Oh, you were there. That explains it. 18 songs is the length of the main set typically. Generally speaking, all things being equal with the main set, a concert with a great encore is better than a concert with an average encore which is better than a concert with a bad encoRe which is better than concert with no encore. That show had no encore. Your suggestion is very odd. That's all.VinylGuy wrote:Yeah both nights were awesome. But i think its night one..with Life Wasted....that super duper good. Who cares about the 20 songs?CopperTom wrote:St. Paul 06? Are you serious? They were the opening act and played fewer than 20 songs. There's probably 50 better shows from the 2006 tour alone.VinylGuy wrote:Toronto 05 is unreal.Farmer John wrote:Anything Toronto.BigRedLedbetter wrote:What is everyone's opinion on some more underrated/overlooked/not talked about shows?
St Paul 06 and ACL 09 are great.
Which bootleg are you listening to?
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I'm willing to wager he wasn't.CopperTom wrote:Oh, you were there. That explains it.
I think your metric is a little odd: does anyone actually sit down and listen to 2.5/3 hours of a Pearl Jam show for pleasure? I sure as hell don't and I've listened to tons of live Pearl Jam shows; what's enjoyable in person definitely isn't what makes for a perfect listening experience after the fact. That St Paul show, discussion of quality aside, is the perfect length for me.CopperTom wrote:Generally speaking, all things being equal with the main set, a concert with a great encore is better than a concert with an average encore which is better than a concert with a bad encoRe which is better than concert with no encore. That show had no encore. Your suggestion is very odd. That's all.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
If it's not a show you attended, the quality of the performance is all that matters. The length of the show and the songs played are pretty irrelevant.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I swear if I said water was wet, you would somehow disagree. I phrased my metric in such a way where it is nearly irrefutable. But to you it doesn't make sense. This was a concert without an encore. This was a concert where PJ was the opening act. Maybe you should stop listening to concerts after the main set then. How many people would choose a one hour PJ concert to a 2 or 3 hour concert? Do you think any of these 6 opening act shows are in the Top 10 2006 shows? Top 25? Top 50? I know you don't think it's better than any of the Australian shows.Birds in Hell wrote:I think your metric is a little odd: does anyone actually sit down and listen to 2.5/3 hours of a Pearl Jam show for pleasure? I sure as hell don't and I've listened to tons of live Pearl Jam shows; what's enjoyable in person definitely isn't what makes for a perfect listening experience after the fact. That St Paul show, discussion of quality aside, is the perfect length for me.CopperTom wrote:Generally speaking, all things being equal with the main set, a concert with a great encore is better than a concert with an average encore which is better than a concert with a bad encoRe which is better than concert with no encore. That show had no encore. Your suggestion is very odd. That's all.
I realize everyone has their opinion and best is subjective, but the guy asked for underrated or under the radar shows - this is neither. This show is an afterthought for a reason.
If you listen to PJ concerts for any reason other than pleasure, you're doing it wrong.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I think those are pretty important details. Everyone here is a fan, not a critic. I, for one, would rather hear average performances of songs I like rather than great performances of songs I don't like.numbers wrote:If it's not a show you attended, the quality of the performance is all that matters. The length of the show and the songs played are pretty irrelevant.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
To listen to, definitely the former; to attend, the latter.CopperTom wrote:How many people would choose a one hour PJ concert to a 2 or 3 hour concert?
That isn't difficult to understand, surely?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Cork, ireland 96 is one of the weirder boots you'll hear.
Vastly underrated (yes I was there, my first show in fact)
But it's still awesome
Vastly underrated (yes I was there, my first show in fact)
But it's still awesome
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
So much bickering. I think you're all pretty.
Agreed with the Fresno 2000 show. Footsteps late in the show I can dig it.
Agreed with the Fresno 2000 show. Footsteps late in the show I can dig it.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Yeah, but were all PJ fanatics here, how many songs are there that we legitimately don't like. My list is probably under 15.CopperTom wrote:I think those are pretty important details. Everyone here is a fan, not a critic. I, for one, would rather hear average performances of songs I like rather than great performances of songs I don't like.numbers wrote:If it's not a show you attended, the quality of the performance is all that matters. The length of the show and the songs played are pretty irrelevant.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I hear you. Very few I truly dislike. Maybe I should have said songs I "prefer." For example, I would prefer to hear Breath rather than SoLaT each time, every time. Animal to Go. Hail Hail to Last Exit.numbers wrote:Yeah, but were all PJ fanatics here, how many songs are there that we legitimately don't like. My list is probably under 15.CopperTom wrote:I think those are pretty important details. Everyone here is a fan, not a critic. I, for one, would rather hear average performances of songs I like rather than great performances of songs I don't like.numbers wrote:If it's not a show you attended, the quality of the performance is all that matters. The length of the show and the songs played are pretty irrelevant.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- Leatherhead
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
The length of a show is irrelevant when listening to the bootleg. I can't remember the last time I listened to an entire show all the way through in one session.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
- ridleybradout
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
- Location: Rand McNally
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
"We'll never not play Boise again"numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.

- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I'm blown away by this show as well. Have listened to a lot of 2000 boots the last few weeks and this one is my favorite. Las Vegas is great too and I'm digging Albuquerque too.numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Albuquerque is incredible.BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm blown away by this show as well. Have listened to a lot of 2000 boots the last few weeks and this one is my favorite. Las Vegas is great too and I'm digging Albuquerque too.numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Vegas was one of my favs.Birds in Hell wrote:Albuquerque is incredible.BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm blown away by this show as well. Have listened to a lot of 2000 boots the last few weeks and this one is my favorite. Las Vegas is great too and I'm digging Albuquerque too.numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
I just recently bought the touring band dvd (not sure how I went so long without seeing it but it was like $5 on amazon) and so I was intrigued about the Albuquerque show. So good.Birds in Hell wrote:Albuquerque is incredible.BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm blown away by this show as well. Have listened to a lot of 2000 boots the last few weeks and this one is my favorite. Las Vegas is great too and I'm digging Albuquerque too.numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- BigRedLedbetter
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Sat June 07, 2014 5:38 pm
- Location: The town of Lincoln, Nebraska
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
CopperTom wrote:Vegas was one of my favs.Birds in Hell wrote:Albuquerque is incredible.BigRedLedbetter wrote:I'm blown away by this show as well. Have listened to a lot of 2000 boots the last few weeks and this one is my favorite. Las Vegas is great too and I'm digging Albuquerque too.numbers wrote:Man, Boise 2000 is so fucking good. This might be my favorite show of all time.
ALL the feels when they played Crown of Thorns. That performance gives me goosebumps. Emotional as hell.
"My balls feels like they're in a French press." ~ bodysnatcher
- Angus
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:18 pm
- Location: Alone in a corridor
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Really? Was there and wouldn't even rank it in my top-10 shows. Maybe that's just because it was following Ottawa (amongst others).VinylGuy wrote: Toronto 05 is unreal.
As far as Boise 2000 goes: I wouldn't even call it underrated anymore. I mean, everyone loves it, right?
I agree with some other 2000 shows (Fresno, Toronto).
I'll add Champaign 03, some Japan 03 shows, Montreal 98
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10821
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: What bootleg are you listening to?
Ditto. I love that Ottawa show. It might my #1 attended show. Toronto was the only show that I was sick at. It took some of the enjoyment out of it. However, it's only true deficiency, in my opinion, is on-stage guests. It was memorable but unnecessary. The only guest stars I enjoy are anyone for Hunger Strike or Ben Harper.Angus wrote:Really? Was there and wouldn't even rank it in my top-10 shows. Maybe that's just because it was following Ottawa (amongst others).VinylGuy wrote: Toronto 05 is unreal.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.