Boston Red Sox Thread
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'd still like a veteran OF as insurance for Bradley
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'd have signed Beltran for 3/45 in a heartbeat.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Loved Nap's Tweet...elliseamos wrote:Nap is back!
I'd say that's it for roster moves, unless they can trade one of their $tarter$
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
As I've been tracking, if the Sox were looking to be at or below $189M for next year's payroll, they're at $175M spent at this point. I have to believe they're done with the big moves to allow themselves the option of taking on money during the season. I'd also think that the team will be dumping or re-negotiating with one of: Lackey, Peavy, or Dempster, to further open the door to trades at the deadline.
SP: Lester (l), Lackey (r), Buchholz (r), Doubront (l), Peavy (r)
BP: Uehara (r), Breslow (l), Tazawa (r)(arb), Mujica (r), Badenhop (r)(arb), Miller (l)(arb), Dempster (r, long)
line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
1B: Napoli (r)
LF: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)
Bench: Carp (l)(arb), Ross (r), Gomes (r), Herrera (s)(arb)
Total Spent this offseason: $37.5M
SP: Lester (l), Lackey (r), Buchholz (r), Doubront (l), Peavy (r)
BP: Uehara (r), Breslow (l), Tazawa (r)(arb), Mujica (r), Badenhop (r)(arb), Miller (l)(arb), Dempster (r, long)
line-up/order:
RF: Victorino (s)
2B: Pedroia (r)
DH: Ortiz (l)
1B: Napoli (r)
LF: Nava (s)
C: Pierzynski (l)
3B: Middlebrooks (r)
CF: Jackie Bradley Jr. (l)
SS: Bogaerts (r)
Bench: Carp (l)(arb), Ross (r), Gomes (r), Herrera (s)(arb)
Total Spent this offseason: $37.5M
- Spoiler: show
Last edited by elliseamos on Thu December 19, 2013 11:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Me and Cherington, we think alike.numbers wrote:Id like to see them sign Napoli to something like 2/30, with an option for a 3rd, and then let the other 3 walk. You plug Bogaerts in for Drew. You replace Salty with either someone like Hanigan, or maybe you sign Pierzynski if he's not looking for anything more than a year.
edit: I really hope he follows my advice on Drew as well.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'd still like to see them bring Drew back; just not comfortable with Middlebrooks at third and Bogaerts at SS as starters heading into the season.numbers wrote:Me and Cherington, we think alike.numbers wrote:Id like to see them sign Napoli to something like 2/30, with an option for a 3rd, and then let the other 3 walk. You plug Bogaerts in for Drew. You replace Salty with either someone like Hanigan, or maybe you sign Pierzynski if he's not looking for anything more than a year.
edit: I really hope he follows my advice on Drew as well.
I'd start Drew at SS and then have Bogaerts play third to begin the season unless Middlebrooks finds his swing again in Spring Training.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'd rather go with Middlebrooks and Bogaerts and have the payroll flexibility to do something bigger if they need to come July than deal with an overpaid Stephen Drew for multiple yearsCoach wrote:I'd still like to see them bring Drew back; just not comfortable with Middlebrooks at third and Bogaerts at SS as starters heading into the season.numbers wrote:Me and Cherington, we think alike.numbers wrote:Id like to see them sign Napoli to something like 2/30, with an option for a 3rd, and then let the other 3 walk. You plug Bogaerts in for Drew. You replace Salty with either someone like Hanigan, or maybe you sign Pierzynski if he's not looking for anything more than a year.
edit: I really hope he follows my advice on Drew as well.
I'd start Drew at SS and then have Bogaerts play third to begin the season unless Middlebrooks finds his swing again in Spring Training.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I want Bogaerts to play SS next year. How many years has this team been looking for a great young shortstop? They finally have one, and they want to move him to 3B? I'm not ready to give up on Middlebrooks yet either, he still has great upside.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
here's hoping the trade today officially means Stephen Drew is gone
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
i'd have to believe that's the case.MattA75 wrote:here's hoping the trade today officially means Stephen Drew is gone
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I don't know much about the guy they got, is he a major league player or more of a Brock holt type? If it's the latter I don't think it changes anything with drew.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Hey Sox fans! Oldman ellis added Peavy's contract twice in the excel sheet and therefore, the Sox have something like $14M to work with before they exceed the $189M luxury tax threshold.

- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
ellis working through the roster on a spreadsheet, while readily available in about 900.000 places on the internet and in print media, is hilarious.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
i knew of no other place than cots for "2014 obligations" and then went through mlbtraderumors for arb. estimates. i don't know of these other 898,000 places for said info, but i'm happy to know of them.@SkitchP wrote:ellis working through the roster on a spreadsheet, while readily available in about 900.000 places on the internet and in print media, is hilarious.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
elliseamos wrote:i knew of no other place than cots for "2014 obligations" and then went through mlbtraderumors for arb. estimates. i don't know of these other 898,000 places for said info, but i'm happy to know of them.@SkitchP wrote:ellis working through the roster on a spreadsheet, while readily available in about 900.000 places on the internet and in print media, is hilarious.
It's just cute. All im sayin
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
did yours take into account the raises that guys that are arbitration eligible will get?elliseamos wrote:Hey Sox fans! Oldman ellis added Peavy's contract twice in the excel sheet and therefore, the Sox have something like $14M to work with before they exceed the $189M luxury tax threshold.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
yes i did, numbers.numbers wrote:did yours take into account the raises that guys that are arbitration eligible will get?elliseamos wrote:Hey Sox fans! Oldman ellis added Peavy's contract twice in the excel sheet and therefore, the Sox have something like $14M to work with before they exceed the $189M luxury tax threshold.
also, clearly this dough is burning a hole in their pocket:
The Red Sox want Stephen Drew back and hope to still re-sign him, manager John Farrell said during a radio appearance on WEEI's Hot Stove Show (partial transcript from WEEI.com's Alex Speier). Boston's recent trade for Jonathan Herrera adds needed experience to their young left side of the infield, but Farrell said that there's mutual interest between Drew and the Sox in a reunion.
-
shinkdew
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 2:59 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I think it's safe to say that Drew has no other options other than the Red Sox, if he did, he would've already signed somewhere else. He's going to end up signing for less than the $14m qualifying offer. Boras screwed him just like he did Varitek in 2008.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
Yeah, not as bad as he fucked up Choo though(thus far, at least.) I dont have an issue with Drew, he's a solid player, I just want Bogaerts playing short next year.