- Spoiler: show
Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Might as well post this now just to stir the pot:
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
That's a tough game to play, because Brady's o-line didn't show up in his two Super Bowl losses. And my guess is that Montana was well protected in his four Super Bowl wins.warehouse wrote:i think super bowls and playoff record play a part in a qb's legacy, but it is a team game so that kinda stuff gets totally overstated. manning didnt play well last night, but i think most of that is b/c his line was completely overmatched. should manning's legacy be tarnished b/c his o line got its ass handed to them?Coach wrote:But if we're talking about the "greatest QB who ever lived," and the captain of the "greatest offense of all time," how do you not talk about the all-mighty one's playoff record?warehouse wrote:and coach proves my pointwarehouse wrote: lol @ one game sample. i agree about the team sport idea though, qb's get too much credit and too much blame for winning super bowls.
If you don't believe in crowning a greatest QB of all-time for the reason you cite above, then you have a valid point, but I'm pretty sure that you do have an opinion on this....
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
i know its tough, thats why we always have these debates. there's no 'wayne gretzky' of qb's, you can make an argument for like 3-5 people being the best ever.Coach wrote:That's a tough game to play, because Brady's o-line didn't show up in his two Super Bowl losses. And my guess is that Montana was well protected in his four Super Bowl wins.warehouse wrote:i think super bowls and playoff record play a part in a qb's legacy, but it is a team game so that kinda stuff gets totally overstated. manning didnt play well last night, but i think most of that is b/c his line was completely overmatched. should manning's legacy be tarnished b/c his o line got its ass handed to them?Coach wrote:But if we're talking about the "greatest QB who ever lived," and the captain of the "greatest offense of all time," how do you not talk about the all-mighty one's playoff record?warehouse wrote:and coach proves my pointwarehouse wrote: lol @ one game sample. i agree about the team sport idea though, qb's get too much credit and too much blame for winning super bowls.
If you don't believe in crowning a greatest QB of all-time for the reason you cite above, then you have a valid point, but I'm pretty sure that you do have an opinion on this....
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Agreed, Boomer Esiason said something on the radio the other day, that regardless of last night's outcome, there's Brady, Manning, Montana on "Mt Rushmore" and then 2-3 other guys perhaps a step down from that. In general, I think that's how all of this ends up.warehouse wrote:i know its tough, thats why we always have these debates. there's no 'wayne gretzky' of qb's, you can make an argument for like 3-5 people being the best ever.Coach wrote:That's a tough game to play, because Brady's o-line didn't show up in his two Super Bowl losses. And my guess is that Montana was well protected in his four Super Bowl wins.warehouse wrote:i think super bowls and playoff record play a part in a qb's legacy, but it is a team game so that kinda stuff gets totally overstated. manning didnt play well last night, but i think most of that is b/c his line was completely overmatched. should manning's legacy be tarnished b/c his o line got its ass handed to them?Coach wrote:But if we're talking about the "greatest QB who ever lived," and the captain of the "greatest offense of all time," how do you not talk about the all-mighty one's playoff record?warehouse wrote:and coach proves my pointwarehouse wrote: lol @ one game sample. i agree about the team sport idea though, qb's get too much credit and too much blame for winning super bowls.
If you don't believe in crowning a greatest QB of all-time for the reason you cite above, then you have a valid point, but I'm pretty sure that you do have an opinion on this....
There's no Michael Jordan of QB's either!
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Plus, the very nature of the rules of hockey (and basketball) makes this easier. It's just the opposite for football and baseball.warehouse wrote:i know its tough, thats why we always have these debates. there's no 'wayne gretzky' of qb's, you can make an argument for like 3-5 people being the best ever.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Green Habit wrote:Plus, the very nature of the rules of hockey (and basketball) makes this easier. It's just the opposite for football and baseball.warehouse wrote:i know its tough, thats why we always have these debates. there's no 'wayne gretzky' of qb's, you can make an argument for like 3-5 people being the best ever.
so its something like: montana, brady, manning, foles, elway, marino
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
+1 for the Green Habit account, by the way.
After New England's recent crappy play in the playoffs, I've made a point to come on here afterward, take my medicine, and give a shout out to the winning team.
Good to see Green Habit back here alive and well.
After New England's recent crappy play in the playoffs, I've made a point to come on here afterward, take my medicine, and give a shout out to the winning team.
Good to see Green Habit back here alive and well.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Now tell me how many INTs and sacks Brian Dawkins could have compiled on each one of those QBs if he played against them for their entire careers, twice a year.warehouse wrote:Green Habit wrote:Plus, the very nature of the rules of hockey (and basketball) makes this easier. It's just the opposite for football and baseball.warehouse wrote:i know its tough, thats why we always have these debates. there's no 'wayne gretzky' of qb's, you can make an argument for like 3-5 people being the best ever.![]()
so its something like: montana, brady, manning, foles, elway, marino
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
ill need a pretty badass calculator to figure that out, but there is definitely no 'brian dawkins' of qbs
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Thanks. I obviously woke up late today, so it took a while, but waiting a day/week or whatever doesn't change the past. I will say that the amount of medicine I'm taking is pretty small. I knew that the Seahawks were more than capable of winning--just didn't think they would put up a 40+ spot. I'm also quite grateful of what the Broncos did this season nonetheless.Coach wrote:+1 for the Green Habit account, by the way.
After New England's recent crappy play in the playoffs, I've made a point to come on here afterward, take my medicine, and give a shout out to the winning team.
Good to see Green Habit back here alive and well.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Hmmmm, I did build a salary cap calculator, so that might be the next logical project....warehouse wrote:ill need a pretty badass calculator to figure that out, but there is definitely no 'brian dawkins' of qbs
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Peyton Manning: Greatest Little Game Quarterback of All-Time
- ---
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
and yeah, lol @ one game sample
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Nonsense and you know it. You're too intelligent to believe that, so enjoy trolling. This is certainly the day to do it, so go for it.--- wrote:Peyton Manning: Greatest Little Game Quarterback of All-Time
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7301
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
can we consider thomas not one of the greatest ever since they havent won any SB since they were busted for cheating?
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
You're right, obviously playoff losses have been the biggest (only?) blemish on his resume. And last night added another one, so like you said, many people won't look at as a one game sample. That doesn't mean they're right to do so. You said yourself that Seattle was just plain better, and it obviously wasn't close.warehouse wrote:no, last night was one of many games peyton manning has lost in the playoffs. i understand what you are saying, but playoff losses are the biggest stain on his great career. thats why i dont think it was just a one game sample, or why most people wont look at it like that.
seattle was just better everywhere last night. that might have been the most lopsided super bowl ive ever seen.
People who want to believe that Manning chokes in big games have another game they can point to where this supposedly occurred. It's a classic case of confirmation bias. People have already chosen the narrative they believe in, and eagerly take any evidence that supports their claim while ignoring any evidence to the contrary. (See: Romo, 4th quarters) So the Broncos lose (team, not an individual) and last night was a big game that Manning choked away. Broncos beat the Pats in the AFC Championship, "well the Pats were beat up and the Broncos should have won"; that is probably true, but had the Broncos lost it would have been another big game choke for Manning, no matter how it occurred. At least that one would have made sense, playing at home against an inferior/overachieving injured team.
My belief is simple: Manning's entire career to this point is more indicative of his relative greatness as a QB than any single outcome, including all three Super Bowls. His playoff record has absolutely been substandard, and I understand this being a knock against him, for some people a major knock. Personally, I believe he is the best ever despite that, because I believe that while playoff success is a factor, my opinion is that it doesn't trump everything else. So that's my bias. But I'm also claiming that I wouldn't have shown up here today had the Broncos won claiming that last night was "proof" that he's the best.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Peyton is tough to judge for me. I think he is a top 10 QB without a doubt. His post season numbers are not that bad if you look at them in a vacuum. The stat I can't get past is he has had only 1 game winning drive/4th Quarter comeback in his post season career( Brady 7/4, Elway 6/4, Montana 5/5).4/5 wrote:Nonsense and you know it. You're too intelligent to believe that, so enjoy trolling. This is certainly the day to do it, so go for it.--- wrote:Peyton Manning: Greatest Little Game Quarterback of All-Time
He is the all time regular season leader in both with 51 and 40 respectively.
Last night was a total failure on the the Broncos part. I don't think Manning could of saved the game but I don't think he played well either.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
Just curious - how many postseason games have been close enough for a game winning drive opportunity for Manning? I don't know the answer. But, its much more telling if he's had them and failed, and the other guys haven't. But, if the games haven't been close at the end, well he's not going to have those chances, right?Thejambi wrote:
Peyton is tough to judge for me. I think he is a top 10 QB without a doubt. His post season numbers are not that bad if you look at them in a vacuum. The stat I can't get past is he has had only 1 game winning drive/4th Quarter comeback in his post season career( Brady 7/4, Elway 6/4, Montana 5/5).
He is the all time regular season leader in both with 51 and 40 respectively.
.
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Super Bowl XLVIII: The Cannabis Bowl
8 losses by 10 points or less ( 1,3,3,3,4,6,6,10)EJ wrote:Just curious - how many postseason games have been close enough for a game winning drive opportunity for Manning? I don't know the answer. But, its much more telling if he's had them and failed, and the other guys haven't. But, if the games haven't been close at the end, well he's not going to have those chances, right?Thejambi wrote:
Peyton is tough to judge for me. I think he is a top 10 QB without a doubt. His post season numbers are not that bad if you look at them in a vacuum. The stat I can't get past is he has had only 1 game winning drive/4th Quarter comeback in his post season career( Brady 7/4, Elway 6/4, Montana 5/5).
He is the all time regular season leader in both with 51 and 40 respectively.
.
4 losses by 11 points or more (14,17,41,35)
1 shut out
I don't know the context, maybe he got them close in those losses but fell short.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.

