Mumford & Sons

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!




There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.
User avatar
matt reeder
AnalLog
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by matt reeder »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote: There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.
You just summarized everything I hate about this band better than I ever could have. :thumbsup:
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by harmless »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!




There are a number of comments on page 2 that question how one could find something so inoffensive and unremarkable so deserving of hatred, and I get that. But there has always just been some "it" factor about this band that has been particularly grating to me--a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords--I'm certainly pro-crazed abandon but give me a rock band that can actually make some noise. And I'd turn a blind eye to all of that if I thought their songs were any good, but I find them to be all fireworks and pomp. They are one of my least favorite major acts of the last 10 years.
I remember watching them play live on TV for the first time. At the time I was a big fan of their first album (still am, to an extent) so I was up for it. But as soon as I realised they played everything too fast, too excitedly, and in a way that geed up the crowd to ecstatic, frenzied levels, I found them to be an awkward mix of quaintly-British folk band and overly-emotional stadium rock band, and not incredibly successful at either thing. Jacks of all trades, masters of none. So their name seems appropriate.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by stip »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to?
Why do people ask this question? They have two albums--just listen for yourself and find out!
I have trouble working while I listen to music, unfortunately, and incredibly limited windows for listening to music. So I want to make sure the chances of a long term payoff are higher than usual.
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10260
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Stickman »

stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to? The first page said no, but then some of the defenders showed up.
Def worth listening. First album is solid, 2nd has a lil slower pace but still great.
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by fishbob »

Stickman wrote:
stip wrote:i just heard a song of theirs for the first time (Roll Away Your Stone) and I liked it. Is this a band worth listening to? The first page said no, but then some of the defenders showed up.
Def worth listening. First album is solid, 2nd has a lil slower pace but still great.
I would say no. There are plenty of bands that do this type of music a billion times better.
They're possibly the most repetitive bands I've ever listened to and they have dreadful lyrics.
I saw them live last year and what was surprising was that the songs that they used their "schtick" on were easily the worst. A few of the songs utilised a full kit/band set-up and they were 100x more interesting, diverse and exciting. I don't see why they don't stick to that some more.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by harmless »

I pretty much have the opposite opinion; I find their "rock" songs involving the whole kit to be the most generic.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
fishbob
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat March 09, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Down Under

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by fishbob »

Either way, they're not very good
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84845
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by epilogue »

I LOVE them. Their first album. Still one of my favorites. And I enjoy their second one.
User avatar
red calzolaio
AnalLog
Posts: 1478
Joined: Fri January 25, 2013 4:02 am

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by red calzolaio »

Listen to their music every once in awhile.

Seeing them live this summer was very underwhelming though.
User avatar
Soma.
AnalLog
Posts: 1362
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:17 pm
Location: On a live wire right up off the street.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Soma. »

stip wrote:...a combination of that guy's cocky, emotionless slur and that contrived "crescendo" effect that Harmless describes, that moment that 90% their songs inevitably arrive at where they're all just jumping up and down banging indiscriminately on open chords...
I laughed way too hard at this.
Self wrote:Every time I get to be a bachelor, I order Chinese. Twice a year, I gorge on broccoli 'n beef and crab rangoons. The guilt reminds me of masturbation. So does the rice.
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10260
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Stickman »

red calzolaio wrote:
Seeing them live this summer was very underwhelming though.

Just the opposite for me. They had the energy of a young PJ in them and the crowd was bouncin like Tiesto was on stage.
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10260
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Stickman »

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10260
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Stickman »

At the end of 2013 we went our separate ways to pursue our individual passions - be it playing professional football, getting into the catering industry, becoming an it-boy - and with each of our new careers quickly spiralling into bankruptcy and public disgrace, we had no choice but to reconvene and make a new album. So we spent 2014 writing and recording this record.

It's been a liberating and unifying experience for us as a band, and we're proud of what's come out. It was about songs, first and foremost. And then of course the sound we felt supported those songs best, which is what you will hear. We spent some time with our friend Aaron Dessner in New York (the album was half written in NY and half in London) then brought it to Mr Producer, James Ford. It was fun. Anyway, here it is... Our 3rd album.

Image
4th May 2015

"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Kevin Davis »

I wish bands would do away with this practice of announcing a "hiatus" just to account for the normal amount of time most artists take between albums anyway.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Strat »

Yea this is bullshit. I thought for certain they were going away forever.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by BurtReynolds »

It probably gets tiresome being constantly asked when the next album is coming out, though.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
BDB
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by BDB »

no banjo, no kick drum on this.
So at the very least it wont be Sigh no More III
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Jorge »

Stickman wrote:
So they're just Coldplay now
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: Mumford & Sons

Post by Alex »

almost every man in nashville aged 18-35 looks like a member of mumford and sons
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
Post Reply