That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.philpritchard wrote:I thought it was Dice-K.cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
MLB
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
David Price and Hiroki Kuroda are the slowest in the league right now at 25.8 seconds per pitch. Jake Peavy is the worst on the Red Sox at 23.7.
As usual, Mark Buehrle is the fastest at 15.8. The crazy thing is that's more than three full seconds faster than the next fastest.
As usual, Mark Buehrle is the fastest at 15.8. The crazy thing is that's more than three full seconds faster than the next fastest.
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: MLB
I always thought Kuroda was really slow, but didn't realize he was the worst offender in the league. Buerhle's time management is a thing of beauty.philpritchard wrote:David Price and Hiroki Kuroda are the slowest in the league right now at 25.8 seconds per pitch. Jake Peavy is the worst on the Red Sox at 23.7.
As usual, Mark Buehrle is the fastest at 15.8. The crazy thing is that's more than three full seconds faster than the next fastest.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
cutuphalfdead wrote:That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.philpritchard wrote:I thought it was Dice-K.cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.
Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.
Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
Batters need to stop stepping out of the box after every pitch too.philpritchard wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.philpritchard wrote:I thought it was Dice-K.cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.I guess I hadn't considered that.
Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.
Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
Yep. I love the way Buehrle works with batters like that. He just stands there at the ready, and it seems like he's half way through his delivery by the time the batter steps back in. He does a really good job throwing off batters' routines.cutuphalfdead wrote:Batters need to stop stepping out of the box after every pitch too.philpritchard wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:That wasn't just between pitch bullshit though. His games were 4 hours long because even on scoreless innings he'd face 6 batters and they'd all see a full count.philpritchard wrote:I thought it was Dice-K.cutuphalfdead wrote:I think Beckett was.I guess I hadn't considered that.
Given 100 pitches per start for 33 starts, David Price will spend approximately 9 hours and 10 minutes more on the field this year than Mark Buehrle will.
Pitchers shouldn't have to work at Mark Buehrle's pace, but that's insane.
-
Harry Lime
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Re: MLB
Let's sweep those Cubs, Brew Crew!
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: MLB
Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: MLB
numbers wrote:Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: MLB
Rarely do we disagree Skitch, but I couldnt disagree more. One of my biggest fears is that it will eventually lead to a computer calling the balls and strikes.@SkitchP wrote:numbers wrote:Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: MLB
The lack of a consistent strike zone is the greatest continuous travesty in all of professional sports.numbers wrote:Rarely do we disagree Skitch, but I couldnt disagree more. One of my biggest fears is that it will eventually lead to a computer calling the balls and strikes.@SkitchP wrote:numbers wrote:Delays aside, baseball just isnt conducive to replay. You can find something wrong with just about every bang bang play if you break it down frame by frame.@SkitchP wrote:Guys, its been a couple of weeks into a brand new system. I am sure they are aware of the flaws and a lot of them will be resolved as people become more aware of it. Additionally, the time wasted isnt really all that much worse than manager and player arguments. id say about 80 percent of the replay challanges ive seen have lasted 2 minutes or less.
Now I agree there are far better ways to do replay, and I really hope they evolve into an NHL like system. I really hate "challenge" systems because it penalizes teams for officiating mistakes, But getting rid of it because its "taking too long" is just silly.
I think its far more conducive to replay than the other sports- football its a lot harder to see whats going on in a lot of cases because of the number of bodies. NHL and NBA have to limit their replays so specifically because there are no natural stoppages after every play. Im very glad they have decided to implement a replay system in baseball, and hope it gets expanded to automated ball and strike calls in the future.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
-
Harry Lime
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Re: MLB
You people complain a lot.
-
Harry Lime
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Re: MLB
This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: MLB
I don't get it, that sounds great.Harry Lime wrote:This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
Any who...those potatoes of managers need to quit dressing up in uniforms and keep there spuds in the dugout.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
Roy Oswalt vs Ben Sheets were almost always 2 hour games, now those guys DID NOT waste time
I think Sheets and Buehrle hooked up for 1 hour 50 mins once even?
I think Sheets and Buehrle hooked up for 1 hour 50 mins once even?
Uecker only does the radio, not the TVThejambi wrote:I don't get it, that sounds great.Harry Lime wrote:This Roku box my brother purchased is amazing. I can watch the Crew & listen to Uecker at the same time.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: MLB
Buehrle pitched a complete game against Seattle in early 2005 that only took 99 minutes.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 4160.shtml
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes ... 4160.shtml
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22816
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: MLB
I have Mariner tickets with my dad tomorrow and it is literally the last thing in the world that I want to do tomorrow (waste the day watching the M's that is, not spending time with pops).
(she/him/theirs)







