitely takes some chances, and for me at least i just had a lot of fun watching it. most of all - especially with the ending - i am really curious and excited to see what’s next.
ah, copperplate, a font for the truly modern man.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Ensign9
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Sat January 12, 2013 7:19 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
I'd say it's more thriller/drama versus horror, at least compared to the first two movies. Unless you're horrified by giant zombie dong in your face.Bi_3 wrote:I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
deep substrate foliated kalkite
- lvc
- Huge WNBA Fan
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
- Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
So there's a lot of naked zombies, then?Ensign9 wrote:I'd say it's more thriller/drama versus horror, at least compared to the first two movies. Unless you're horrified by giant zombie dong in your face.Bi_3 wrote:I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
- Ensign9
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Sat January 12, 2013 7:19 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Technically, I think there are three.lvc wrote:So there's a lot of naked zombies, then?Ensign9 wrote:I'd say it's more thriller/drama versus horror, at least compared to the first two movies. Unless you're horrified by giant zombie dong in your face.Bi_3 wrote:I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
deep substrate foliated kalkite
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
absolutely incredible film, already pre-ordered it on Prime
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Let me check my search history...Ensign9 wrote:I'd say it's more thriller/drama versus horror, at least compared to the first two movies. Unless you're horrified by giant zombie dong in your face.Bi_3 wrote:I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Apparently I'm cool with it.Bi_3 wrote:Let me check my search history...Ensign9 wrote:I'd say it's more thriller/drama versus horror, at least compared to the first two movies. Unless you're horrified by giant zombie dong in your face.Bi_3 wrote:I'm pretty hyped to see it, but I'm not into seeing horror in the theater. The audience ruins it for me.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84843
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
This is a movie full of ideas and bold choices. I'm not sure all of them work but the care and craft are clear. Garland is wrestling with some major themes. I wonder how much he regrets the first film in terms of what he had to say then about humanity. Because this is a stark and stunning about-face. And I'm fucking here for it.
And how are we not talking about Power Rangers at all in this thread?!
And how are we not talking about Power Rangers at all in this thread?!
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
i havent seen the first one in a long time, and i didnt quite liked it at time, was he hinting about a miserable humanity? dont remember.epilogue wrote:This is a movie full of ideas and books choices. I'm not sure all of them work but the care and craft are clear. Garland is tracking with some major themes. I wonder how much he regrets the first film in terms of what he had to say then about humanity. Because this is a stark and stunning about-face. And I'm fucking here for it.
And how are we not talking about Power Rangers at all in this thread?!
Yeah those dudes will be interesting in the sequels...i read some theories that were mmm frightening
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84843
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
The first film has a pretty bleak and uncharitable take on humanity. Fienne's character in this is essentially the mirror/opposite of Eccleston's character in the first one.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Interesting.
Yeah i love that twist. Specially when everyone in the village, which is supposed to be a nice community, basically believes another type of religion.
I liked that science vs religion side of it.
Yeah i love that twist. Specially when everyone in the village, which is supposed to be a nice community, basically believes another type of religion.
I liked that science vs religion side of it.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Ensign9
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Sat January 12, 2013 7:19 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
What category does the zombie dong fall under?VinylGuy wrote:I liked that science vs religion side of it.
deep substrate foliated kalkite
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Eccleston was the military guy right? he was kind of the villain; I loved that message of "militarised human violence is the real enemy", and I liked that 28 Weeks expanded on that theme by bringing the Americans in to save the dayepilogue wrote:The first film has a pretty bleak and uncharitable take on humanity. Fienne's character in this is essentially the mirror/opposite of Eccleston's character in the first one.
-
Ms Harmless
- She / Her
- Posts: 13605
- Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Warwickshire, UK
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
if there's any more "bleak" to come, I think it will come from the Jimmy cult; the film has already examined toxic masculinity in this film but looks to be heading forward to more spiritual themes, as VG says
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84843
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
I'm having a hard time unpacking the Power Rangers of it all. Does anyone have thoughts about that? Or has anyone read any articles that dig into that?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84843
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
Totally!Ms Harmless wrote:Eccleston was the military guy right? he was kind of the villain; I loved that message of "militarised human violence is the real enemy", and I liked that 28 Weeks expanded on that theme by bringing the Americans in to save the dayepilogue wrote:The first film has a pretty bleak and uncharitable take on humanity. Fienne's character in this is essentially the mirror/opposite of Eccleston's character in the first one.
I love how Eccelston is presented as a hero (the army will save us!) and reveals himself to be a sort of nihilistic villain.
And then in this one, Fiennes is sold as a dangerous, insane villain that then reveals himself to be a healer, kind and empathic. He's a sort of hero.
He could kill Sampson. But he never does. Even as Sampson tries to kill him. It's a fascinating turn. Fiennes' relationship to his infected vs the way Eccelston treats his. I love that stuff.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Movie: 28 Years Later (6-30-25)
I read a few theoriesepilogue wrote:I'm having a hard time unpacking the Power Rangers of it all. Does anyone have thoughts about that? Or has anyone read any articles that dig into that?
- Spoiler: show
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.