Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rate Lost Dogs

5 Stars: As good as any of the records
19
25%
4 Stars: really strong
44
58%
3 Stars: average
10
13%
2 Stars: Meh
3
4%
1 Star: sucks
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by B »

Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Puzzles and games should have been on the official release for this
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

I reread some of the song notes to this a few weeks ago, and chuckled when I saw Ed's "close but no sitar" comment about Hold On. Never really made sense until they released the other version with the Vs/Vitalogy reissue.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

dimejinky99 wrote:Puzzles and games should have been on the official release for this
puzzles and games should have been on binaural
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by EJ »

I listened to this yesterday. Good album.

Small pet peeve: wish they used the original versions for some of these (lyric changes and updated vocals). Haven't read the notes in years - which ones were updated? Hard To Imagine, Alone, Wash, and Hold On come to mind.

And, was there ever an electric version of Footsteps recorded?
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

Stip wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Puzzles and games should have been on the official release for this
puzzles and games should have been on binaural
i wonder though, would light years be as loved as puzzles and games had they been reversed? i really like light years, and think i like puzzles and games as much as i do because it was different and new compared to light years which i listened to so much that i kinda wore out.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

I've never liked Light Years but I think Puzzles & Games is great.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Birds in Hell wrote:I've never liked Light Years but I think Puzzles & Games is great.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

well that's not true. I kinda liked it.
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Farmer John »

I always thought both were just alright.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by digster »

Puzzles and Games is one of the most overrated PJ songs, imo.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

EJ wrote:I listened to this yesterday. Good album.

Small pet peeve: wish they used the original versions for some of these (lyric changes and updated vocals). Haven't read the notes in years - which ones were updated? Hard To Imagine, Alone, Wash, and Hold On come to mind.

And, was there ever an electric version of Footsteps recorded?
Dude, like fucking all of 'em. It's annoying. Lost Dogs would have been so much better if they'd just left it all alone. The vanity on this release is a major turn off.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

digster wrote:Puzzles and Games is one of the most overrated PJ songs, imo.
I think I like it more than Light Years. But I admit a bit of a Don't Gimme No Lip thing, too. I like DGNL more than Mankind, but I can't be confident that I like it more because it's better. I feel like I might like it more because it's different. If DGNL had been on No Code and Mankind on LD, would I think Mankind was better?
User avatar
Scott
A Return To Form
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 2:52 am
Location: Tampa Bay, FL

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Scott »

Over the years, I've probably listened to this album more than any other PJ record except Ten....
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

There was no reason for re-doing the vocals on all that old shit. Totally stupid. Whoever came up with that idea deserves a fresh buttfucking.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

i really liked that they made all those small changes. I had the originals. Even when the originals are superior (as they often were) this was still a slightly new version of an old song, so it was a nice change of pace, gave insight into the original, etc.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

Stip wrote:i really liked that they made all those small changes. I had the originals. Even when the originals are superior (as they often were) this was still a slightly new version of an old song, so it was a nice change of pace, gave insight into the original, etc.
I agree with some of the long established songs. Things like Footsteps or Alone. Those other versions had been officially released and it was nice to have a fresh take.

But what about the stuff we hadn't heard before? How much of that was tinkered with? And why? If Sad, Education, In The Moonlight, Fatal, Hold On, etc were all fucked with (and it seems like they were, if to varying degrees) I want the original, un-fucked-with versions.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Stip wrote:i really liked that they made all those small changes. I had the originals. Even when the originals are superior (as they often were) this was still a slightly new version of an old song, so it was a nice change of pace, gave insight into the original, etc.
I agree with some of the long established songs. Things like Footsteps or Alone. Those other versions had been officially released and it was nice to have a fresh take.

But what about the stuff we hadn't heard before? How much of that was tinkered with? And why? If Sad, Education, In The Moonlight, Fatal, Hold On, etc were all fucked with (and it seems like they were, if to varying degrees) I want the original, un-fucked-with versions.
yeah, but if you are just hearing the song for the first time then I don't see why them giving you the song as they currently interpret it is a problem. And if you are the kind of person who will be compelled to seek out the original versions they are out there and not hard to find. Do you need them?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

Stip wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Stip wrote:i really liked that they made all those small changes. I had the originals. Even when the originals are superior (as they often were) this was still a slightly new version of an old song, so it was a nice change of pace, gave insight into the original, etc.
I agree with some of the long established songs. Things like Footsteps or Alone. Those other versions had been officially released and it was nice to have a fresh take.

But what about the stuff we hadn't heard before? How much of that was tinkered with? And why? If Sad, Education, In The Moonlight, Fatal, Hold On, etc were all fucked with (and it seems like they were, if to varying degrees) I want the original, un-fucked-with versions.
yeah, but if you are just hearing the song for the first time then I don't see why them giving you the song as they currently interpret it is a problem. And if you are the kind of person who will be compelled to seek out the original versions they are out there and not hard to find. Do you need them?
I know I've heard the original Hold On. Not sure about the others. Don't think I have those.

For me it's the vanity of it. I didn't see it as a reinterpretation, I saw it as a concealer. I want blemishes and all, ya know? Just seemed like the gussied these songs up to cover perceived flaws, to make themselves (or Ed specifically) look/sound better.

More often than not, it didn't work. For me. New vocals. Changed lyrics. Blech. I want great quality versions of the original sounds.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Lost Dogs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

for the songs you haven't heard I think the LD versions are superior, for what it's worth
Post Reply