Male terrorism never stops because they are incomplete beings. The trannies are coming to bring the next burning times. As Lucky Nickel said “The Burning Times are here again. This time men are wearing skirts instead of bibles to conduct their witch hunts on women.”
The reason we have a vagina is because if we are pregnant, the baby can come out. It’s the physical function of the vagina. There is no other way for the baby to come out than through the vagina, that’s the way it is, it’s natural. On the other hand, PIV (sex) isn’t natural, it’s an action done by men to us. They can choose not to do it, it isn’t necessary. There are many other ways of becoming pregnant than through penetration of the penis into the vagina. For instance, putting sperm on the vulva is enough to become pregnant.
(this idea) is also based on the denial that all women are, at this very moment, holocaust victims of male violence, and that the biggest and longest holocaust of all is that of men against women
I agree that using her identity as a jew and child of holocaust survivor (to complain about the holocaust references) is male-centred, but also an intersectionalist tactic to command fearful assent: it’s a silencing tactic, using the threat of being accused of racism to deflect from criticism.
oh and women aren’t naturally smaller than men, there are researchers who showed that it’s an artificial condition caused by selective breeding of women by men and millenia of malnutrition / starvation
men are generally bigger than women because of a genetic tactic they use against women. (I reported on it in my blog). Males turn off genes to make a male fetus smaller and weaker (the female preference), and turn on their own genes to make a male fetus bigger and stronger. It’s called genetic imprinting.
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
srsly though - this is worthy of a thread about feminism?McParadigm wrote:then there is no pleasing you
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Exactly. I think you're confusing a momentarily distracting "holy shit look at the crazy" playfulness with actual discussion on the topic at hand. Do we talk about the Ukraine without Putin jokes or Seinfeld references? Do we converse about the missing plane without Lost jokes? No. Are those jokes meant to trivialize or dismiss? nope.malice wrote:I don't see any relevance added to a discussion about feminism in that kind of garbage no matter who posts it - other than as pointer to: things most women will laugh at just as hard as you do in reading it. (or perhaps stand back in horror at the mental state of some people?)
mostly i find it telling that by and large this is the type if discussion that snd wants to have about feminism...McParadigm wrote:Exactly. I think you're confusing a momentarily distracting "holy shit look at the crazy" playfulness with actual discussion on the topic at hand. Do we talk about the Ukraine without Putin jokes or Seinfeld references? Do we converse about the missing plane without Lost jokes? No. Are those jokes meant to trivialize or dismiss? nope.malice wrote:I don't see any relevance added to a discussion about feminism in that kind of garbage no matter who posts it - other than as pointer to: things most women will laugh at just as hard as you do in reading it. (or perhaps stand back in horror at the mental state of some people?)
Not everything is a joke, mal. But some things are. And those things are not meant to further such discussion, but as an aside.
As for other peoples' behaviors, suffice to say they are not mine.
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
team mcparadigm, interestingly enoughMcParadigm wrote:Exactly. I think you're confusing a momentarily distracting "holy shit look at the crazy" playfulness with actual discussion on the topic at hand. Do we talk about the Ukraine without Putin jokes or Seinfeld references? Do we converse about the missing plane without Lost jokes? No. Are those jokes meant to trivialize or dismiss? nope.malice wrote:I don't see any relevance added to a discussion about feminism in that kind of garbage no matter who posts it - other than as pointer to: things most women will laugh at just as hard as you do in reading it. (or perhaps stand back in horror at the mental state of some people?)
Not everything is a joke, mal. But some things are. And those things are not meant to further such discussion, but as an aside.
As for other peoples' behaviors, suffice to say they are not mine.
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
I already knew this witchwind blog, it surely brings the lulz.McParadigm wrote:Is humanbass posting in here yet?
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
Bammer wrote:I haven't read a single word of this thread but I do have a contribution.
I have a quasi-friend-acquaintance who is very outspoken for women's rights. He is a dude. A very pro-feminist dude.
What if I said to him - "Buddy you are defeating your own purpose. By fighting for the ladies' cause you are belittling them, as if to say they can't fight for themselves."
Do you think he would appreciate the irony of his actions and give it a rest finally?
Or do you think he'd get pissed, freak out, and have an aneurism?
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
Let's not let this one avoid detection.Green Habit wrote:
At this point, Father rattles off the old cliche about worrying about one penis versus all the other penises. I was trying to formulate some snappy comeback involving vaginas, but by then the discussion petered out.
McParadigm wrote:lol
