The Chicago Bears
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
Another week, another sick Jeffery TD.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: The Chicago Bears
This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15498
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: The Chicago Bears
You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: The Chicago Bears
I'm sure someone's going to point out how wrong I am, because I really don't know what I'm talking about, but I think we should franchise Cutler to buy another year, resign McCown to a decent 1 or 2 year deal, and draft nothing but defensive guys.
Unless we make the playoffs, he D gets hot, and we go deep. If Cutler pulls an Eli it's a different story.
Unless we make the playoffs, he D gets hot, and we go deep. If Cutler pulls an Eli it's a different story.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
Financially it's a bad move to franchise the QB this season (typically its bad to franchise a QB). Cutler would get somewhere between $16-18M, but the salary cap implications would be what really matters and would hamper their ability to resign players or get new FAs. When a player signs a multiyear deal, their salary cap hit can be spread out over the contract, whereas the Franchise tag would be very large for a single year.Kaius wrote:I'm sure someone's going to point out how wrong I am, because I really don't know what I'm talking about, but I think we should franchise Cutler to buy another year, resign McCown to a decent 1 or 2 year deal, and draft nothing but defensive guys.
Unless we make the playoffs, he D gets hot, and we go deep. If Cutler pulls an Eli it's a different story.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
IF you admit he can get a raise, why did you say the bears can't give more than the minimum?pnjguy wrote:He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
The Bears can negotiate with McCown, they just can't sign him until FA begins.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
The reports have been choppy. More info today on it.Fuck You Jobu wrote:IF you admit he can get a raise, why did you say the bears can't give more than the minimum?pnjguy wrote:He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
The Bears can negotiate with McCown, they just can't sign him until FA begins.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
Honestly I think McCown will stay, accept a decent raise to stay in a good situation with Trestman, his offensive system and Offensive firepower of the Bears. He prob won't get close to that in another situation. Unless another team offers him an enormous contract, but I'm sure that previous list will be factored into other GM's thought processes.pnjguy wrote:The reports have been choppy. More info today on it.Fuck You Jobu wrote:IF you admit he can get a raise, why did you say the bears can't give more than the minimum?pnjguy wrote:He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
The Bears can negotiate with McCown, they just can't sign him until FA begins.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
Same situation with Cutler. With all that he's been saying, sounds like Cutler will stay for less to be in this good situation.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Honestly I think McCown will stay, accept a decent raise to stay in a good situation with Trestman, his offensive system and Offensive firepower of the Bears. He prob won't get close to that in another situation. Unless another team offers him an enormous contract, but I'm sure that previous list will be factored into other GM's thought processes.pnjguy wrote:The reports have been choppy. More info today on it.Fuck You Jobu wrote:IF you admit he can get a raise, why did you say the bears can't give more than the minimum?pnjguy wrote:He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
The Bears can negotiate with McCown, they just can't sign him until FA begins.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
Yeah I think so. I think he wants the SB and probably doesn't want to change OCs again - nor leave the talent in Chicago (where he is the undisputed starter).pnjguy wrote:Same situation with Cutler. With all that he's been saying, sounds like Cutler will stay for less to be in this good situation.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Honestly I think McCown will stay, accept a decent raise to stay in a good situation with Trestman, his offensive system and Offensive firepower of the Bears. He prob won't get close to that in another situation. Unless another team offers him an enormous contract, but I'm sure that previous list will be factored into other GM's thought processes.pnjguy wrote:The reports have been choppy. More info today on it.Fuck You Jobu wrote:IF you admit he can get a raise, why did you say the bears can't give more than the minimum?pnjguy wrote:He can, but they can't do it before free agency opens where he'll likely be given more years and money by other teams.Fuck You Jobu wrote:Why can't McCown get a raise from the Bears?pnjguy wrote:I think they played him because they have no idea if he's the answer as much as they want him to be.Chris_H_2 wrote:You think they played Cutler this past weekend to find out how much they need to pay him next year? Really?pnjguy wrote:Regardless of the outcome, I think you have to find out if and how much you're going to pay Cutler at the end of the year. You don't find that out if he's on the bench.Chris_H_2 wrote:This would have been good if not for the timing of the date/time stamp.pnjguy wrote:Really, no reason at all?Chris_H_2 wrote:I can't think of any conceivable reason to start Cutler when he gets back. I can't believe this is even a consideration.
Also, the Bears can't give McCown more than the minimum next year so he's as good as gone.
The Bears can negotiate with McCown, they just can't sign him until FA begins.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35444
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Chicago Bears
it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.
- pnjguy
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
There's a lot to be excited about. We have a big boy offense that makes me touch myself in odd places.spike wrote:it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35444
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Chicago Bears
i just wanna pinch your little cheeks!pnjguy wrote:There's a lot to be excited about. We have a big boy offense that makes me touch myself in odd places.spike wrote:it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.
Last edited by spike on Wed December 18, 2013 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: The Chicago Bears
pnjguy wrote:There's a lot to be excited about. We have a big boy offense that makes me touch myself in odd places.spike wrote:it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.
As long as they make the playoffs, its all good.
No one's beating Seattle in their house.
- Fuck You Jobu
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 10:46 pm
- Location: Wrigleyville
Re: The Chicago Bears
spike wrote:it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35444
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: The Chicago Bears
Fuck You Jobu wrote:spike wrote:it's always adorable watching bears fans talk all optimistic and stuff.Where is the optimism that makes you feel so fuzzy inside?