Pearl Jam Videos

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by McParadigm »

I'd assume that, since longer tours unfold over such a lengthy period of time and since most people only experience shorter ones in retrospect (as materials become available online or whatever), it just takes a long time for an era's "personality" to get properly sussed.

But I'm not really a part of the crowd on this one, so I don't know.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by evenslow »

stip wrote:
EJ wrote:getting old sucks
it does. I wonder how much of what people see as 'boredom' is conserving strength for marathon shows. They are averaging about 5+ songs more from 2005, and that was 8 years ago to boot.
yeah this is true.

it's easy to forget he's 50 b/c i mean come on :luv:
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by MattA75 »

stip wrote:
evenslow wrote:
EJ wrote:
evenslow wrote:
EJ wrote:that 2005 tour was pretty special.
when did this become RM conventional wisdom? don't think i've noticed as much talk of this tour until recently.
Really? It was regarded really highly as it was unfolding that year. Maybe it gets overlooked because of the massive 2006 tour?
Unless I'm high, but since that time I haven't heard a ton about it. That's probably b/c people round these parts love to generalize that they've been shit since Riot Act. 2005 is inconvenient for that argument.

Until now, for some reason. It's all part of the ever-expanding "they haven't been really good since..." thing that will ten years from now include the 2013 LB tour.
it gets skipped over in the pearl jam has sucked since Binaural and/or Riot Act rant, but when people are actually having serious conversations about the live shows 2005 and 2006 are both spoken of pretty highly.
I think the Binaural/Riot Act rant has to do with their creative output, not their live performances
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by hlniv »

MattA75 wrote:
stip wrote:
evenslow wrote:
EJ wrote:
evenslow wrote:
EJ wrote:that 2005 tour was pretty special.
when did this become RM conventional wisdom? don't think i've noticed as much talk of this tour until recently.
Really? It was regarded really highly as it was unfolding that year. Maybe it gets overlooked because of the massive 2006 tour?
Unless I'm high, but since that time I haven't heard a ton about it. That's probably b/c people round these parts love to generalize that they've been shit since Riot Act. 2005 is inconvenient for that argument.

Until now, for some reason. It's all part of the ever-expanding "they haven't been really good since..." thing that will ten years from now include the 2013 LB tour.
it gets skipped over in the pearl jam has sucked since Binaural and/or Riot Act rant, but when people are actually having serious conversations about the live shows 2005 and 2006 are both spoken of pretty highly.
I think the Binaural/Riot Act rant has to do with their creative output, not their live performances
:thumbsup:
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
EJ wrote:getting old sucks
it does. I wonder how much of what people see as 'boredom' is conserving strength for marathon shows. They are averaging about 5+ songs more from 2005, and that was 8 years ago to boot.
This is possible and I've been thinking of it a bit more lately. I'm often going on about how comparatively simplistic and crude Matt's playing has been in recent years, compared to earlier years when he killed it, both live and on record. I watched that vid from 2005 put up here yesterday, and I was reminded that a lot of the recent simplification of his playing must be deliberate, because he's not getting any younger, and the difference is so noticeable. On that basis I can give him a break about it, I guess. Begrudgingly.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by hlniv »

Matt Cameron peaked early in PJ. Certainly.







Although, I could argue that In the Moonlight was his pinnacle with the band. At least in terms of contribution to the band,
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by Strat »

Lets stop ragging on MC and start figuring out why the Fuck ed does not use the Shecter anymore. I hate his guitar setup now and he's been using it for 8 years. Worst.
User avatar
lvc
Huge WNBA Fan
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon March 04, 2013 3:22 pm
Location: Lost in an unbalanced ledger

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by lvc »

I wonder if Ed has taken a more subdued/clean guitar tone to make space for Stone. His setup during the 2000 tour made it hard for Stone's stuff to break the surface, at least to my ears.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by harmless »

I think he just has a cleaner guitar tone now because he's a wuss. I'm not sure Stone is any more prominent because of it, certainly not on S/T or BS.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Lounge Lizard
AnalLog
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by Lounge Lizard »

harmless wrote:I think he just has a cleaner guitar tone now because he's a wuss. I'm not sure Stone is any more prominent because of it, certainly not on S/T or BS.
and he keeps the beard to hide the weak chin
Image Image
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by harmless »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
harmless wrote:I think he just has a cleaner guitar tone now because he's a wuss. I'm not sure Stone is any more prominent because of it, certainly not on S/T or BS.
and he keeps the beard to hide the weak chin
:thumbsup:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by hlniv »

Strat wrote:Lets stop ragging on MC and start figuring out why the Fuck ed does not use the Shecter anymore. I hate his guitar setup now and he's been using it for 8 years. Worst.
So do we all agree that Mike, Jeff & Stone still meet our performance and equipment expectations? What about Boom?

I want be clear on this, so we can focus on exactly who and what to rag on.
hbk
A Return To Form
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by hbk »

Strat wrote:Lets stop ragging on MC and start figuring out why the Fuck ed does not use the Shecter anymore. I hate his guitar setup now and he's been using it for 8 years. Worst.

That Schecter is awesome. I noticed they still make a similar black tele model and saw it at Guitar Center one day. That guitar is HEAVY...I already have back issues from playing Les Pauls the last 13 years, and that guitar felt heavier than a traditional Les Paul.

I initially liked Ed's SG phase during 2003, but that's also when he pulled the gain back on his Hi-Watt amp, and was disappointed that he wasn't making the guitar crunch as much as he had before.

Corduroy live is never the same for me since he changed his sound. I was so accustomed to hearing the intro done with that Schecter/Hi-Watt combination.
taffer
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun April 07, 2013 7:28 am

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by taffer »

Not sure if these have been posted but great vids anyway. Ed's effing hilarious by the drums :lol:

ed w liam finn

[YouTube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiAU9mTaZ6Q&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/YouTube]

[YouTube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uyf5iIThX_M&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/YouTube]


sh*t can't put the links properly :|
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by evenslow »

FTFY



Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
BootsToAsses
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue February 05, 2013 9:53 am

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by BootsToAsses »

The black guitar Ed used in 2000 was my favourite by far. I love how that sounded. I think the guitar he's been using the last few years is terrible because he's quite an aggressive/sloppy guitar player and I think on the bootlegs they always turn Ed up more and it drowns out Stone. It's noticeable at times when all three guitars are being played together, on a song like Unthought Known when it all kicks in before the "Nothing left..." bit. Fucking hate how it sounds most of the time.

Bring back the Binaural era guitar please.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by Strat »

His tele/fender setup is far too jangly. Its completely out of place. The shecter/Hi-watt combo was smooth as butter and somewhat aggressive. Wonderful.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by Birds in Hell »

Agreed.

Telecasters can sound plenty warm and full-bodied through the right set-up (like, say, mine) but Vedder's Tele invariably sounds really thin and weak.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by hlniv »


User avatar
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10399
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Pearl Jam Videos

Post by Stickman »

rough night last evening
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
Post Reply