Pearl Jam today vs. the past

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by Heathen »

southp wrote:Have a listen to songs like Pendulum, MFS, Infallible, Yellow Moon... these songs stack up well to just about anything from the middle albums.
I've already done that and it turns out they don't.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by southp »

Heathen wrote:
southp wrote:Have a listen to songs like Pendulum, MFS, Infallible, Yellow Moon... these songs stack up well to just about anything from the middle albums.
I've already done that and it turns out they don't.
Then you can throw out your copy of LB or delete the files and just listen to Wishlist and Cropduster on repeat then. You're all set.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by harmless »

Heathen wrote:
southp wrote:Have a listen to songs like Pendulum, MFS, Infallible, Yellow Moon... these songs stack up well to just about anything from the middle albums.
I've already done that and it turns out they don't.
Some of them could have, if they hadn't made such awful production / instrumental decisions. But the fact that you've named under half the album, southp, is kind of the problem anyway.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by southp »

harmless wrote:
Heathen wrote:
southp wrote:Have a listen to songs like Pendulum, MFS, Infallible, Yellow Moon... these songs stack up well to just about anything from the middle albums.
I've already done that and it turns out they don't.
Some of them could have, if they hadn't made such awful production / instrumental decisions. But the fact that you've named under half the album, southp, is kind of the problem anyway.
I'm happy with 90% of LB, I was trying to speak to the common tone of RM.
I think I already went through this sentiment of "PJ let down" multiple times along the journey since Ten. When Vitalogy came out I was saying they sold out on Betterman and Nothingman and wasting tracks with Aye Davanita and Stupidmop. When No Code came out I was saying that Ed has lost his voice, and the album had lost a certain aggression that was present in the first three...Stone singing a song? No thanks! And what's with Around the Bend? A fuckin' lullabye?

With time I've appreciate these changes and directions, and it's left me open to how the band is evolving now (or de-volving in some people's eyes).

Listening to Yellow Moon right now, spinning on my turntable, through my McIntosh amp/preamp on the big speakers and I can tell you it's a thing of fuckin' beauty and stands strong against something like All or None or Parting Ways or ... ok, not quite in Long Road territory. ;)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

:thumbsup:

I went through the exact same thing with No Code.
User avatar
LikeLukin
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue June 25, 2013 5:59 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Contact:

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by LikeLukin »

To me, the problem is that the intrinsic motivation to make great, thoughtful, artistic albums was so strong for PJ in the past, but is clearly non-existent now. I think that is ultimately why many of us love the old albums up until Riot Act, but aren't fond of the post- Riot Act albums.

*Edit: wrong thread. They all combine in one big wash for me sometimes, and I'm bad with this touch screen smart phone thing.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

LikeLukin wrote:To me, the problem is that the intrinsic motivation to make great, thoughtful, artistic albums was so strong for PJ in the past, but is clearly non-existent now. I think that is ultimately why many of us love the old albums up until Riot Act, but aren't fond of the post- Riot Act albums.

*Edit: wrong thread. They all combine in one big wash for me sometimes, and I'm bad with this touch screen smart phone thing.

yes. CLEARLY it is.'

(I hate posting on my ipad, too)
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by hlniv »

stip wrote: according to McP's sales analysis the record sales, controlling for the general drop off, show that Backspacer sold as well as Yield, and that L-bolt is on pace to do something similar.
Exactly. No new fans. Except to maybe a very small extent.

How many people do you know who own Yield but not the last two records?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

Probably the exact same number of people who own yield but do not own Riot Act and S/T.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

And I think more people own S/T and Backspacer than Riot Act.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

also, I forgot what I was arguing in this thread.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

stip wrote:And I think more people own S/T and Backspacer than Riot Act.
I own two copies of Riot Act and only one of the other two.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by hlniv »

You all have exactly supported my point. Thank you.

My point was that basically the same people that bought yield continued to buy all subsequent records. Saying an album sold as well as Yield does not mean the band is attracting new listeners. Generally, if you are buying a new pearl jam record today, you probably already bought yield and the prior albums.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote::thumbsup:

I went through the exact same thing with No Code.
Went, or are still going?
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by Leatherhead »

LikeLukin wrote:To me, the problem is that the intrinsic motivation to make great, thoughtful, artistic albums was so strong for PJ in the past, but is clearly non-existent now. I think that is ultimately why many of us love the old albums up until Riot Act, but aren't fond of the post- Riot Act albums.

*Edit: wrong thread. They all combine in one big wash for me sometimes, and I'm bad with this touch screen smart phone thing.
I don't think "motivation to make great, thoughtful, artistic albums" can possibly be an intrinsic property.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by stip »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote::thumbsup:

I went through the exact same thing with No Code.
Went, or are still going?

Went. Now they are just the songs, for better or worse. Although I don't doubt my initial difficulties with the album have colored how I hear it at least in part.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by evenslow »

stip wrote:I wish evenslow was here
:wave:

yeoman's work is too often a lonely enterprise.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by Leatherhead »

I was just scrolling through these posts and saw mention of Death Magnetic. Awesome album, could definitely see somebody going from that to earlier stuff like Master of Puppets and ...And Justice For All.

Also, when I was at the concert in Portland, after the concert, while using the restroom, I asked a young kid what his favorite PJ album is (while we were both washing our hands). His answer was Lightning Bolt. I asked him about my favorite, Binaural, and he didn't know what album I was talking about, said he'd have to hear some songs from it to know wtf I was talking about. However, this was only one incident, one person, at one concert, in one city, etc.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by liebzz »

Maybe I get crap for this, but I'm gonna say it anyway: I really don't care if Pearl Jam is attracting new listeners. I care that they are attracting me as a listener. And to my ears, Lightning Bolt is on par, in terms of quality, with Yield. That might seem blasphemous to those who place the first five on a separate pedestal that no new Pearl Jam album could have a chance at achieving, but I do think, months and months after first hearing it and digesting it over and over, that this is dare I say it, a great album.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Pearl Jam today vs. the past

Post by evenslow »

Leatherhead wrote:(while we were both washing our hands).
Thank God for the clarifying parenthetical.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
Post Reply