Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

numbers wrote:Doubront needs to prove he can show up for a season without turning into a tub of lard during the offseason before I'm willing to put a high value on him.
what he did in the world series was filthy. i'll stay on team doubront, thanks.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

*still assuming* the Sox are working w/ $32M this offseason (based on current obligations for '14 and the reports that they won't be going over $189M to avoid the luxury tax) and therefore that none of their own free agents return, how would you feel about this 25-man roster? (bolded = FA or trade)

SP: Lester (l), Lackey (r), Buchholz (r), Doubront (l), Peavy (r)
BP: Uehara (r), Breslow (l), Tazawa (r)(arb), Mujica (r), Badenhop (r)(arb), Miller (l)(arb), Dempster (r, long)

line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
LF: Gomes (r)
1B: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)

Bench: Carp (l) (arb), Ross (r), insert OF here, insert utility IF here

Total for the fa & arb. elligibles comes to $21.50M, which leaves the Sox with $10.50M to get to their below-luxury-tax total, with bench players being the only roster spots not currently filled. Also, the recent Mujica signing likely means Workman keeps his pawtucket-bus-pass (spot starter).
Spoiler: show
Pierzynski - $8.25M, love the one you're with
Mujica - $4.75, no free passes makes him seem like a uehara "stat" comparable.

estimated (made-up by me giving them a raise on their salary from this year) arbitration numbers:
Tazawa - $3M
Miller - $2.5M
Badenhop - $2M
Carp - $1M
Last edited by elliseamos on Thu December 05, 2013 10:16 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Coach »

elliseamos wrote:*still assuming* the Sox are working w/ $32M this offseason (based on current obligations for '14 and the reports that they won't be going over $189M to avoid the luxury tax) and therefore that none of their own free agents return, how would you feel about this 25-man roster? (bolded = FA or trade)

SP: Lester, Lackey, Buchholz, Peavy, Doubront
BP: Uehara, Breslow, Tazawa (arb), Badenhop (arb), Workman, Miller (arb), Dempster

line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
LF: Gomes (r)
1B: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)

Bench: Carp (l) (arb), Ross (r), insert OF here, insert utility IF here

Total for the fa & arb. elligibles comes to $16.5M, which leaves the Sox with $15.5M to get to their below-luxury-tax total, with bench players being the only roster spots not currently filled.
Spoiler: show
Pierzynski - $8M, love the one you're with

estimated (made-up by me giving them a raise on their salary from this year) arbitration numbers:
Tazawa - $3M
Miller - $2.5M
Badenhop - $2M
Carp - $1M
Love the starting five pitchers, and that's most important.

Don't think you can have Dempster work the bull pen...think he's gone via trade

Not loving the batting order...need more pop. Makes me really recognize Napoli's presence....

Good job on this, Ellis
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Coach wrote:
elliseamos wrote:*still assuming* the Sox are working w/ $32M this offseason (based on current obligations for '14 and the reports that they won't be going over $189M to avoid the luxury tax) and therefore that none of their own free agents return, how would you feel about this 25-man roster? (bolded = FA or trade)

SP: Lester, Lackey, Buchholz, Peavy, Doubront
BP: Uehara, Breslow, Tazawa (arb), Badenhop (arb), Workman, Miller (arb), Dempster

line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
LF: Gomes (r)
1B: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)

Bench: Carp (l) (arb), Ross (r), insert OF here, insert utility IF here

Total for the fa & arb. elligibles comes to $16.5M, which leaves the Sox with $15.5M to get to their below-luxury-tax total, with bench players being the only roster spots not currently filled.
Spoiler: show
Pierzynski - $8M, love the one you're with

estimated (made-up by me giving them a raise on their salary from this year) arbitration numbers:
Tazawa - $3M
Miller - $2.5M
Badenhop - $2M
Carp - $1M
Love the starting five pitchers, and that's most important.

Don't think you can have Dempster work the bull pen...think he's gone via trade

Not loving the batting order...need more pop. Makes me really recognize Napoli's presence....

Good job on this, Ellis
dempster's listing had more to do with who was staying in the rotation.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

elliseamos wrote:
Coach wrote:
elliseamos wrote:*still assuming* the Sox are working w/ $32M this offseason (based on current obligations for '14 and the reports that they won't be going over $189M to avoid the luxury tax) and therefore that none of their own free agents return, how would you feel about this 25-man roster? (bolded = FA or trade)

SP: Lester, Lackey, Buchholz, Peavy, Doubront
BP: Uehara, Breslow, Tazawa (arb), Badenhop (arb), Workman, Miller (arb), Dempster

line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
LF: Gomes (r)
1B: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)

Bench: Carp (l) (arb), Ross (r), insert OF here, insert utility IF here

Total for the fa & arb. elligibles comes to $16.5M, which leaves the Sox with $15.5M to get to their below-luxury-tax total, with bench players being the only roster spots not currently filled.
Spoiler: show
Pierzynski - $8M, love the one you're with

estimated (made-up by me giving them a raise on their salary from this year) arbitration numbers:
Tazawa - $3M
Miller - $2.5M
Badenhop - $2M
Carp - $1M
Love the starting five pitchers, and that's most important.

Don't think you can have Dempster work the bull pen...think he's gone via trade

Not loving the batting order...need more pop. Makes me really recognize Napoli's presence....

Good job on this, Ellis
dempster's listing had more to do with who was staying in the rotation.
Dempster will get plenty of starts once Buchholz finds some sand in his vag

we really need to re-sign Napoli
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

Saltalamacchia ends up getting an average of $7 million over the next three years. Wouldn't that deal have been preferable to what they're paying Pierzynski for 2014? Or are Swihart and Vazquez good enough/close enough that they don't want to block them beyond this year?
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

philpritchard wrote:Saltalamacchia ends up getting an average of $7 million over the next three years. Wouldn't that deal have been preferable to what they're paying Pierzynski for 2014? Or are Swihart and Vazquez good enough/close enough that they don't want to block them beyond this year?
I honestly think they were just done with Saltalamacchia after the postseason he had and how effective the pitchers were with Ross catching...I'm sure the prospects were part of the decision too, but I'm not sure the team will be missing much with Salty gone
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Saltalamacchia ends up getting an average of $7 million over the next three years. Wouldn't that deal have been preferable to what they're paying Pierzynski for 2014? Or are Swihart and Vazquez good enough/close enough that they don't want to block them beyond this year?
I honestly think they were just done with Saltalamacchia after the postseason he had and how effective the pitchers were with Ross catching...I'm sure the prospects were part of the decision too, but I'm not sure the team will be missing much with Salty gone
I guess going from Saltalamacchia to Pierzynski will save money on jersey production, too. They should have just stuck with Ross as the starter.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:Saltalamacchia ends up getting an average of $7 million over the next three years. Wouldn't that deal have been preferable to what they're paying Pierzynski for 2014? Or are Swihart and Vazquez good enough/close enough that they don't want to block them beyond this year?
I honestly think they were just done with Saltalamacchia after the postseason he had and how effective the pitchers were with Ross catching...I'm sure the prospects were part of the decision too, but I'm not sure the team will be missing much with Salty gone
I guess going from Saltalamacchia to Pierzynski will save money on jersey production, too. They should have just stuck with Ross as the starter.
I think it'll be a 100-60 split or so between the two, and Ross was hurt this year for a good period of time...I think this says more about what they think of Lavarnway's potential as an everyday bat more than anything...
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Salty couldn't handle crunch time, this year wasn't the first time he shit his pants once the games started mattering. Why resign him when you don't trust him to play in big games? Not to mention that the pitchers all wanted the other catcher every year regardless of who it was.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:Salty couldn't handle crunch time, this year wasn't the first time he shit his pants once the games started mattering. Why resign him when you don't trust him to play in big games? Not to mention that the pitchers all wanted the other catcher every year regardless of who it was.
If it's based on his game calling skills or his defensive ability or his chances of repeating a breakout season, that's perfectly fair. If they let him go because of a 20 at-bat sample in which he struggled during the playoffs, that's a horrible decision.
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1503
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:Salty couldn't handle crunch time, this year wasn't the first time he shit his pants once the games started mattering. Why resign him when you don't trust him to play in big games? Not to mention that the pitchers all wanted the other catcher every year regardless of who it was.
If it's based on his game calling skills or his defensive ability or his chances of repeating a breakout season, that's perfectly fair. If they let him go because of a 20 at-bat sample in which he struggled during the playoffs, that's a horrible decision.
it was his defense that killed him in the playoffs, not his lack of offense
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
numbers wrote:Salty couldn't handle crunch time, this year wasn't the first time he shit his pants once the games started mattering. Why resign him when you don't trust him to play in big games? Not to mention that the pitchers all wanted the other catcher every year regardless of who it was.
If it's based on his game calling skills or his defensive ability or his chances of repeating a breakout season, that's perfectly fair. If they let him go because of a 20 at-bat sample in which he struggled during the playoffs, that's a horrible decision.
it was his defense that killed him in the playoffs, not his lack of offense
Ahhh ok. Still, though, the playoffs are such a small sample that you have to take anything that happens there with a grain of... salt (ha!). Is his defense normally that bad?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

He's not a good game caller. This years playoffs wasn't the first time his nerves got the better of him. The last week of the year in 2011 they benched him in favor of lavarnway(who hadn't caught a game in the majors) because he couldn't throw to a base without air mailing it.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

i've added mujica to my run-through of the roster up-thread.

i like the signing. it reminds me of uehara's signing last season (no, i don't expect mujica to be the new closer).
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I predict that Uehara will not be the closer by the all star break, so I'm all for adding guys with closer stuff and experience in the role.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

I'll never not like a signing like this. A relief pitcher with experience and past success (despite hiccups along the way) for around 10MM over 2 years. Bullpens are never safe, no matter how well they perform one year you always need to add a guy like this.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

If they could get Kemp for say, Webster and Marerro(or something similar) with the Dodgers eating some of the money, would you do it?
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by elliseamos »

Nap is back!

I'd say that's it for roster moves, unless they can trade one of their $tarter$
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

I love that we're pretty much at the luxury tax threshold and still haven't re-signed Drew.
Post Reply