Era of the moment: 1991-1992
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Era of the moment: 1991-1992
I feel there should be a thread for this. The guys were never as good when they were young, broke but up and coming. I'm off today having few beers listening to them during these times. HOLY FUCK THEY WERE ELECTRIC....WTF HAPPENED TO EDDIES VOICE. .....
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
what kind of beer are you drinking?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
meh on this era
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
Any old time fans out there? Do you remember when Eddie was somewhat a man of mystery and intrigue?I reremember. Days before web
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
I have 4 budweiser tall boys from last weekend. HITTING THE SPOTEJ wrote:what kind of beer are you drinking?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
they got even better just a few years later
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
You serious? Come on nowcutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan?
I'm also meh on this era.
I'm also meh on this era.
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
Where you a fan then? If not you opinion is mootturned2black wrote:I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan?
I'm also meh on this era.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
eddies voice peaked around 98nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
Yes, a huge fan. So big a fan that I wore long johns under my shorts during August in Phoenix.
1994 to 2000
1994 to 2000
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLENDcutuphalfdead wrote:eddies voice peaked around 98nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
well which is it, was it in steady decline since 92 or did it peak in 94 ?nightmareblack0206 wrote:That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLENDcutuphalfdead wrote:eddies voice peaked around 98nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
They were certainly exciting in those very early years. And, yes, Ed's soaring vocals and his mystique was a huge part of the appeal. The "Animal/RIFW" performance on the 93 MTV Video Awards was one of the most goosebump raising things they'd to that point. It was raw, powerful, and separated them from the pack.
But, if I had to choose the best period of the band, it'd be 1994-2000 - a much more creative band and Ed's talents as an all-around singer improved dramatically.
But, if I had to choose the best period of the band, it'd be 1994-2000 - a much more creative band and Ed's talents as an all-around singer improved dramatically.
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
Show me one show better than their unplugged in 1992. That was in queens. I was living in Brooklyn at that time
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
maybe but I'm not saying pearl jam didn't get good until no code or somethingDr. Van Nostrand wrote:only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
ten era pearl jam was great but they got so much better just 2 years later
-
nightmareblack0206
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
DING-DING. ...WE HAVE A WINNER
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992
It is pretty remarkable to think of their growth within such a short period of time.
This period is pretty incredible but looking back knowing what better came - its not my favorite. Certainly being a fan during the time was pretty incredible but 95-2000 pearl jam was phenomenal.
This period is pretty incredible but looking back knowing what better came - its not my favorite. Certainly being a fan during the time was pretty incredible but 95-2000 pearl jam was phenomenal.