*new song* I won't hold on (?)

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

*new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by stip »

http://evolutionofthemommason.blogspot. ... title.html

Debuted at solo show in Brazil 5/6/14
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by stip »

seems like a spirited performance of a pretty simple song. The climax is basically a darker version of Unthought Known
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Thejambi »

stip wrote:seems like a spirited performance of a pretty simple song. The climax is basically a darker version of Unthought Known
Has the feel of the old solo Ed I used to enjoy so much.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by McParadigm »

The climax is basically a darker version of Unthought Known
By which you mean a series of almost literally identical vocal melodies, just sung over a more minor key progression.

That said, one can immediately recognize the start of something decent, and just as quickly imagine all the ways the band will turn it into not that.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10760
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by CopperTom »

I give that Backspacer B side 1 star.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Heathen »

CopperTom wrote:I give that Backspacer B side 1 star.
I take it it's the best thing to come out of the BS sessions?
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10760
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by CopperTom »

Heathen wrote:
CopperTom wrote:I give that Backspacer B side 1 star.
I take it it's the best thing to come out of the BS sessions?
Very likely.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by bodysnatcher »

something about this song seems personal to him. he sings it with more conviction than anything on the last two albums
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by McParadigm »

bodysnatcher wrote:something about this song seems personal to him. he sings it with more conviction than anything on the last two albums
fewer show-off affectations

But it seriously is Unthought Known for just an incredibly long time.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Thejambi »

For sure, but i find it much more compelling than UK.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by bodysnatcher »

i'm just pumped he broke out something that's being worked out and/or new. i remember those days.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by McParadigm »

bodysnatcher wrote:i'm just pumped he broke out something that's being worked out and/or new. i remember those days.
Ahh, the days of taking chances...

(patriotic choking noises)
Tuolumne
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Tuolumne »

McParadigm wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:i'm just pumped he broke out something that's being worked out and/or new. i remember those days.
Ahh, the days of taking chances...


I think releasing Fixer as a single and coming out with an album like Backspacer was a pretty big chance, just one some people might not have liked, which is the whole nature of chances.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by digster »

I'm not really sure what taking chances would mean with Pearl Jam at this point. It's hard to take chances when there really isn't the chance of anything bad happening. All their hardcore fans are going to pick up their records no matter what, it seems at this point. Even if they don't hit the radio, they're never going to go hungry. But I guess that's another story.

As for this song, eh. Maybe it's just that Ed's folky stuff doesn't do it for me as much anymore. It's really hard to make the same four chords played over and over again compelling in a solo performance. That being said, like something like Loud Uke, it could end up being something promising down the line.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by McParadigm »

Tuolumne wrote:I think releasing Fixer as a single and coming out with an album like Backspacer was a pretty big chance, just one some people might not have liked, which is the whole nature of chances.
I actually agree with you on that. Backspacer is a record with distinct personality and intention, and as such it carries with it an element of genuine risk. Whether or not it's the type of risk the fanbase wanted, well...you know. But there's no avoiding that it was a more targeted work (hahahahaha) that actually wanted to be something new. It also sounds very organic in retrospect, when compared to the choked off, tightly controlled production we're hearing now.

Lightning Bolt is more like a far more conservative version of what self-titled was....a record that tries to protect itself against failure by mimicking every little something that it thinks you liked about the past. Rock dude stuff? We got it. Backspacer pop? The moody blues? Introspective acoustic? We've got that, too. And it's all priced to move. Please like us. Pretty please. Oh, god.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Thejambi »

Image
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36491
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Jorge »

man this is awful
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Heathen »

Trying to be more catchy/accessible/dumbed down is pretty much the opposite of taking chances.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by McParadigm »

everyone's a critic looking back up the

uh

r

radar?

is it river?

it's radar or river.

both sound really stupid.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: *new song* I won't hold on (?)

Post by Thejambi »

Image
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
Post Reply