ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by southp »

McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
For most bands from the 90's to late-2000's a vinyl pressing was an afterthought. Except for purist like Jack White.
Lightning bolt is of course mastered separately for vinyl which was long awaited from the band. As for the earlier albums I find that Ten through Riot Act all sound great and I enjoy the dynamic range better than a digital format.

While I like the albums S/T and Backspacer they are mere collectables from a vinyl-standpoint.
User avatar
aurynsdad
A Return To Form
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri January 03, 2014 10:22 pm

Re: A question about Pearl Jam on vinyl

Post by aurynsdad »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Those are some nice cans.
They were the spendiest component so far.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by LetMeSleep »

It's posturing. Ed looking hardcore whilst his bank balance grows. It would have been fascinating to see PJ steadily grow and how/if Ed was different.

Edit: too lazy to elaborate. you know what I mean though (i hope)
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Mine »

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
PJ, or:

Image
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Mine »

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
PJ, or:

Image
They hired him, not the other way around. And frankly they're a perfect fit at this point. Maybe their latest records are better of far away from audiophile sound quality.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
PJ, or:

Image
They hired him, not the other way around. And frankly they're a perfect fit at this point. Maybe their latest records are better of far away from audiophile sound quality.
Maybe you're right. It's like when they did the remix of Ten. I remember the band talking about the original mix, saying they added all the effects and reverb to cover up shoddy mistakes and imperfections in the original mix. Maybe they're still doing the same thing now, but just with shitty mixing and sound quality.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

Mine wrote:It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
Vinyl is supposed to have a separate, totally different mastering process from the CD version which is why a lot people prefer vinyl in the first place. Pearl Jam takes the cheap way out and just cuts the vinyl from the CD master. So if the CD sounds like shit, so does the vinyl. It's pretty pointless, but people buy it and play it, so Pearl Jam has no reason to change their shitty methods.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
Mine wrote:It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
Vinyl is supposed to have a separate, totally different mastering process from the CD version which is why a lot people prefer vinyl in the first place. Pearl Jam takes the cheap way out and just cuts the vinyl from the CD master. So if the CD sounds like shit, so does the vinyl. It's pretty pointless, but people buy it and play it, so Pearl Jam has no reason to change their shitty methods.
Some people are fooled, though. A lot of turntable owners (like myself) have a decent quality amp and speaker setup for their records, whereas they'll probably play the CD in the car or on a midi system or MP3 player. Naturally the vinyl will sound better due to the quality of the equipment.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: A question about Pearl Jam on vinyl

Post by Norah »

aurynsdad wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Those are some nice cans.
They were the spendiest component so far.
I have the hd598s and I fucking love them.
User avatar
aurynsdad
A Return To Form
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri January 03, 2014 10:22 pm

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by aurynsdad »

I take it all back! Problem solved: tracking force was way less than it should have been. I think the dial got moved accidentally when I moved the turntable recently. It was at 1.2 grams and it should have been at 1.8. Now everything sounds like it's dipped in sweet audio nectar, including Pearl Jam!
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Mine »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
Mine wrote:It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
Vinyl is supposed to have a separate, totally different mastering process from the CD version which is why a lot people prefer vinyl in the first place. Pearl Jam takes the cheap way out and just cuts the vinyl from the CD master. So if the CD sounds like shit, so does the vinyl. It's pretty pointless, but people buy it and play it, so Pearl Jam has no reason to change their shitty methods.
My point was that if one cares about the quality of the audio they will have the CD mastered, and mixed even before that, accordingly to begin with. I'm not sure the mastering for the CD can be used for vinyl as-is. If I'm not wrong vinyl requires some specific mastering in the extremes of the frequency spectrum because of the format's limitations.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by Mine »

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Mine wrote:
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:
McParadigm wrote:For a band that loves (loved) vinyl, I was never super impressed with Pearl Jam's wax renderings. They always, even in the very best of times, smelt of afterthought.
I don't think that any members of Pearl Jam know shit about vinyl. They probably hand it off to some record company person and totally ignore the process. That's why Pearl Jam vinyl is garbage.
I think you're right. I previously thought they had a big love for vinyl, (hence the song STBC) but most of their albums, especially the last few, have not had any love put into them whatsoever.
It would surprise me that PJ vinyl would sound particularly well when their CD's aren't nowhere near that format's potential. PJ isn't very good at evaluating what sounds good.
PJ, or:

Image
They hired him, not the other way around. And frankly they're a perfect fit at this point. Maybe their latest records are better of far away from audiophile sound quality.
Maybe you're right. It's like when they did the remix of Ten. I remember the band talking about the original mix, saying they added all the effects and reverb to cover up shoddy mistakes and imperfections in the original mix. Maybe they're still doing the same thing now, but just with shitty mixing and sound quality.
I was thinking the same thing while listening to LB. Reverb is part of the mixing process btw, i guess they had performances in mind there.
User avatar
southp
AnalLog
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: ITT: aurynsdad Asks Questions of the Vinyl Nerds

Post by southp »

aurynsdad wrote:I take it all back! Problem solved: tracking force was way less than it should have been. I think the dial got moved accidentally when I moved the turntable recently. It was at 1.2 grams and it should have been at 1.8. Now everything sounds like it's dipped in sweet audio nectar, including Pearl Jam!
I figured it was something with your setup. Enjoy the music!
Post Reply