cutuphalfdead wrote:They're canning the transfer rule effective tonight. Excellent news.
good riddance
That might have been the worst attempted rule change I've ever seen. What was wrong with the way it was before?
I have no problem with having a replay system, but they have to do something to make it work better. It's awful watching managers slowly saunter out to start small talk with the umpire while waiting for someone to give him the thumbs up. They should have to make the call right away.
cutuphalfdead wrote:They're canning the transfer rule effective tonight. Excellent news.
good riddance
That might have been the worst attempted rule change I've ever seen. What was wrong with the way it was before?
I have no problem with having a replay system, but they have to do something to make it work better. It's awful watching managers slowly saunter out to start small talk with the umpire while waiting for someone to give him the thumbs up. They should have to make the call right away.
And then, after that time has passed we've all had enough time to see the replay a few times and know what the call should be. So why does it take so much time to get an answer from new york after the umps put on the headphones? When those headphones go on the answer should be nearly instant.
philpritchard wrote:
I have no problem with having a replay system, but they have to do something to make it work better. It's awful watching managers slowly saunter out to start small talk with the umpire while waiting for someone to give him the thumbs up. They should have to make the call right away.
Agreed. No need to can the replay, just fix the current flaws.
cutuphalfdead wrote:They're canning the transfer rule effective tonight. Excellent news.
good riddance
That might have been the worst attempted rule change I've ever seen. What was wrong with the way it was before?
I have no problem with having a replay system, but they have to do something to make it work better. It's awful watching managers slowly saunter out to start small talk with the umpire while waiting for someone to give him the thumbs up. They should have to make the call right away.
And then, after that time has passed we've all had enough time to see the replay a few times and know what the call should be. So why does it take so much time to get an answer from new york after the umps put on the headphones? When those headphones go on the answer should be nearly instant.
It should. And I don't know the answer to that. But that would fall under that "they have to do something to make it work better" part I was talking about. They should be able to have the manager challenge the play, get the headphones on and make the final call within a matter of seconds. The waiting around thing is ridiculous. They're done a horrible job implementing it.
cutuphalfdead wrote:They're canning the transfer rule effective tonight. Excellent news.
good riddance
That might have been the worst attempted rule change I've ever seen. What was wrong with the way it was before?
I have no problem with having a replay system, but they have to do something to make it work better. It's awful watching managers slowly saunter out to start small talk with the umpire while waiting for someone to give him the thumbs up. They should have to make the call right away.
And then, after that time has passed we've all had enough time to see the replay a few times and know what the call should be. So why does it take so much time to get an answer from new york after the umps put on the headphones? When those headphones go on the answer should be nearly instant.
It should. And I don't know the answer to that. But that would fall under that "they have to do something to make it work better" part I was talking about. They should be able to have the manager challenge the play, get the headphones on and make the final call within a matter of seconds. The waiting around thing is ridiculous. They're done a horrible job implementing it.
Agreed. I'd take a better replay system over no replay system. But I'd take no replay over what we have now.
Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
Thats a really silly justification.
I didnt hear you complaining when your star closer took 45 minutes between pitches. Or Wakefield. Or Beckett. Or Bucholz. Now THATS a pace problem.
There are far greater things that delay the game, and even worse, impact the pace than a couple minutes every couple of nights to get a call right.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
Thats a really silly justification.
I didnt hear you complaining when your star closer took 45 minutes between pitches. Or Wakefield. Or Beckett. Or Bucholz. Now THATS a pace problem.
There are far greater things that delay the game, and even worse, impact the pace than a couple minutes every couple of nights to get a call right.
Pitchers taking way too long between pitches is one of the biggest problems in the game, and the Red Sox are some of the worst offenders.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
Thats a really silly justification.
I didnt hear you complaining when your star closer took 45 minutes between pitches. Or Wakefield. Or Beckett. Or Bucholz. Now THATS a pace problem.
There are far greater things that delay the game, and even worse, impact the pace than a couple minutes every couple of nights to get a call right.
Pitchers taking way too long between pitches is one of the biggest problems in the game, and the Red Sox are some of the worst offenders.
No doubt. Give it time CHUDwick. I think the current system will improve quite a bit, but hopefully it is short lived in its current incarnation and gets replaced by a constantly monitored central system.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
Thats a really silly justification.
I didnt hear you complaining when your star closer took 45 minutes between pitches. Or Wakefield. Or Beckett. Or Bucholz. Now THATS a pace problem.
There are far greater things that delay the game, and even worse, impact the pace than a couple minutes every couple of nights to get a call right.
Pitchers taking way too long between pitches is one of the biggest problems in the game, and the Red Sox are some of the worst offenders.
No doubt. Give it time CHUDwick. I think the current system will improve quite a bit, but hopefully it is short lived in its current incarnation and gets replaced by a constantly monitored central system.
We don't really disagree that much, I'm just feeling impatient.
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
It's not time, it's pace. Waiting around while nothing is going on is extremely frustrating. Waiting around while you watch the manager spit at the umpire and throw second base is entertaining and doesn't make me feel like the game is dragging.
Thats a really silly justification.
I didnt hear you complaining when your star closer took 45 minutes between pitches. Or Wakefield. Or Beckett. Or Bucholz. Now THATS a pace problem.
There are far greater things that delay the game, and even worse, impact the pace than a couple minutes every couple of nights to get a call right.
Pitchers taking way too long between pitches is one of the biggest problems in the game, and the Red Sox are some of the worst offenders.
No doubt. Give it time CHUDwick. I think the current system will improve quite a bit, but hopefully it is short lived in its current incarnation and gets replaced by a constantly monitored central system.
We don't really disagree that much, I'm just feeling impatient.
I know, but when the sane folks like yourself start complaining out of impatience, it lets the crazies (HUMAN ELEMENT!) feel like they're right.
