Era of the moment: 1991-1992

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

you know you're right. its impossible to listen to old recordings and judge their quality
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

EJ wrote:They were certainly exciting in those very early years. And, yes, Ed's soaring vocals and his mystique was a huge part of the appeal. The "Animal/RIFW" performance on the 93 MTV Video Awards was one of the most goosebump raising things they'd to that point. It was raw, powerful, and separated them
But, if I had to choose the best period of the band, it'd be 1994-2000 - a much more creative band and Ed's talents as an all-around singer improved dramatically.

Noooooooo

Their sickest most powerful performance was JEREMY 1992 MTVA
Last edited by nightmareblack0206 on Mon March 11, 2013 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Strat »

cutuphalfdead wrote:you know you're right. its impossible to listen to old recordings and judge their quality

yea but come on...sometimes being a fan is more than that. I do agree with you about the period though.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

in fact not having the emotional baggage from "being there" probably lets you judge more objectively
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Now that performance will give you goosebumps
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nyquillyn »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.
Yes, you are wrong. While yeah, this era is what got me interested, the Vitalogy-Merkin Ball-No Code stretch is really what elevated them to favorite band territory for me.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Me too BUT No Code was a TREMENDOUS let down for me
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by stip »

They were a force of nature in those years. I think they've all improved in terms of craft since there, but they were tapping into something there that I never expect to experience again.
Sigerson
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Sigerson »

Count me as another one who's not a huge fan of this era. I didn't grow up with them so maybe that's it.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

stip wrote:They were a force of nature in those years. I think they've all improved in terms of craft since there, but they were tapping into something there that I never expect to experience again.

Perfectly put Stip.....
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by bada »

I remember Eddie was a goofball until Kurt Cobain talked shit and then Eddie got real serious and tortured. I kid. They were awesome back then.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

bada wrote:I remember Eddie was a goofball until Kurt Cobain talked shit and then Eddie got real serious and tortured. I kid. They were awesome back then. They were the most important thing in my life back then.

It's funny that you said that because they were the most important thing in my life to
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL8ge4Y9kuI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I find that awkward and embarrassing to watch. I never really cared for the band till Vitalogy. Ten is pretty close to hair metal but is enjoyable as some hair metal is. I much prefer 1994 - 1998.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
WtOB?
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4818
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 7:03 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/humdinger_dman
Location: by the ocean
Contact:

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by WtOB? »

I really don't care for Dave A's drumming.
Dev wrote:i love listening to the leaked pj song "last word".
its_not_1974
A Return To Form
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat January 12, 2013 7:40 am
Location: Saguesera

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by its_not_1974 »

Just because Eddie was louder, and a little off his rocker, doesn't make it better. It did when I first got into Pearl Jam, because that intensity is so engaging.

Hell, IMO his voice didn't even dip at all until 95ish, (and then came back better than ever for a few years) and by then Vitalogy existed, so.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Noaheb »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated
eddies voice peaked around 98
YES
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:meh on this era
only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though.
maybe but I'm not saying pearl jam didn't get good until no code or something

ten era pearl jam was great but they got so much better just 2 years later
I agree with that
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL8ge4Y9kuI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I find that awkward and embarrassing to watch. I never really cared for the band till Vitalogy. Ten is pretty close to hair metal but is enjoyable as some hair metal is. I much prefer 1994 - 1998.
im not sure if you arent familiar with hair metal or you arent familiar w/ ten. by the late 80s hair metal was simply pop songs for teenage girls by dudes dressed like morons. the album ten can be argued as a concept album about death. it has pop-rock songs, but it also has anthems, ballads, straight up hard rock and whatever you wanna call release. hair metal and the album ten have nothing in common except for the time and place. the closest thing you can compare it to is appetite for destruction, but i dont thing gnr were hair metal.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

cutuphalfdead wrote:in fact not having the emotional baggage from "being there" probably lets you judge more objectively
I think i am pretty objective, my fav albums are no code and yield, ten and vs are near the bottom, but no where near dismissable, they are amazing albums, but they certainly did get much better on the run from vitalogy through binaural, those 4 albums are just amazing
Post Reply