What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Norah »

Aye Davanita is definitely not too long.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Norah »

Yeah, what Jorge said.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36750
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Jorge »

You need to stop parroting me.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Norah »

You need to stop saying things I'd say.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35415
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Strat »

most chud post of all time
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by surfndestroy »

Not For You is a minute and a half to two minutes too long. There's not enough going on in the song to warrant a nearly six minute song.

Bugs and Aya Davanita are too long. At nearly three minutes long the crossover from being musical to full fledged songs. As full fledged songs they are both out of place on this album and just not that good.

Betterman should have been the closer on Vs. with a toughened up Hard To Imagine taking its place on Vitalogy. Indifference not seeing the light of day until Lost Dogs would have been an okay thing.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37452
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Norah »

Anyone who thinks Aye Davanita just isn't that good can go suck a bag of dicks.
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by surfndestroy »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Anyone who thinks Aye Davanita just isn't that good can go suck a bag of dicks.
It's nearly summer. At least make it a banana popsicle.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22295
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by bodysnatcher »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Anyone who thinks Aye Davanita just isn't that good can go suck a bag of dicks.
yup
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22295
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by bodysnatcher »

McP already said it. Nothingman is the weakest link on this album. I like the song, don't gimme wrong. It's just oddly out of place.

Seems like I remember reading (years ago) that Ed and Jeff got in a basketball one-on-one match trying to decide if Nothingman or a different song would be on the album? Anyone know of that? Or know what the other song was?
User avatar
Alex
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5740
Joined: Fri August 16, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Alex »

the "one day she stiffened, took the other side" line sounds like a bad eddie vedder impersonator
Malloy wrote:making this place inhospitable to posting is really the only move left.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36750
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Jorge »

Alex wrote:the "one day she stiffened, took the other side" line sounds like a bad eddie vedder impersonator
you mean like
Last edited by Jorge on Mon May 19, 2014 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Kaius »

theplatypus wrote:Aye Davanita is not long enough.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by stip »

surfndestroy wrote:
Not For You is a minute and a half to two minutes too long. There's just not enough musical ideas to warrant a six minute song.
I agree it's a bit too long
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by stip »

Heathen wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
Heathen wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I think the "weirdness" of Vitalogy is somewhat overstated.
For all the talk of how the band was trying too hard to sound weird on the middle period albums, I think Vitalogy is the weirdest this band ever got. There hasn't been anything as "out there" as Stupid Mop since.
I would still say he's right, though--it's not an apt descriptor for the album as a whole, only for a few deliberately offbeat tracks that seem to shoulder a disproportionate percentage of the album's reputation.
Oh, sure. It's more a comment on how little sense it makes when people who have Vitalogy as one of their all-time favorite albums see the middle period albums as too experimental/difficult.

The key distinction between the two eras is not really one being more weird or experimental than the other as much as it is the presentation of the songs. I think it makes more sense to emphasize the inward or outward energy of the songs. At any rate, Vitalogy really bridges those two periods, and I imagine most people who are not in love with that middle run of records are probably not especially enamored with the 'experimental' tracks on vitalogy
jtmack20
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed July 24, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by jtmack20 »

not many. I think better studio versions of Satans bed and Immortality were possible. The album version of Immortality is not as epic as it could have been. I think the self pollution radio version gets closer to what it could have been. I think the "filler" tracks actually fit the album pretty well, and tie everything together.
User avatar
mray10
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:54 pm

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by mray10 »

stip wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
Not For You is a minute and a half to two minutes too long. There's just not enough musical ideas to warrant a six minute song.
I agree it's a bit too long
No.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46228
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by BurtReynolds »

3 minutes is too long? The thirteen minute ambient/drone/stoner epics i listen to put Aye Davinita to shame. Make it fifteen minutes long and we'll talk about too long.

You fucking guys....
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Got Some
Future Drummer
Posts: 2000
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:39 am

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Got Some »

Album should of started with Pry to

And ended with Immortality.


That's about it!!!
Release_Me
AnalLog
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 10:01 am

Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: Vitalogy

Post by Release_Me »

stip wrote:
Heathen wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
Heathen wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I think the "weirdness" of Vitalogy is somewhat overstated.
For all the talk of how the band was trying too hard to sound weird on the middle period albums, I think Vitalogy is the weirdest this band ever got. There hasn't been anything as "out there" as Stupid Mop since.
I would still say he's right, though--it's not an apt descriptor for the album as a whole, only for a few deliberately offbeat tracks that seem to shoulder a disproportionate percentage of the album's reputation.
Oh, sure. It's more a comment on how little sense it makes when people who have Vitalogy as one of their all-time favorite albums see the middle period albums as too experimental/difficult.

The key distinction between the two eras is not really one being more weird or experimental than the other as much as it is the presentation of the songs. I think it makes more sense to emphasize the inward or outward energy of the songs. At any rate, Vitalogy really bridges those two periods, and I imagine most people who are not in love with that middle run of records are probably not especially enamored with the 'experimental' tracks on vitalogy
This. The actual songs on Vitalogy are great. I could do without the weird/experimental tracks which I still mostly ignore. They don't add anything to my experience of listening to the album. I still resent the fact that they tried to sabotage their best ever work by including these songs but that was their thing in 94.
Pearl Jam is the only band I'll spend money on.
Post Reply