I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Post Reply
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by zeb »

It's just a feeling I have.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by Jorge »

Actual album length notwithstanding?
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by liebzz »

I think it greatly depends on the artist. To me, an optimal length for a Pearl Jam album falls somewhere in the 50-minute 12-14 song set because it seems to be the right amount of space for them to take you on their journey - at least from what we've gotten from them so far. I would put Springsteen in the same category since everything he has done that was longer eventually blended together.

I feel a band like Radiohead would do well to shorten their albums into the 30-or so minute mark - 7-10 tracks. This is mostly because after about a half hour, their music starts to grate at me - especially everything post Kid A. Actually, I think Danger Mouse has perfected the flow of albums around this length and track listing (See Beck's Modern Guilt, The Black Keys' El Camino and Attack & Release).

Then there are bands like Pink Floyd, the Beatles and the Who who have successfully held my attention for longer. Actually, I do also really love the concept of the double album - I've always held that epic 70s excessiveness in high regard. Too bad bands like Journey, Kansas, and Boston just don't do it for me. I do enjoy the double albums from RHCP, Smashing Pumpkins, and the bands mentioned above though.
pjpjpaul
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 3:28 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by pjpjpaul »

I agree 12 is optimal.... But exceptions are acceptable sometimes... When punk bands have 45 second songs I cut them slack if the albums has a lot of songs... And if its a band with longer, more thematic songs, I cut them slack for having less songs.. But I have always liked the 12 track album for some reason...
intodeep
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon January 07, 2013 1:03 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by intodeep »

10 -12 is about right with me too.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by Heathen »

no
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by EJ »

Yield is 13 tracks. So, this.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by bada »

10
User avatar
j's brain
A Return To Form
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:20 pm
Location: Earth

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by j's brain »

40-45 minutes.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84845
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by epilogue »

theplatypus wrote:Actual album length notwithstanding?
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by zeb »

durdencommatyler wrote:
theplatypus wrote:Actual album length notwithstanding?
I think so.
User avatar
kreng
AnalLog
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:53 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by kreng »

Heathen wrote:no
User avatar
Soma.
AnalLog
Posts: 1362
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:17 pm
Location: On a live wire right up off the street.

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by Soma. »

Oh zeb, we need a song tourney to keep you from saying such silly things.
Self wrote:Every time I get to be a bachelor, I order Chinese. Twice a year, I gorge on broccoli 'n beef and crab rangoons. The guilt reminds me of masturbation. So does the rice.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by McParadigm »

This idea is the Special Ed of album creation.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by verb_to_trust »

bada wrote:10

Nothing better than a really solid 10 track album. All killer, no filler.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
bart
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue January 08, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by bart »

verb_to_trust wrote:
bada wrote:10

Nothing better than a really solid 10 track album. All killer, no filler.
Reign in Blood.
User avatar
Will
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by Will »

Whenever I piece together my own ideas, I always separate things into a dozen tracks for an album. Good call, zeb.
I might be able to get to an E-bow.
User avatar
zeb
$5 Donation Gets Custom Title
Posts: 7164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:43 am

Re: I feel like 12 tracks is the optimal number for an album

Post by zeb »

Yeah, six on either side seems best.
Post Reply