Time to send Matt back to SG?

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by harmless »

Lament wrote:YOU THOUGHT YOU COULD EDIT THAT BEFORE IT WAS PRESERVED FOR ETERNITY, DIDN'T YOU HARMLESS?

:)
:gomez: :finger:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
hankholetsgo
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue September 10, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Washington, DC.

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by hankholetsgo »

harmless wrote:
hankholetsgo wrote:
harmless wrote:
hankholetsgo wrote:
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Strat wrote:what bothers me is "Matt is bored with pj" comments. They all stem from "yea, i just dont like this song, he is bored and he belongs in soundgarden, where is jack omg"
If there's someone in PJ who's bored or dissatisfied with it that someone is a complete moron. They don't need the money and each and all of them can do whatever they want artistically partly because they have the money to afford it.
And they are doing whatever they want artistically... in other bands.

You honestly believe they are not doing what they want in pearl jam?
I think that what they want for Pearl Jam is to "give the people what they want." So yes, and no. I think they're following their truly creative, artistic instincts with their side projects. I think Pearl Jam pays the bills. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy them. But that's where I think they are.
These guys are millionaires many times over... what bills are they worried about not paying?
Really? After all the talk about what PJ have to pay for, and all the talk about the commercial efforts they've gone to in recent years? You know the answer to that question. I don't think they *have* to be *worried*. They're rich as hell. And yet, money seems to be a motivator more and more. Don't ask me why, I'm not Pearl Jam.
Not that I care if they are still in it for the money or whatever, but commercial efforts also imply a desire to be liked, which is, from what I can tell, an important thing to them now. Or at least Ed.
Which doesn't contradict my argument in the slightest. I don't have to think a band is pulling out all the stops creatively, just because they "want to be liked". Otherwise I would be on a Miley Cyrus board.
Well there's an obvious comparison.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Strat wrote:what bothers me is "Matt is bored with pj" comments. They all stem from "yea, i just dont like this song, he is bored and he belongs in soundgarden, where is jack omg"
If there's someone in PJ who's bored or dissatisfied with it that someone is a complete moron. They don't need the money and each and all of them can do whatever they want artistically partly because they have the money to afford it.
And they are doing whatever they want artistically... in other bands.
and how the hell you know PJ isn't one of those bands? Because RM told you Stone Gossard thinks so?
Well, I think a lot of people on RM just have that opinion, man. Based on interviews, performances, songs, you name it. What gave you your opinion? It's irrelevant, really, isn't it? I certainly don't need RM to hand me an opinion.
You mean psychoanalysis of pictures with that right? Because that's what I'm seeing here.
WTF? What pictures?
every fucking band picture here is quoted in every post for at least 2 pages because everybody can tell from Stone's face he's dissatisfied with the band. 80% of his interviews and quotes get filtered out anyway because that would kind of get in the way of the image people have of him.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Lament »

harmless wrote: :gomez: :finger:
:cry:
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Strat »

How's everyone?
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Lament »

See the emoticon directly above your question.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Heathen »

Strat wrote:How's everyone?
psychoanalyze our pictures and find out
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by harmless »

hankholetsgo wrote:
harmless wrote:
hankholetsgo wrote:
harmless wrote:
hankholetsgo wrote:
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Strat wrote:what bothers me is "Matt is bored with pj" comments. They all stem from "yea, i just dont like this song, he is bored and he belongs in soundgarden, where is jack omg"
If there's someone in PJ who's bored or dissatisfied with it that someone is a complete moron. They don't need the money and each and all of them can do whatever they want artistically partly because they have the money to afford it.
And they are doing whatever they want artistically... in other bands.

You honestly believe they are not doing what they want in pearl jam?
I think that what they want for Pearl Jam is to "give the people what they want." So yes, and no. I think they're following their truly creative, artistic instincts with their side projects. I think Pearl Jam pays the bills. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy them. But that's where I think they are.
These guys are millionaires many times over... what bills are they worried about not paying?
Really? After all the talk about what PJ have to pay for, and all the talk about the commercial efforts they've gone to in recent years? You know the answer to that question. I don't think they *have* to be *worried*. They're rich as hell. And yet, money seems to be a motivator more and more. Don't ask me why, I'm not Pearl Jam.
Not that I care if they are still in it for the money or whatever, but commercial efforts also imply a desire to be liked, which is, from what I can tell, an important thing to them now. Or at least Ed.
Which doesn't contradict my argument in the slightest. I don't have to think a band is pulling out all the stops creatively, just because they "want to be liked". Otherwise I would be on a Miley Cyrus board.
Well there's an obvious comparison.
Musically, no. In their desire "to be liked", yes, absolutely there is.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by harmless »

Lament wrote:
harmless wrote: :gomez: :finger:
:cry:
:luv:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Strat wrote:what bothers me is "Matt is bored with pj" comments. They all stem from "yea, i just dont like this song, he is bored and he belongs in soundgarden, where is jack omg"
If there's someone in PJ who's bored or dissatisfied with it that someone is a complete moron. They don't need the money and each and all of them can do whatever they want artistically partly because they have the money to afford it.
And they are doing whatever they want artistically... in other bands.
and how the hell you know PJ isn't one of those bands? Because RM told you Stone Gossard thinks so?
Well, I think a lot of people on RM just have that opinion, man. Based on interviews, performances, songs, you name it. What gave you your opinion? It's irrelevant, really, isn't it? I certainly don't need RM to hand me an opinion.
You mean psychoanalysis of pictures with that right? Because that's what I'm seeing here.
WTF? What pictures?
every fucking band picture here is quoted in every post for at least 2 pages because everybody can tell from Stone's face he's dissatisfied with the band. 80% of his interviews and quotes get filtered out anyway because that would kind of get in the way of the image people have of him.
I have not seen any of the pictures you're referring to. I have not captioned any pictures. I don't care about pictures. If you remember, I've been putting forward actual arguments.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:
I have not seen any of the pictures you're referring to. I have not captioned any pictures. I don't care about pictures. If you remember, I've been putting forward actual arguments.
I wasn't referring to you or this thread with that. Having said that the main argument people have for "knowing" Stone is dissatisfied with the band is because he looks funny in every publicity shot the band does it isn't his quotes or interviews. And no i will not go search a certain thread of legendary proportions just because i remember people dragging a recent publicity shot and :lol: at it because...well you get the picture.

Anyway i think a lot of things get blown out of proportion regarding the band weather we're talking about artistic or business choices.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by EJ »

Well, yeah.

Jeff leaving stage a little early to take a massive dump in Baltimore = he's quitting the band.
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by zeb »

Birds in Hell wrote:Ringo was a brilliant drummer for the Beatles.
User avatar
LuNY
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri August 02, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by LuNY »

"send" Matt back to SG??? HAA. Matt Cameron is an amazing drummer. One of the most respected drummers in the world. By the way he is in both bands, and always will be. The other members of PJ love the fact that Matt has been with them since 98, he is a genius. Dave A??? wow, let it go, thats never going to happen, maybe at the rock in roll hall of fame induction in 8 years or whatever. :wave:
User avatar
Fuzzcharger
Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Fuzzcharger »

zeb wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:Ringo was a brilliant drummer for the Beatles.
I'd take Ringo over Dave A everyday of the week.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
hankholetsgo
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue September 10, 2013 3:31 pm
Location: Washington, DC.

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by hankholetsgo »

Fuzzcharger wrote:
zeb wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:Ringo was a brilliant drummer for the Beatles.
I'd take Ringo over Dave A everyday of the week.
I'll go along with this.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Lament »

EJ wrote:Jeff leaving stage a little early to take a massive dump in Baltimore
Do we know it was massive, or is this just another case of classic RM speculation?
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Jorge »

psychoanalysis of dookie
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by EJ »

Lament wrote:
EJ wrote:Jeff leaving stage a little early to take a massive dump in Baltimore
Do we know it was massive, or is this just another case of classic RM speculation?
I need to look at more Stone pics to know for sure.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?

Post by Lament »

Maybe it was massive for Jeff, but for Mike it was a mere fart. Should we judge Jeff's bowel movements against the size and quality of his previous bowel movements, against those of his peers and contemporaries, or against the greatest of all-time?

So much to think about...
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
Post Reply