Worst living person on Earth

[VinylGuy]

James Corden or Argo´s nemesis.

Tate´s too stupid

[Peeps]

that guy Greg? in idaho

[LoathedVermin72]

That's the LostProphets guy right?

He's up there

Yup. His crimes are the most heinous I’ve ever read about.

I would argue that piles of shit like him or Peter Scully are on a different level of harm magnitude than pretty much any capitalist politician or billionaire, to be honest. As horrific as their crimes are, they ultimately affect a much smaller group of people.

[Jorge]

And much smaller people

Making this post made me feel bad

[Strat]

People who back into parking spots.

[Chris_H_2]

that woman on the left side of the escalator this morning texting and holding everyone up that wanted to walk up. she is the worst person living on earth.

[epilogue]

For a board so obsessed with "we have a thread for that" it's weird how many of you are ignoring the OP and treating this like the "rational hatred" thread. I'm sorry you have a private pet peeve that makes you crazy, but this thread is about the literal worst person on Earth. Not run of the mill, everyday, inconsiderate, asshats.

Get it together, RM!

[doug rr]

Brittany Mahomes

[epilogue]

I'm sorry she turned you down, doug, but that's no reason to lash out.

[wease]

She wishes she could turn Doug down.

[Ello Sailor]

For a board so obsessed with "we have a thread for that" it's weird how many of you are ignoring the OP and treating this like the "rational hatred" thread. I'm sorry you have a private pet peeve that makes you crazy, but this thread is about the literal worst person on Earth. Not run of the mill, everyday, inconsiderate, asshats.

Get it together, RM!

Maybe it's this guy. What a chode.

[epilogue]

For a board so obsessed with "we have a thread for that" it's weird how many of you are ignoring the OP and treating this like the "rational hatred" thread. I'm sorry you have a private pet peeve that makes you crazy, but this thread is about the literal worst person on Earth. Not run of the mill, everyday, inconsiderate, asshats.

Get it together, RM!

Maybe it's this guy. What a chode.

Of course

[Dev]

Argo or Lena Dunham

[Jorge]

Argo or Lena Dunham

I hear they're dating

[daft twat]

That's the LostProphets guy right?

He's up there

Yup. His crimes are the most heinous I’ve ever read about.

I would argue that piles of shit like him or Peter Scully are on a different level of harm magnitude than pretty much any capitalist politician or billionaire, to be honest. As horrific as their crimes are, they ultimately affect a much smaller group of people.

This is really the philosophical conundrum this thread poses. Dictators and sweatshop overseers hurt many more people than a rapist, but to commit a rape is so much more visceral and personal. It’s one thing to know your actions are hurting someone or even many people; it’s quite another to look your victim in the eyes and inflict the torture. That’s an evil I cannot comprehend.

[Peeps]

aside from pedos and rapists candace owens is certainly top 5 right?

[Jorge]

That's the LostProphets guy right?

He's up there

Yup. His crimes are the most heinous I’ve ever read about.

I would argue that piles of shit like him or Peter Scully are on a different level of harm magnitude than pretty much any capitalist politician or billionaire, to be honest. As horrific as their crimes are, they ultimately affect a much smaller group of people.

This is really the philosophical conundrum this thread poses. Dictators and sweatshop overseers hurt many more people than a rapist, but to commit a rape is so much more visceral and personal. It’s one thing to know your actions are hurting someone or even many people; it’s quite another to look your victim in the eyes and inflict the torture. That’s an evil I cannot comprehend.

People in seats of inscrutable power who hurt and exploit others are often able to, through ideology or abstraction, frame themselves as morally righteous or as working towards some greater good. There's a kind of psychological distance that allows for plausible deniability even to themselves. But someone like Watkins can't claim that. There's no framework, no illusion, that makes what he did anything other than pure, conscious malice. That kind of evil is direct and undeniable, which makes it especially horrifying.

If we're judging by scale of harm, people in power (dictators, exploitative billionaires, architects of war or systemic oppression) will always top the list. But if we're talking intent and personal depravity, Watkins and his ilk represent a kind of evil that's more intimate and psychologically shocking because he has nothing to hide behind, he has no way to lie to himself or anyone else.

[LoathedVermin72]

That's the LostProphets guy right?

He's up there

Yup. His crimes are the most heinous I’ve ever read about.

I would argue that piles of shit like him or Peter Scully are on a different level of harm magnitude than pretty much any capitalist politician or billionaire, to be honest. As horrific as their crimes are, they ultimately affect a much smaller group of people.

This is really the philosophical conundrum this thread poses. Dictators and sweatshop overseers hurt many more people than a rapist, but to commit a rape is so much more visceral and personal. It’s one thing to know your actions are hurting someone or even many people; it’s quite another to look your victim in the eyes and inflict the torture. That’s an evil I cannot comprehend.

People in seats of inscrutable power who hurt and exploit others are often able to, through ideology or abstraction, frame themselves as morally righteous or as working towards some greater good. There's a kind of psychological distance that allows for plausible deniability even to themselves. But someone like Watkins can't claim that. There's no framework, no illusion, that makes what he did anything other than pure, conscious malice. That kind of evil is direct and undeniable, which makes it especially horrifying.

If we're judging by scale of harm, people in power (dictators, exploitative billionaires, architects of war or systemic oppression) will always top the list. But if we're talking intent and personal depravity, Watkins and his ilk represent a kind of evil that's more intimate and psychologically shocking because he has nothing to hide behind, he has no way to lie to himself or anyone else.

See, for me, it's the other way around. Intimate, one-on-one cruelty is pretty easy for me to understand. That stuff doesn't shock me. That, I expect. What I have always had trouble understanding is the mentality that drives the ruling class to be so profoundly evil. The "fuck everyone else as long as I get mine" mentality. I've always had difficulty understanding that kind of thinking. Maybe it's because I've been exposed to the former kind of evil since I was young but I only really became conscious of the scale of the latter much more recently, so I've had less time to think about and process it.

Something that did make me understand a bit more was the movie Welcome to New York. The way it locates the loss of idealism and embrace of hopelessness that informs the ideology of political realism kinda made me think, "Shit, is this really all that's driving these assholes?" Extremely depressing but probably accurate.

[Peeps]

this guy

[Anders]

Putin