Era of the moment: 1991-1992

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Norah »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:in fact not having the emotional baggage from "being there" probably lets you judge more objectively
I think i am pretty objective, my fav albums are no code and yield, ten and vs are near the bottom, but no where near dismissable, they are amazing albums, but they certainly did get much better on the run from vitalogy through binaural, those 4 albums are just amazing
We're not so different, you and I.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

OMFG@ past 3 days i cannot stop listening to 10 redux and 10 early demos. AMAZNG! PJ COME BACK TO US
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:OMFG@ past 3 days i cannot stop listening to 10 redux and 10 early demos. AMAZNG! PJ COME BACK TO US
how about 1992 bootlegs from europe? the album can suck a dick compared to their live performances then.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Hey you guys ever see THE APPARITION with Ashley Green? OFF THE CHARTS SMOKING HOT. Girl is GORGEOUS
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

warehouse wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:OMFG@ past 3 days i cannot stop listening to 10 redux and 10 early demos. AMAZNG! PJ COME BACK TO US
how about 1992 bootlegs from europe? the album can suck a dick compared to their live performances then.

I have the actual video to those shows in Europe of 92
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

nightmareblack0206 wrote:
warehouse wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:OMFG@ past 3 days i cannot stop listening to 10 redux and 10 early demos. AMAZNG! PJ COME BACK TO US
how about 1992 bootlegs from europe? the album can suck a dick compared to their live performances then.

I have the actual video to those shows in Europe of 92
send me all of them. and a vcr.
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

warehouse wrote:
Blenheim Augustine wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL8ge4Y9kuI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I find that awkward and embarrassing to watch. I never really cared for the band till Vitalogy. Ten is pretty close to hair metal but is enjoyable as some hair metal is. I much prefer 1994 - 1998.
im not sure if you arent familiar with hair metal or you arent familiar w/ ten. by the late 80s hair metal was simply pop songs for teenage girls by dudes dressed like morons. the album ten can be argued as a concept album about death. it has pop-rock songs, but it also has anthems, ballads, straight up hard rock and whatever you wanna call release. hair metal and the album ten have nothing in common except for the time and place. the closest thing you can compare it to is appetite for destruction, but i dont thing gnr were hair metal.
I remember a lot of people calling them the grunge Bon Jovi at that time. It wasn't till they cleaned up their act on Vs and toned down the excessive solos, wild hair twirling and lyric-less moaning that they could be taken seriously as a band.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
warehouse wrote:
Blenheim Augustine wrote:
nightmareblack0206 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL8ge4Y9kuI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I find that awkward and embarrassing to watch. I never really cared for the band till Vitalogy. Ten is pretty close to hair metal but is enjoyable as some hair metal is. I much prefer 1994 - 1998.
im not sure if you arent familiar with hair metal or you arent familiar w/ ten. by the late 80s hair metal was simply pop songs for teenage girls by dudes dressed like morons. the album ten can be argued as a concept album about death. it has pop-rock songs, but it also has anthems, ballads, straight up hard rock and whatever you wanna call release. hair metal and the album ten have nothing in common except for the time and place. the closest thing you can compare it to is appetite for destruction, but i dont thing gnr were hair metal.
I remember a lot of people calling them the grunge Bon Jovi at that time. It wasn't till they cleaned up their act on Vs and toned down the excessive solos, wild hair twirling and lyric-less moaning that they could be taken seriously as a band.
wtf r u even talking about? the only people that called them "grunge bon jovi" were insecure nirvana fans. eddie vedder has always used his voice as an instrument, and vs has a ton of solos.
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

warehouse wrote:wtf r u even talking about? the only people that called them "grunge bon jovi" were insecure nirvana fans. eddie vedder has always used his voice as an instrument, and vs has a ton of solos.
I'm just saying what some people said at the time (and not just Nirvana fans). Vs has solos but not "excessive" solos (e.g. Alive) and they have never really returned to the "wooooaaaahh ooooo oooo oo oh ooh ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai yea-e-eh" bits like on Jeremy.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
warehouse wrote:wtf r u even talking about? the only people that called them "grunge bon jovi" were insecure nirvana fans. eddie vedder has always used his voice as an instrument, and vs has a ton of solos.
I'm just saying what some people said at the time (and not just Nirvana fans). Vs has solos but not "excessive" solos (e.g. Alive) and they have never really returned to the "wooooaaaahh ooooo oooo oo oh ooh ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai yea-e-eh" bits like on Jeremy.
he's done this for the bands entire career

wtf is "arc"?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by stip »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
warehouse wrote:wtf r u even talking about? the only people that called them "grunge bon jovi" were insecure nirvana fans. eddie vedder has always used his voice as an instrument, and vs has a ton of solos.
I'm just saying what some people said at the time (and not just Nirvana fans). Vs has solos but not "excessive" solos (e.g. Alive) and they have never really returned to the "wooooaaaahh ooooo oooo oo oh ooh ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai yea-e-eh" bits like on Jeremy.
bon jovi did that?
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10372
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by liebzz »

My memory of it all was that this was around the end of a time as a teenager when you had to pick sides and stick with it. People who liked rap music didn't like rock music and people who liked Nirvana didn't like Pearl Jam. Why this was the case at the time and had stoked weird competitive contrasts is mostly unclear outside of typical teenage BS. Somehow this was all played out in the media, no doubt with a big assist from Kurt Cobain.

I do not remember people comparing Pearl Jam to Bon Jovi. I remember everything being about Eddie Vedder and Kurt Cobain and arguing over who was the "authentic" rock star. Really total nonsense in hindsight.
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nyquillyn »

I had lots of friends that liked both PJ and Nirvana.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by EJ »

Yeah, mostly everyone I knew liked both bands.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10372
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by liebzz »

I liked both bands myself, but remember that back and forth. Or perhaps I was right way back when and my high school was an exceptionally f---ed up place. And here I thought I gained perspective on life in the last 20 years...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by stip »

I loved both but you still had to choose a side.
nyquillyn
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5825
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by nyquillyn »

I never had to choose a side. And it was nowhere near as rough as the Depeche Mode vs. The Cure war of the late 80s. Middle-class white kids stabbing each other. It was brutal.
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by warehouse »

turned2black wrote:I never had to choose a side. And it was nowhere near as rough as the Depeche Mode vs. The Cure war of the late 80s. Middle-class white kids stabbing each other. It was brutal.
:haha: that was hysterical

"i love nirvana, they just arent as good as pearl jam"
Tj
Future Drummer
Posts: 2132
Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by Tj »

Really like the idea of this thread, and the threads to follow. To me this is one of the more interesting aspects of the band. Their change from 1990-96 reminds me alot of the Beatles. Ed in the begining was Like a Jim Morrison type of frontman. I think Ed 1991 I think Morrison, Plant, Ozzy, Axl, and Mercury. I think Ed post 94 I think Strummer, Springsteen, Neil Young, Tom Petty,and Lennon. So very different styles. I like the later much better. In the period of Ten, Ed just was looking to do a good job for this new band. It was selfless on his part we know he had stuff like Betterman, Believe You Me. So Ten was my least favorite time for the band, but it really produced a special record.
Last edited by Tj on Wed March 13, 2013 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
oasisfan35
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4684
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992

Post by oasisfan35 »

Tj wrote:Really like the idea of this thread, and the threads to follow. To me this is one of the more interesting aspects of the band. Their change from 1990-96 reminds me alot of the Beatles. Ed in the begining was Like a Jim Morrison type of frontman. I think Ed 1991 I think Morrison, Plant, Ozzy, Axl, Mercury. I think Ed post 94 I think Strummer, Springstein, Neil Young, Tom Petty, Lennon,.So very different styles. I like the later much better. In the period of Ten, Ed just was looking to do a good job for this new band. It was selfless on his part we know he had stuff like Betterman, Believe You Me. So Ten was my least favorite time for the band, but it really produced a special record.
I get your argument, barring grammar, but please spell Bruce Springsteen's name correctly.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
Post Reply