Backspacer: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Everyone loves Backspacer, but how much?

5 Stars:
6
4%
4 Stars:
31
19%
3 Stars:
78
47%
2 Stars:
30
18%
1 Star:
20
12%
 
Total votes: 165

User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

McParadigm wrote:Lightning Bolting
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

mastaflatch wrote:
stip wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:
stip wrote:
mastaflatch wrote:also, there's got to be a major difference between a ramshackle 60s cover that was recorded live on a soundcheck then released as a fan club single then off to the airwaves and became a hit by popular demand then put on a benefit album for Kosovar refugees and a song that uses the very musical stereotypes and idiosycrasies that PJ tried to shack off for most of their career. those hair metal mannerisms were what the Seattle scene stood against in the beginning and that stance surely appealed to me.

i'm not going to diss the song's lyrics or overall musical performance of the band but it's a clear and conscious choice from this band and BO'B and it's some kind of artistic u-turn that can't go unnoticed.
It's a song that probably wouldn't have appeared on earlier records, although pj deteactors in the early years considered pj one small remove from hair metal anyway.

My larger point was that I see no reason to think that the existence of stuff like red dot, soon forget, or wasted reprise were somehow keeping songs like sirens off the record, or that they are incompatible
i get what you're saying and you may be right. that being said, Ed claimed, when promoting LB and to ackowledge the corporate rock/hair metal roots of Sirens, that they'd stop caring what Mark Arm thought about their songs. so there's that stance that may (or may not) signify that current PJ doesn't care either about what they used to be. there's got to be something to think about when the band you used to love is now recording a power-ballad single that the singer can barely handle live just weeks after its release.
I think the fact that they aren't letting their sound be determined by what some random guy thinks is cool is great. They've been out of high school for a long time. What that has to do with whether or not Eddie can handle a song live don't know.
releasing their most commercial song yet, that's a huge departure - or a stylistic regression? - as a single that their frontman can't convincingly reproduce live speaks volumes as to where the band is, the importance they put in being a great band. i don't think there was this kind of occurences (downtuning newly-released songs) before Backspacer. now it's almost like it's their modus operandi.
So Eddie can't nail a song or things are downtuned because they are lazy or because it's part of the PRAMG or both?

There are two seperate things going on here. Eddies more limited capacity as a vocalist and writing songs that mark arm won't like. I wouldn't conflate them
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

The Fixer live is pretty cool, specially if you are there. Its really fun.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Sirens was great in NYC 2
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by digster »

There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to write radio hits provided you can do it well. Pearl Jam haven't really offered much evidence that they can do it well. I don't really care what their motivation is, whether it's writing songs to hit the charts or make Mark Arm happy, provided the end result is something worthwhile.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Heathen »

Aren't trying a really shitty thing and lightning bolting basically the same thing?
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Heathen »

Lament wrote:I don't think the songs are very good. And I don't really buy the idea that it's a different approach, or that they're breaking new ground or experimenting or anything like that. It's a rock album made by a rock band with songs that I don't enjoy (except for Got Some).
This is the closest we'll ever come to sucking each other's cock.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Lament »

Heathen wrote:This is the closest we'll ever come to sucking each other's cock.
:naughty:
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

digster wrote:There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to write radio hits provided you can do it well. Pearl Jam haven't really offered much evidence that they can do it well. I don't really care what their motivation is, whether it's writing songs to hit the charts or make Mark Arm happy, provided the end result is something worthwhile.
Well, they have managed to score some pretty big radio hits. Isn't that evidence?
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by hlniv »

VinylGuy wrote:I still dont get the hatred Backspacer gets. Maybe because of the fixer video or the Target thing? Because even if you dont like it musically or lyrically, it was a very different approach for the band.

And yes, they gained a lot of new fans with this one.
There have been many explanations of the commonly held low opinion of this album throughout this thread, i.e. my post on page 16 for one. I think the reasoning behind these opinions is pretty well communicated. Of course, there are some who disagree, but its pretty hard to justify saying that you don't get why people don't like it. It's been discussed ad nauseam.

I still vehemently disagree with the opinion that they "gained a lot of new fans with this one". I'm sure some people who hadn't liked Pearl Jam prior did enjoy the album, but I'm willing to wager vast sums of money that there were more who owned their prior albums, and wrote them off after this album. My estimate (based on zero quantifiable data, granted) is that the net result is negative fan flow.

Of course, were there some new folks who liked Just Breathe? - yes. My admin assistant (31 years old - smoking hot) is one. But she still ain't no PJ fan.
User avatar
hlniv
Future Drummer
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by hlniv »

VinylGuy wrote:The Fixer live is pretty cool, specially if you are there. Its really fun.
Uggh....

I bet Miley Cyrus is pretty "fun" live, too
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Jorge »

stip wrote:
digster wrote:There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to write radio hits provided you can do it well. Pearl Jam haven't really offered much evidence that they can do it well. I don't really care what their motivation is, whether it's writing songs to hit the charts or make Mark Arm happy, provided the end result is something worthwhile.
Well, they have managed to score some pretty big radio hits. Isn't that evidence?
Yeah, I don't know if those are the words I would've used, considering the first half of their career is chock-full of radio hits. I think it's more about the type of pop songwriting they've been attempting.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by digster »

stip wrote:
digster wrote:There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to write radio hits provided you can do it well. Pearl Jam haven't really offered much evidence that they can do it well. I don't really care what their motivation is, whether it's writing songs to hit the charts or make Mark Arm happy, provided the end result is something worthwhile.
Well, they have managed to score some pretty big radio hits. Isn't that evidence?
I meant write good songs when trying to write radio hits. I wasn't meaning to bring up chart positions or anything.
Tuolumne
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:13 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Tuolumne »

This could be generalizing, but some of the Backspacer criticism seems to be "it's not what I expect of them" or "it's not what they do best", which is ironic from those that adore Vitalogy and No Code (of which I am one) when that was all we heard from the Ten lovers at the time.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

digster wrote:
stip wrote:
digster wrote:There's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to write radio hits provided you can do it well. Pearl Jam haven't really offered much evidence that they can do it well. I don't really care what their motivation is, whether it's writing songs to hit the charts or make Mark Arm happy, provided the end result is something worthwhile.
Well, they have managed to score some pretty big radio hits. Isn't that evidence?
I meant write good songs when trying to write radio hits. I wasn't meaning to bring up chart positions or anything.
I realized that after I replied.

But I think sirens, fixer, and just breathe are all good songs. Not all time classics, but good. I enjoy all 3. For a long time I would have come close to calling fixer a top song, but not anymore
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

McParadigm wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Backspacer is Pearl Jam with a tan, and a shitty goatee, and frosted tips.
Which is still better than Pearl Jam pulling its wagon into town and going "Whatever it was you liked, we can still do that! Really! I swear! Mid-90's crunch? Anthemic balladry? Wave-like structures that build and then restart? Meandering mood pieces with cryptic lyrics? Oh god please still like us because we can almost write songs that remind you of way better songs from before..."

Give me Pearl Jam trying a really shitty thing over Pearl Jam Lightning Bolting all over any day of the week.
So this template was okay for ten, and vs, and vitalogy, and no code, and yield, and probably binaural, and riot act, and s/t, and backspacer, but now it's suddenly a problem at the level of formula, as opposed to execution?
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by Lament »

99% of everything in this world is in the execution, c'mon now.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Look, all I'm saying is that every Pearl Jam album is largely structured the same way, with the same types of songs. This may be a valid critique, but given how it applies to every stage of a 20+ year career it seems like something of an odd charge to level exclusively at lightning bolt.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

For instance, if you think the bright immediacy and a sensibility that is pushing the songs towards accessibility and familiarity is a problem with Lightning Bolt that makes sense. It's a critique that is actually leveled at the album--rather than being shocked and mildly outraged by the fact that pearl jam made a pearl jam record.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Backspacer: Official Album Thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

it's kinda like making a portrait in Photoshop versus an oil painting.
Post Reply