Guardians of the Galaxy

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Mecca »

this movie is taking forever. I could've watched it with anticipation a month after the trailer with Hooked On a Feeling came out, but now I just kinda want to see it.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by stip »

new trailer



and this little bit, which is a little risque for a disney film
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Jorge »

This is as much of a Disney film as Pulp Fiction was
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by stip »

theplatypus wrote:This is as much of a Disney film as Pulp Fiction was
I assume the possible theme park integration and merchandising opportunities associated with marvel (and the film grosses) puts them under a stricter degree of scrutiny
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Mecca »

stip wrote:
theplatypus wrote:This is as much of a Disney film as Pulp Fiction was
I assume the possible theme park integration and merchandising opportunities associated with marvel (and the film grosses) puts them under a stricter degree of scrutiny
this film would have to be a success for that to happen, but I doubt it will be a success relative to the budget and marketing
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by stip »

True, but I assume they assume it will be
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by McParadigm »

Whoever brought Hooked on a Feeling in and said "I've got an idea" is solely responsible for the one bit of personality this film actually has.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by stip »

I thin that's a gimmick from the comics but I could be wrong. I've never read them
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7307
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Peeps »

stip wrote:I thin that's a gimmick from the comics but I could be wrong. I've never read them

in the comics they are the 2nd or 3rd incarnation of the team name (depending on how you look at it). i just started reading this group and the movie seems to have a grasp of the comic pretty firmly. starlord is from earth but his father rules a separate galactic empire and has forbid his son from going back to earth. (not sure the exact nature of the films plot) and how close it will follow but the characters from what i have seen seem spot on.
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by bune »

Having powered through the comics, it's is close enough to annoy at the changes they're making. The team changes but it also has some key members that stay the same; some of those key members are not in this film. There are other things like who the bad guy usually is but I'm not going into that one at it's spoilers for the film.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by McParadigm »

Why would you ever want a movie to mimic the source material it draws upon? I've never understood that. You're talking about transitioning a story into a completely different medium...one that has completely different abilities and limitations. Besides, a movie inspired by a book or a comic has the potential to reinvent and to reimagine the known. It has the ability to do something other than just give you things you already know.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Jorge »

McParadigm wrote:Why would you ever want a movie to mimic the source material it draws upon? I've never understood that. You're talking about transitioning a story into a completely different medium...one that has completely different abilities and limitations. Besides, a movie inspired by a book or a comic has the potential to reinvent and to reimagine the known. It has the ability to do something other than just give you things you already know.
Yes, and this is the main reason why the Watchmen movie failed so hard
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by @SkitchP »

theplatypus wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Why would you ever want a movie to mimic the source material it draws upon? I've never understood that. You're talking about transitioning a story into a completely different medium...one that has completely different abilities and limitations. Besides, a movie inspired by a book or a comic has the potential to reinvent and to reimagine the known. It has the ability to do something other than just give you things you already know.
Yes, and this is the main reason why the Watchmen movie failed so hard

You think so? I think it has a lot more to do with the fact none of the general masses (myself included) had any idea who ANY of the heroes were.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Jorge »

No, that's not it. None of the masses knew who any of the heroes were when the comics came out, either, and it's one of the most massively acclaimed comic book series of all time.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by Jorge »

But when I say "failed" I don't mean in a commercial sense, I mean artistically. It tried to do a super faithful adaptation of a comic that was revolutionary because of how subversive it was within its own medium. You lose a lot of that when you do a straight translation to the silver screen.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

theplatypus wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Why would you ever want a movie to mimic the source material it draws upon? I've never understood that. You're talking about transitioning a story into a completely different medium...one that has completely different abilities and limitations. Besides, a movie inspired by a book or a comic has the potential to reinvent and to reimagine the known. It has the ability to do something other than just give you things you already know.
Yes, and this is the main reason why the Watchmen movie failed so hard
And why Fight Club is such a brilliant film.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by bada »

I thought the Watchman movie was ok but I was never over the moon for the source material either. Like the movie I thought it was ok.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:I thought the Watchman movie was ok but I was never over the moon for the source material either. Like the movie I thought it was ok.
I'm kinda with you. I liked the novel, but I also read it later in my life than so many others that I know. I "get" it, but I was underwhelmed. The movie was fine. I liked it more than I expected to. It just felt a little soulless.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by McParadigm »

It just felt a little soulless.
I agree with this, except that I'd argue that the performances were generally very good. The actors had heart and soul, but they were contained within this entity that just couldn't care less.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

Post by stip »

durdencommatyler wrote:
bada wrote:I thought the Watchman movie was ok but I was never over the moon for the source material either. Like the movie I thought it was ok.
I'm kinda with you. I liked the novel, but I also read it later in my life than so many others that I know. I "get" it, but I was underwhelmed. The movie was fine. I liked it more than I expected to. It just felt a little soulless.
Post Reply