Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by liebzz »

I listened to Side A of No Code last night because that was all I had time for and I've been following this discussion. I really really love Side A maybe more than any Side A ever. The Sometimes-->Hail Hail has been discussed, but In My Tree-->Smile might be my favorite 1-2 punch in all of the albums.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by EJ »

After reading this thread, I've been listening to the album quite a bit. And, I'm addicted to Hail, Hail right now.
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

The sometimes--hail hail jump wouldn't bother me as much if a different song followed hail hail
"The progression from "Hail Hail" to "Who You Are" works because of how "Hail Hail" ends"
Yeah, I have no problem with that transition. Again, my issue with all this is that I think there is no need to destroy the mood created by sometimes
1. Sometimes - Hail Hail transition wouldn't bother you if a different song followed Hail Hail
2. There is no issue with the transition from Hail Hail to Who You Are
3. The main issue is with the transition between Sometimes and Hail Hail

I'm confused - can you explain how those three statements can co-exist?
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by Norah »

stip wrote:(although how often do they do long road--breakerfall--hard to imagine).
pretty sure they've never done that
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by liebzz »

In cross examination, this is referred to impeaching the witness. :-)
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by Jorge »

LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by elliseamos »

theplatypus wrote:LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
I say we scalp'em, then we tattoo'em, then we hang'em, then we fuck'em in the ass!!
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by McParadigm »

elliseamos wrote:
theplatypus wrote:LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
I say we scalp'em, then we tattoo'em, then we hang'em, then we fuck'em in the ass!!
Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by elliseamos »

McParadigm wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
theplatypus wrote:LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
I say we scalp'em, then we tattoo'em, then we hang'em, then we fuck'em in the ass!!
Image
yup, that was my joke. thanks for helping.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by McParadigm »

elliseamos wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
theplatypus wrote:LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
I say we scalp'em, then we tattoo'em, then we hang'em, then we fuck'em in the ass!!
Image
yup, that was my joke. thanks for helping.
Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by elliseamos »

McParadigm wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
elliseamos wrote:
theplatypus wrote:LET'S FUCK STIP('s opinions) IN THE ASS
I say we scalp'em, then we tattoo'em, then we hang'em, then we fuck'em in the ass!!
Image
yup, that was my joke. thanks for helping.
Image
Image
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by stip »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
The sometimes--hail hail jump wouldn't bother me as much if a different song followed hail hail
"The progression from "Hail Hail" to "Who You Are" works because of how "Hail Hail" ends"
Yeah, I have no problem with that transition. Again, my issue with all this is that I think there is no need to destroy the mood created by sometimes
1. Sometimes - Hail Hail transition wouldn't bother you if a different song followed Hail Hail
2. There is no issue with the transition from Hail Hail to Who You Are
3. The main issue is with the transition between Sometimes and Hail Hail

I'm confused - can you explain how those three statements can co-exist?


Probably.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by stip »

my issue is that I think the hail hail transition destroys the mood that (I think) they are trying to create on the a-side.
1. Sometimes - Hail Hail transition wouldn't bother you if a different song followed Hail Hail
2. There is no issue with the transition from Hail Hail to Who You Are
3. The main issue is with the transition between Sometimes and Hail Hail
1. If they were not necessarily going right back to the run of contemplative songs, so HH didn't feel like a disruptive blip, I probably wouldn't mind that much (I don't like it, but my only issue is that I don't like the transition--it does not interfere with the larger record)

2. No, as far as a transition goes that is fine. the damage is done at the start of the song. the transition into Who You Are is okay, but it still feels like I'm starting over on the album--that sometimes becomes irrelevant. the problem is that Who You Are being there makes me think that sometimes was supposed to matter and that hail hail is in the way. That's a sequencing issue for me perhaps (if you take HH as something that has to be there and will sound this way regardless) but not a transition issue.

3. Yes
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1512
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by Hatfield »

EJ wrote:After reading this thread, I've been listening to the album quite a bit. And, I'm addicted to Hail, Hail right now.
Is Stone using a slide on the guitar? This might be my favorite rhythm guitar on a Pearl jam record.

No Code is such a thick sounding album. The depth that BoB was able to capture in the studio is one of the aspects I enjoy most about that record. Hail, Hail on Binaural wouldn't sound half as good (see Greivance).
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by digster »

Stip, I think I've mentioned this before, but I think it's still a stretch just because I'm not really sure how Sometimes and Who You Are are operating on the same plane....maybe lyrically but there's a pretty fair gulf between them sonically and in terms of atmosphere. I really don't see how the two songs following Hail Hail are just a re-do of Sometimes. Really, I think the parts that feel the most like Sometimes come later in the record (Present Tense, I'm Open). Not so much Who You Are or In My Tree.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by digster »

stip wrote:oh come on. A live show and an album are very different. I'm not saying that this had to be a reason, but the fact that live shows follow a similar pattern isn't relevant (although how often do they do long road--breakerfall--hard to imagine).
I think you're going further with that statement than it was intended...it was merely to say that the notion of a soft song followed by a barnburner was not something that struck the band as something they would never do. I wasn't saying they were trying to 'recreate' the feel of a live show.
Last edited by digster on Wed March 20, 2013 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Look for the next thread of this series tomorrow. .......

This time frame was a hot topic on the board which is why I waited a bit
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by stip »

digster wrote:Stip, I think I've mentioned this before, but I think it's still a stretch just because I'm not really sure how Sometimes and Who You Are are operating on the same plane....maybe lyrically but there's a pretty fair gulf between them sonically and in terms of atmosphere. I really don't see how the two songs following Hail Hail are just a re-do of Sometimes. Really, I think the parts that feel the most like Sometimes come later in the record (Present Tense, I'm Open). Not so much Who You Are or In My Tree.
that's true, but I feel like there is n atmospheric progression that would be happening without hail hail (as existing) there
User avatar
mray10
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:54 pm

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by mray10 »

I guess I'm sort of on Stip's side here, but I honestly can't really follow on the arguments he's making. For me, it's just an aesthetic thing I don't like. Hail Hail just feels out of place as the only really aggressive, loud song in that initial run.

That said, the "original tracklist" had the same kind of thing going on except it was Habit in that spot instead of Hail Hail. This lends some credence anyway to the argument that they wanted a jarring transition, sonically. But buy would that have been worse. At least now the first five songs on the album are all very good songs, in my opinion, even if they don't flow especially well. Habit really wouldn't have worked there for me.

Someone also suggested earlier, and maybe rightly so, that some of this might just be the product of how Stip (and I) feels about the album as a whole. For me, because there are quite a few clunky spots on the record, it's harder to agree with an argument that this beginning is the start of a magical journey. For me, it's not. The first five songs on the record are five of the better songs that made the cut, but I've always had a such a general lack of affection for Off He Goes, Habit, Lukin, and Mankind that the album has never been one that I can look at fairly as a complete entity.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Era of the moment: 1995-1996

Post by McParadigm »

Why do I solve this shit if you people are just gonna go on and on and on like nothing has happened?

It's like Binaural all over again.
(patriotic choking noises)
Post Reply