Era of the moment: 1991-1992

General Pearl Jam discussion.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

I feel there should be a thread for this. The guys were never as good when they were young, broke but up and coming. I'm off today having few beers listening to them during these times. HOLY FUCK THEY WERE ELECTRIC....WTF HAPPENED TO EDDIES VOICE. .....
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by EJ »

what kind of beer are you drinking?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

meh on this era
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Any old time fans out there? Do you remember when Eddie was somewhat a man of mystery and intrigue?I reremember. Days before web
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

EJ wrote:what kind of beer are you drinking?
I have 4 budweiser tall boys from last weekend. HITTING THE SPOT
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

they got even better just a few years later
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
You serious? Come on now
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nyquillyn »

I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan?
I'm also meh on this era.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

turned2black wrote:I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan?
I'm also meh on this era.
Where you a fan then? If not you opinion is moot
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
eddies voice peaked around 98
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nyquillyn »

Yes, a huge fan. So big a fan that I wore long johns under my shorts during August in Phoenix.

1994 to 2000 :thumbsup:
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
eddies voice peaked around 98
That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLEND
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
eddies voice peaked around 98
That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLEND
well which is it, was it in steady decline since 92 or did it peak in 94 ?
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by EJ »

They were certainly exciting in those very early years. And, yes, Ed's soaring vocals and his mystique was a huge part of the appeal. The "Animal/RIFW" performance on the 93 MTV Video Awards was one of the most goosebump raising things they'd to that point. It was raw, powerful, and separated them from the pack.

But, if I had to choose the best period of the band, it'd be 1994-2000 - a much more creative band and Ed's talents as an all-around singer improved dramatically.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Show me one show better than their unplugged in 1992. That was in queens. I was living in Brooklyn at that time
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.
maybe but I'm not saying pearl jam didn't get good until no code or something

ten era pearl jam was great but they got so much better just 2 years later
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.

DING-DING. ...WE HAVE A WINNER
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Strat »

It is pretty remarkable to think of their growth within such a short period of time.

This period is pretty incredible but looking back knowing what better came - its not my favorite. Certainly being a fan during the time was pretty incredible but 95-2000 pearl jam was phenomenal.
Post Reply