- Spoiler: show
2013 NFL Offseason
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Oh man...Mike Florio and Greg? Aiello just got into an awesome catfight on Twitter over the Lauren Silberman debacle.
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
The Chiefs remind me of the Panthers from a two years ago, a decent overall team that had a horrible record due to basically having no QB and no offense to speak of beyond a very conservative running game. This team isn't that different than the one that made the playoffs two years ago beyond their QB play completely nosediving.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
This story is #inspiring; #empowering and #uplifting
It's all about squeezing that last little bit out of the TV audience, kind of like the Oscars and getting Seth Macfarlane to host.
There have to be better ways to encourage female viewership, it doesn't always have to be a poorly conceived stunt.
It's all about squeezing that last little bit out of the TV audience, kind of like the Oscars and getting Seth Macfarlane to host.
There have to be better ways to encourage female viewership, it doesn't always have to be a poorly conceived stunt.
- mray10
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:54 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Yeah, they scare me as much as anyone in the division. Huge upgrade at coach and a sizable if not gigantic upgrade at QB. Only the two most meaningful positions you can upgrade. And they already had a solid defense and running game.Green Habit wrote:So Dwayne Bowe finally agreed to a long term deal with the Chiefs. Like I've said before, fans like d,t should keep on being a bit more optimistic with Kansas City. I know that I'm more nervous that the Broncos might actually have some decent competition in the division next year.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
$11 mil for Bowe makes me a little nervous about what Miami will offer to Wallace or Jennings.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
They've got a ton of cap room, they've got the ability to pay up if need be.4/5 wrote:$11 mil for Bowe makes me a little nervous about what Miami will offer to Wallace or Jennings.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
So just for fun, before free agency starts here are my guesses on how teams are looking for 2013.
Six teams that were good last year that should stay good: DEN, NE, GB, ATL, SF, SEA
Six teams that were bad/mediocre last year that could be better: MIA, TEN, KC, NYG, NO, STL
Six teams that were good/decent last year that could be worse: BAL, PIT, CIN, IND, DAL, MIN
Six teams that were bad last year that should stay bad: NYJ, CLE, JAX, OAK, DET, ARI
Six teams that were good last year that should stay good: DEN, NE, GB, ATL, SF, SEA
Six teams that were bad/mediocre last year that could be better: MIA, TEN, KC, NYG, NO, STL
Six teams that were good/decent last year that could be worse: BAL, PIT, CIN, IND, DAL, MIN
Six teams that were bad last year that should stay bad: NYJ, CLE, JAX, OAK, DET, ARI
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Doesn't Indy have a ton of cap room? I'd be surprised if they were worse only because their division still sucks aside from Houston (who I think is overrated anyway) and I figure Luck will only be better next year now that he has a year under his beltGreen Habit wrote:So just for fun, before free agency starts here are my guesses on how teams are looking for 2013.
Six teams that were good last year that should stay good: DEN, NE, GB, ATL, SF, SEA
Six teams that were bad/mediocre last year that could be better: MIA, TEN, KC, NYG, NO, STL
Six teams that were good/decent last year that could be worse: BAL, PIT, CIN, IND, DAL, MIN
Six teams that were bad last year that should stay bad: NYJ, CLE, JAX, OAK, DET, ARI
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
They do have a lot of cap room, and they could be poised to make some big additions. I just think that they caught a lot of teams by surprise last year and it won't be quite as easy this year. They're not going to be horrible but a 7-8-9 win season wouldn't surprise me.MattA75 wrote:Doesn't Indy have a ton of cap room? I'd be surprised if they were worse only because their division still sucks aside from Houston (who I think is overrated anyway) and I figure Luck will only be better next year now that he has a year under his beltGreen Habit wrote:So just for fun, before free agency starts here are my guesses on how teams are looking for 2013.
Six teams that were good last year that should stay good: DEN, NE, GB, ATL, SF, SEA
Six teams that were bad/mediocre last year that could be better: MIA, TEN, KC, NYG, NO, STL
Six teams that were good/decent last year that could be worse: BAL, PIT, CIN, IND, DAL, MIN
Six teams that were bad last year that should stay bad: NYJ, CLE, JAX, OAK, DET, ARI
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
For now. Franchised Starks (which I like) and now this rumored $6.5 for Hartline, I'm starting to get nervous that Ireland is going to do what Carolina did a couple of years ago, which was to fall in love with their own talent even though that talent took them all the way to like a 2-14 season.Green Habit wrote:They've got a ton of cap room, they've got the ability to pay up if need be.4/5 wrote:$11 mil for Bowe makes me a little nervous about what Miami will offer to Wallace or Jennings.
I realize that in free agency you generally have to overpay for top guys, but I still don't like it. But this team is so bad at WR that's probably the route they have to go. I wouldn't mind them signing Wallace but still spending one or two of their first five picks (in the the first three rounds) on a couple other WRs.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
If we had the Jay Cutler thread on the new board, I would totally post this tweet in it:
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
if only admins had the power to create threads...
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
I don't know if an article about fish tweezers on a wedding registry was enough to start an entire thread in the sports forum with.Mecca wrote:if only admins had the power to create threads...
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000 ... me-by-textGreen Habit wrote:I don't know if an article about fish tweezers on a wedding registry was enough to start an entire thread in the sports forum with.Mecca wrote:if only admins had the power to create threads...
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
I want Tebow to go to the Patriots. There I said it. I feel dirty all over for admitting it. And no, it's not in the "I hope he goes there and is a disaster" kind of way. I want the Pats to trade Mallet and groom Tebow to be Brady's successor. 
The oddest part of this desire is that Pats fans would probably recoil at the thought and fans of every other team would probably rejoice.
The oddest part of this desire is that Pats fans would probably recoil at the thought and fans of every other team would probably rejoice.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
While everyone talks about the McDaniels connection, it's important to remember that he never considered starting Tebow even when the Broncos' season was going down the drain. It could just be as likely that McD thought that Tebow wasn't going to work out.4/5 wrote:I want Tebow to go to the Patriots. There I said it. I feel dirty all over for admitting it. And no, it's not in the "I hope he goes there and is a disaster" kind of way. I want the Pats to trade Mallet and groom Tebow to be Brady's successor.
The oddest part of this desire is that Pats fans would probably recoil at the thought and fans of every other team would probably rejoice.
Tebow's problem, which really isn't his fault, is that he'll bring the Tebowmaniacs to wherever he goes, and that may turn teams off.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Tebow to the Pats, would put him in the same place he is with the Jets. Brady isn't leaving for 4 years. Tebow needs to go somewhere that he can play and play a lot if he's going to be the QB. Like Arizona (which would make Larry Fitz pull what's left of his hair out) I still like the idea of him working with Mike Mularkey but if the Kybosh is on there, there are plenty of places with poor QB play I'm just not sure there are going to be any takers. He's got a great skill set in general, he's just not NFL accurate when it comes to passing.
If he goes to the Pats, it makes a lot more sense using him as a back with Brady on the field at QB and more of the way Florida did his freshman year. If he gets enough playing time (and he might have enough by now in practice, he could work his way into a position, but I think it's going to take more time with people seeing him do it as a QB to believe he's a QB, until then he just needs to be on the field. He's a freaking weapon in the backfield, a throwback to 60's Wingbacks. Just put on RB pads, and protect his damned shoulders. The heavy looks they could display and pass out of would be ridiculous.
As far as Revis, I love the fact that I could get the NFL's comeback player of the year next year in a contract season for a decent price for one year. He's a steal for an already well built team like San Francisco. Get him for a year and let him bolt for Dallas for 12 million a season after the season.
If he goes to the Pats, it makes a lot more sense using him as a back with Brady on the field at QB and more of the way Florida did his freshman year. If he gets enough playing time (and he might have enough by now in practice, he could work his way into a position, but I think it's going to take more time with people seeing him do it as a QB to believe he's a QB, until then he just needs to be on the field. He's a freaking weapon in the backfield, a throwback to 60's Wingbacks. Just put on RB pads, and protect his damned shoulders. The heavy looks they could display and pass out of would be ridiculous.
As far as Revis, I love the fact that I could get the NFL's comeback player of the year next year in a contract season for a decent price for one year. He's a steal for an already well built team like San Francisco. Get him for a year and let him bolt for Dallas for 12 million a season after the season.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Yeah, this is really the worst part of it. Any team who would consider taking him has to deal with the potential ESPN circus and will likely decided that whatever potential benefit he may (or may not) have above other available options simply isn't worth the ESPNgasm that follows him around.Green Habit wrote:Tebow's problem, which really isn't his fault, is that he'll bring the Tebowmaniacs to wherever he goes, and that may turn teams off.
I'd rather Tebow go into a situation where he has no chance of playing, and will therefore bring no controversy with him, like New England. Just let him sit back and learn from a master. He's not accurate enough to last in the league right now. But I really believe that he can overcome that with time.Electromatic wrote:Tebow to the Pats, would put him in the same place he is with the Jets. Brady isn't leaving for 4 years. Tebow needs to go somewhere that he can play and play a lot if he's going to be the QB. Like Arizona (which would make Larry Fitz pull what's left of his hair out) I still like the idea of him working with Mike Mularkey but if the Kybosh is on there, there are plenty of places with poor QB play I'm just not sure there are going to be any takers. He's got a great skill set in general, he's just not NFL accurate when it comes to passing.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/c ... ess-426271
Asked about the future of DirecTV's NFL Sunday Ticket amid rising sports costs, [DirecTv CFO] said that if the price tag went too high in the next rights deal negotiations, DirecTV would consider striking a non-exclusive deal with the NFL or possibly even dropping the package. DirecTV's current NFL Sunday Ticket deal expires in 2015.
Can't help but wonder if the Redzone, available to cable and other satellite companies, ate into the demand? I can see the Sunday Ticket having value if your favorite team is not the local team but otherwise why not just have the almost always Redzone?
Asked about the future of DirecTV's NFL Sunday Ticket amid rising sports costs, [DirecTv CFO] said that if the price tag went too high in the next rights deal negotiations, DirecTV would consider striking a non-exclusive deal with the NFL or possibly even dropping the package. DirecTV's current NFL Sunday Ticket deal expires in 2015.
Can't help but wonder if the Redzone, available to cable and other satellite companies, ate into the demand? I can see the Sunday Ticket having value if your favorite team is not the local team but otherwise why not just have the almost always Redzone?
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2013 NFL Offseason
Falcons get their stadium deal,
In other news, politicians and rich people still shit all over taxpayers and poor people alike so that rich people can watch football in a comfortable new seat.
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/falcons-re ... rms/nWkLb/
In other news, politicians and rich people still shit all over taxpayers and poor people alike so that rich people can watch football in a comfortable new seat.
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/falcons-re ... rms/nWkLb/