MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
I thought it was Dice-K.
That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

David Price and Hiroki Kuroda are the slowest in the league right now at 25.8 seconds per pitch. Jake Peavy is the worst on the Red Sox at 23.7.

As usual, Mark Buehrle is the fastest at 15.8. The crazy thing is that's more than three full seconds faster than the next fastest.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: MLB

Post by EJ »

philpritchard wrote:David Price and Hiroki Kuroda are the slowest in the league right now at 25.8 seconds per pitch. Jake Peavy is the worst on the Red Sox at 23.7.

As usual, Mark Buehrle is the fastest at 15.8. The crazy thing is that's more than three full seconds faster than the next fastest.
I always thought Kuroda was really slow, but didn't realize he was the worst offender in the league. Buerhle's time management is a thing of beauty.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
I thought it was Dice-K.
That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.
:lol: I guess I hadn't considered that.

Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.

Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
I thought it was Dice-K.
That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.
:lol: I guess I hadn't considered that.

Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.

Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
Batters need to stop stepping out of the box after every pitch too.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
I thought it was Dice-K.
That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.
:lol: I guess I hadn't considered that.

Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.

Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
Batters need to stop stepping out of the box after every pitch too.
Yep. I love the way Buehrle works with batters like that. He just stands there at the ready, and it seems like he's half way through his delivery by the time the batter steps back in. He does a really good job throwing off batters' routines.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Harry Lime »

Let's sweep those Cubs, Brew Crew!
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.

Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

numbers wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.

Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.

I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

@SkitchP wrote:
numbers wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.

Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.

I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
Rarely do we disagree Skitch, but I couldnt disagree more. One of my biggest fears is that it will eventually lead to a computer calling the balls and strikes.
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: MLB

Post by Lament »

philpritchard wrote:Mark Buehrle
:heartbeat:
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: MLB

Post by @SkitchP »

numbers wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
numbers wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.

Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.

I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
Rarely do we disagree Skitch, but I couldnt disagree more. One of my biggest fears is that it will eventually lead to a computer calling the balls and strikes.
The lack of a consistent strike zone is the greatest continuous travesty in all of professional sports.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Harry Lime »

You people complain a lot.
Harry Lime
Future Drummer
Posts: 2508
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Harry Lime »

This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: MLB

Post by Thejambi »

Harry Lime wrote:This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
I don't get it, that sounds great.


Any who...those potatoes of managers need to quit dressing up in uniforms and keep there spuds in the dugout.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
MadTIGERmaN
AnalLog
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
Location: The Jungle

Re: MLB

Post by MadTIGERmaN »

Roy Oswalt vs Ben Sheets were almost always 2 hour games, now those guys DID NOT waste time
I think Sheets and Buehrle hooked up for 1 hour 50 mins once even?

Thejambi wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
I don't get it, that sounds great.
Uecker only does the radio, not the TV
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: MLB

Post by Lament »

Buehrle pitched a complete game against Seattle in early 2005 that only took 99 minutes.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 4160.shtml
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: MLB

Post by Simple Torture »

Been a couple of years since I've been to a minor league game, went last night. Definitely want to do it more. Photos under the spoiler tag.
Spoiler: show
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15605
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Simple Torture wrote:
Spoiler: show
Image

Um . . .
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22816
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: MLB

Post by Bammer »

I have Mariner tickets with my dad tomorrow and it is literally the last thing in the world that I want to do tomorrow (waste the day watching the M's that is, not spending time with pops).
(she/him/theirs)
Post Reply