evenslow wrote:How do you not warm up your voice for a heavily promoted performance at the end of PEARL JAM WEEK on a major network?
Ed don't give no fuck!
evenslow wrote:How do you not warm up your voice for a heavily promoted performance at the end of PEARL JAM WEEK on a major network?
Nope.southp wrote:Was there confirmation of an SNL appearance?VinylGuy wrote:I hope they play MYM and Getaway in SNL.
Either that or the shitty youtube audio quality has me thinking he's better than he actually was. It's very difficult to go from sounding hoarse to singing so well (or vice versa) unless he sounded hoarse because of some temporary issue, i.e. not warming up. Still not sure if Fallon was recorded after this show or before. If it's after, maybe Ed was just exhausted. Though it's still a big difference for a day or two.Strat wrote:evenslow wrote:How do you not warm up your voice for a heavily promoted performance at the end of PEARL JAM WEEK on a major network?
Ed don't give no fuck!
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
gems and rhinestones wrote:For the last several years, I've thought Ed has sounded a bit off in TV performances. Then on second and third listen, it starts to sound better. By about the fifth time I think he sounds pretty good. So I think my nerves of wanting him to sound great, fucks with my head. I didn't think Sirens sounded very good but now I think it sounds just fine. Weird I know.
evenslow wrote:Just imagine how the 43rd time through will sound.
I know we've done this to death, but intangibles in this context really means a mix of reverb, volume and simply hearing what your brain expects to hear.stip wrote:that's true. On the other hand, the audience copies often add some of the intangibles that get swept out of the cleaner recordings.
This, basically.digster wrote:I think youtube and audience videos in general can cover up issues that may be more apparent on a cleaner recording like Fallon's. The room, as well as the sound quality on the video lets our minds plug the gaps a bit.
this may sound stupid but hopefully you know what I mean. How ed physically sounded is only part of the experience. An important part for sure. Obviously the most important part. But not the only part.Birds in Hell wrote:I know we've done this to death, but intangibles in this context really means a mix of reverb, volume and simply hearing what your brain expects to hear.stip wrote:that's true. On the other hand, the audience copies often add some of the intangibles that get swept out of the cleaner recordings.
What you hear on something like Fallon or the official boots is the most accurate representation of how Ed actually sung when all those other things are removed.
I haven't really listened to the Sirens performance but Ed's voice certainly is a lot weaker in some respects than it once was, there's no sense pretending otherwise.
This, basically.digster wrote:I think youtube and audience videos in general can cover up issues that may be more apparent on a cleaner recording like Fallon's. The room, as well as the sound quality on the video lets our minds plug the gaps a bit.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
theplatypus wrote:Rank the metaphysical parts of the experience.
air conditioning/dry air?Release_Me wrote:Even taking into account how youtube performances may not be an accurate reflection of how Ed actually sung, you can hear him sound much better than he did on Fallon. He sounded very hoarse there and no matter how distorted the audio may get on phone recordings, the hoarseness can't be completely concealed. There are similar recordings of him on youtube where he does sound hoarse. I'm not judging the performance because this isn't a good enough quality recording but I can at least hear how he sounds. And it's a mystery to me how different it is from Fallon.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
I think I already posted this, but in all seriousness I have seen so many bands do bad TV appearances, and I think it's because of 2 reasons:harmless wrote:Ed sounded bad on TV but we're still trying to determine in what way, and on which song he sounded worse.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour