Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Matter?

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by EJ »

Image

Matt

He's a zombie so he's on borrowed time anyway.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36492
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Jorge »

harmless wrote:I'm bored of just having my ears superficially tickled by this band, I want them to peg me.
sigh

*unzips*
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Norah »

Birds in Hell wrote:
Lament wrote:I'd love to hear a record made by Stone, Jeff, and Matt.
A thousand times this.
Yep, just let Stone sing.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Kaius »

Better yet, have Stone, Jeff, and Matt write the music and bring in Ed to sing for them. That'd be great.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Norah »

fuck that, let stone sing
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Kaius »

Ok you win
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Kaius »

Kaius wrote:Better yet, have Stone, Jeff, and Matt write the music and bring in Ed to sing for them. That'd be great.
*experimental
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9429
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Rangi Guy »

Image
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by harmless »

theplatypus wrote:
harmless wrote:I'm bored of just having my ears superficially tickled by this band, I want them to peg me.
sigh

*unzips*
:luv:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
lejarmap138
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 7:58 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by lejarmap138 »

harmless wrote: I absolutely agree. I don't think Lightning Bolt is life-endingly bad, I really don't. But I just want some engagement and genuinely interesting ideas. I'm bored of just having my ears superficially tickled by this band, I want them to peg me.
You have a way with words.

I like Lightning Bolt more than Backspacer, and think a lot of what Jeff wrote is very interesting.
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4280
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Leatherhead »

EJ wrote:Image

Matt

He's a zombie so he's on borrowed time anyway.
This is funny.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by harmless »

lejarmap138 wrote:
harmless wrote: I absolutely agree. I don't think Lightning Bolt is life-endingly bad, I really don't. But I just want some engagement and genuinely interesting ideas. I'm bored of just having my ears superficially tickled by this band, I want them to peg me.
You have a way with words.

I like Lightning Bolt more than Backspacer, and think a lot of what Jeff wrote is very interesting.
I do too, but I could like it much more, and that frustrates me.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
LuNY
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri August 02, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by LuNY »

Wishlist wrote:Drummers come and go in this band so losing Matt wouldn't change a thing (might even make them better).

But of Eddie, Stone, Mike, and Jeff which guy if they left would matter least?

Gotta go with Mike. Lead player? I can't stand lead guitar. Leave that stuff to hair metal bands. Sure Mike has written a few top songs for the band, but bottom line if he weren't on the left side of the stage, the band would still be Pearl Jam.

Matt is so important to Pearl Jam, you do not have a clue! Do you play an instrument? If you don't like Matt you don't understand music. :wave:
Oh, Jimmy
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:57 am

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Oh, Jimmy »

LuNY wrote:
Wishlist wrote:Drummers come and go in this band so losing Matt wouldn't change a thing (might even make them better).

But of Eddie, Stone, Mike, and Jeff which guy if they left would matter least?

Gotta go with Mike. Lead player? I can't stand lead guitar. Leave that stuff to hair metal bands. Sure Mike has written a few top songs for the band, but bottom line if he weren't on the left side of the stage, the band would still be Pearl Jam.

Matt is so important to Pearl Jam, you do not have a clue! Do you play an instrument? If you don't like Matt you don't understand music. :wave:
I tend to think the opposite. It's a perfect example of forced chemistry. I'm not saying Matt is a bad drummer, but his style doesn't jive with the rest of the band. He's a tight technical drummer and they used to have such a (to borrow a Zeppelin term) tight but loose groove going on.

As the band exists now, excluding a few bright spots from Stone and Jeff on the last album, the band could exist with only Ed.

In Pearl Jam, at their best and how I think they should sound, Mike is the most replaceable, and I love lead guitar playing in the right place. He's just never been that interesting aside from writing a song here or there.

For the most part, it's been awhile since awhile since you could tell who is playing guitar in PJ, and that blame falls on whoever decided that Stone's role should be diminished.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Mine »

Oh, Jimmy wrote:
LuNY wrote:
Wishlist wrote:Drummers come and go in this band so losing Matt wouldn't change a thing (might even make them better).

But of Eddie, Stone, Mike, and Jeff which guy if they left would matter least?

Gotta go with Mike. Lead player? I can't stand lead guitar. Leave that stuff to hair metal bands. Sure Mike has written a few top songs for the band, but bottom line if he weren't on the left side of the stage, the band would still be Pearl Jam.

Matt is so important to Pearl Jam, you do not have a clue! Do you play an instrument? If you don't like Matt you don't understand music. :wave:
I tend to think the opposite. It's a perfect example of forced chemistry. I'm not saying Matt is a bad drummer, but his style doesn't jive with the rest of the band. He's a tight technical drummer and they used to have such a (to borrow a Zeppelin term) tight but loose groove going on.

As the band exists now, excluding a few bright spots from Stone and Jeff on the last album, the band could exist with only Ed.

In Pearl Jam, at their best and how I think they should sound, Mike is the most replaceable, and I love lead guitar playing in the right place. He's just never been that interesting aside from writing a song here or there.

For the most part, it's been awhile since awhile since you could tell who is playing guitar in PJ, and that blame falls on whoever decided that Stone's role should be diminished.
Stone himself decided that. He said it often happens people confuse his parts with Mike's in the sense that he writes more lead parts than he used to. I think his contribution, he called it adding colour to the songs or something similar, are in my opinion far superior than Mike's and Jeff's. He has better taste and doesn't sound like an "attention whore" in the mix. This is the biggest problem with Pearl Jam today compared to the past IMO. B'OB toy keyboards included. They used to be able to write songs that were better than the sum of their parts. I don't know, i guess sticking a kindergarten sing-along melody/bass line on a song like Gateway is imaginative and interesting but to me it sounds like an amateurish way of ruining a song.
User avatar
LuNY
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri August 02, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by LuNY »

They are ALL important. They are a band, all great players. If not for Mike the band would have never happened. He encouraged Stone to get back with Jeff. Matt is a genius rock drummer, he is like Keith Moon on roids and meth. hahaaha
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36492
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by Jorge »

Matt is pretty much the polar opposite of Keith Moon in terms of playing style.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
LuNY
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri August 02, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by LuNY »

theplatypus wrote:Matt is pretty much the polar opposite of Keith Moon in terms of playing style.

Some of his rolls are very Moonish with a little Bonzo mixed in....
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by harmless »

LuNY wrote:
Wishlist wrote:Drummers come and go in this band so losing Matt wouldn't change a thing (might even make them better).

But of Eddie, Stone, Mike, and Jeff which guy if they left would matter least?

Gotta go with Mike. Lead player? I can't stand lead guitar. Leave that stuff to hair metal bands. Sure Mike has written a few top songs for the band, but bottom line if he weren't on the left side of the stage, the band would still be Pearl Jam.

Matt is so important to Pearl Jam, you do not have a clue! Do you play an instrument? If you don't like Matt you don't understand music. :wave:
Image
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Who (Besides Matt) Can The Band Lose And It Wouldn't Mat

Post by harmless »

Jack Irons was closer to Moon, if a little less bombastic.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
Post Reply