McParadigm wrote:malice wrote:as you may remember, I don’t need to imagine the reverse situation, my mother died leaving my father to fend for himself when I was still essentially a child (13 y/o) – so I suffered the effects of her death economically in ways my older siblings didn't.
I do remember, and was trying to gently suggest my interest in you adding your experience to the list of my own, with my phrasing there. Sexy, idn't it?
unfortunately, I can’t make a point by point comparison – or not much of one, simply because we lived under different circumstances and grew up in different times- which makes a very noticeable difference in what happened in both of our situations.
The time differences, I think, have a tremendous impact.
she understood that was what society expected from her (as well as her Catholicism, which does influence what her role in society was supposed to be according to her gender).
Now that you mention that, it's amazing to me that religion hasn't come up more in this thread. My gerd. My wife's sister married a Cathaholic, and he is batshit bananas about gender. Somehow, this very intelligent former agnostic woman has totally given herself over to that. During her fourth pregnancy, she had a vascular scare which resulted in the doctor warning her that future pregnancies could be fatal. The response? Too damn bad, bucko. Sex is for babies, and women are for sex I guess. He (not she, he) just announced the SIXTH conception on Facebook with the following (appropriate) panache: "Good news everyone! My seed has found fertile ground in my wife's loins!"
That shit is word for word.
From Facebook.
So I wonder what affect the shrinking presence of religion in each subsequent generation is having on equality efforts...if either influences the other, or if they happen to be moving in tandem.
so my first question is do you believe, as I do, that her gender was what denied her the opportunity to go on to having a successful career or her economic class – as you posit? .....in all likelihood, BOTH CLASS AND GENDER should have been inhibiters to her but she overcame the class barrier just as successfully as my father did – and they were more clearly defined class barriers back then too. so both had the ‘moxie’ to do what had to be done to move from being children of peasant immigrants to upper middle class members, and good for them, right?
I'm not sure about the "more clearly defined class barriers back then" line, as my understanding is that economic upward mobility has been more and more difficult as the years pass, but I don't think that that negates what you're saying here, which is...
had my mother been a man, or had my mother lived in a society where women were openly allowed and encouraged to pursue careers they could benefit from as well as PROVIDE benefit to the society from, she’d have been a world famous clinical psychologist that solved the problems in society caused by a poor educational system that doesn’t know how to deal with emotional and developmental issues of special needs children. instead she was ‘only’ a good wife and mother that died at the age of 50, intellectually wasted (in my opinion)
Any death that young is a waste, and I would never argue that traditional gender roles were not ultimately suppressive of talent.
Conversely, if we COULD be the kind of family where there is a stay at home parent who does not work, we immediately and without hesitation would be....and that parent (by unanimous consent) would be me. If I could do anything in the world, it would be that, and my wife would be the first to tell you that I'm the more patient, nurturing, and more active parent of the two of us. Compounding decades ago, it might have been more feasible (even normal) for us to be a one-parent-stays-home unit, but it would have been...let's say complicating...for the man to be the one to stay home, or for the woman to be expected to be the primary earner.
after all that – I don’t really disagree with anything you have to say, mc p. I think you’re absolutely right about class being just as restricting as gender, and often times women of the top 40% benefit in ways their counterparts in the lower 60% never would.
To be fair, the point I was making was that economic status is MORE restricting than gender when it comes to the economics of spousal death, but I'll take a median line compromise.
but everything is a balance in the world – even the injustices. where you are hindered someone else is not and vice versa- I get that. I assume you get that too.
I fear I’ve wandered a bit off topic here, but there’s a point somewhere that correlates to your story and I can only hope some of that rings true to you.
Well, the important thing is that we not allow the gayses to marriage and do our ample best to prevent anybody from documenting all these incoming Latinos, lest we be forced to add the squalid living conditions and disparate educational opportunities their menial labor rewards them with to affect our national statistics. We can at least unite in these efforts, right?
-your pal in Ani DiFranco appreciation
You're goddamn right.
(apparently that song was about Alanis Morrisette, did you know that? I didn’t until a man told me about it, hah - isn't it ironic? don't you think?)
I don't believe it. People have made that claim about everyone from Suzanne Vega to Prince to Eddie Vedder to Sarah Mchlaughlahan. Ani's never said a word. And I've been watching that mouth, so I know.